Skip to main content

Advertisement

Swedish emergency hospital surgical surge capacity to mass casualty incidents

Abstract

Background

In Sweden the surgical surge capacity for mass casualty incidents (MCI) is managed by county councils within their dedicated budget. It is unclear whether healthcare budget constraints have affected the regional MCI preparedness. This study was designed to investigate the current surgical MCI preparedness at Swedish emergency hospitals.

Methods

Surveys were distributed in 2015 to department heads of intensive care units (ICU) and surgery at 54 Swedish emergency hospitals. The survey contained quantitative measures as the number of (1) surgical trauma teams in hospital and available after activating the disaster plan, (2) surgical theatres suitable for multi-trauma care, and (3) surgical ICU beds. The survey was also distributed to the Armed Forces Centre for Defence Medicine.

Results

53 hospitals responded to the survey (98%). Included were 10 university hospitals (19%), 42 county hospitals (79%), and 1 private hospital (2%). Within 8 h the surgical capacity could be increased from 105 to 399 surgical teams, while 433 surgical theatres and 480 ICU beds were made available. The surgical surge capacity differed between university hospitals and county hospitals, and regional differences were identified regarding the availability of surgical theatres and ICU beds.

Conclusions

The MCI preparedness of Swedish emergency care hospitals needs further attention. To improve Swedish surgical MCI preparedness a national strategy for trauma care in disaster management is necessary.

Introduction

The Swedish total-defence system, the intimate national civil-military collaboration during the cold war era was able to mobilize all available resources to defend the country [1, 2]. Recently, it has been indicated that Swedish surgical mass casualty incident (MCI) preparedness has decreased substantially since the cessation of the cold war [3, 4]. At the same time the Swedish Defence Commission points out that the security of Sweden’s neighbourhood has declined and that the current threat assessment cannot exclude military measures against Sweden [5].

The Swedish defence healthcare system strongly depends on the support of civilian healthcare during increased levels of mobilisation [6]. Swedish legislation requires public healthcare institutions to maintain MCI preparedness including wartime scenarios [7, 8]. Due to chronic budgetary deficits in most emergency hospitals, investments in the maintenance of MCI preparedness may have received low priority. Until now it is unclear how healthcare budget constraints have affected the regional MCI preparedness [9, 10]. The aim of this paper was to study surgical MCI preparedness in Swedish emergency care hospitals.

Methods

Study design

This is a cross-sectional study of Swedish emergency hospital’s surgical capacity related to MCI. It is based on the results of a written questionnaire sent to all hospitals in Sweden with an emergency department. Informed consent was obtained from the respondents in each hospital. No personal data was collected, but hospital resource and infrastructure information, as well as publicly available population data.

Setting

Sweden has a tax-funded public healthcare system, regulated by the Health and Medical Service Act. The role of the central government is to establish principles and guidelines ensuring that everyone has equal access to healthcare services and to set the political agenda for health and medical care [11]. Sweden is divided in 21 county councils, each given the responsibility to organize and deliver medical care within their geographical area. According to legislation they are also responsible to plan for mass casualty incidents (MCI), which should be based on risk and vulnerability analyses. Apart from the usual hazards related to transports, fires, chemical incidents etc., acts of terror as well as consequences of sudden climate changes and breakdown of critical infrastructure have emerged as potential causes of MCIs. Every emergency hospital is required to have a MCI/“disaster” plan, which can be activated to different levels of alert [10].. The level of alert can be one of the following:

  1. 1.

    Green Alert, (“Stand by”), where a hospital command group keeps itself informed about the situation, takes necessary measures and monitor the development

  2. 2.

    Yellow Alert (“Partial mobilization”), where a number of pre-defined clinical key functions of the hospital are activated to receive casualties

  3. 3.

    Red Alert (“Full mobilization”) where all available staff within emergency and supporting disciplines are alerted

Questionnaire

The number of surgical teams, number of ICU beds and surgical theatres are, according to the reference group, well-established numerical key performance indicators for surgical capacity and are commonly used benchmarks in surgical trauma centres. The reference group consisted of disaster preparedness representatives from the National Board of Health and Welfare, the Civil Contingencies Agency, and the Armed Forces Centre for Defence Medicine.

The survey was sent by The National Board of Health and Welfare directly to all Swedish emergency hospitals and the military field hospital as part of a larger survey of Swedish trauma care.

The survey was addressed to the Heads of the Departments of surgery and the Departments of anaesthesiology/ICU. These were contacted by telephone; the purpose of the study was explained, and they were requested to either answer the questionnaire, which was sent by e-mail to the respondents.

The questionnaire form included an introductory text on the background of the trauma investigation and information on how data was going to be presented. A translated version of the questions is presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Translation of the surgical preparedness survey

Population data

Swedish population data was obtained by the open national population registry maintained by Statistics Sweden.

Statistical analysis

Baseline data and distribution are presented in tables. Differences regarding to hospital type and region are presented in tables. Group differences were tested with the Student t-test. As relevant hospital types, university hospitals, county hospitals and private hospitals with emergency departments, were included. Following regions were defined: West (Västra Götalandsregion, Halland), East (Stockholm, Gotland, Uppsala), South (Skåne, Blekinge, Kalmar, Kronoberg), North (Dalarna, Jämtland, Norrbotten, Västerbotten, Västernorrland, Gävleborg), and Central (Östergötland, Sörmland, Västmanland, Örebro, Jönköping).

The data table was processed using Microsoft Excel for Mac (version 16.26).

Results

Study population

In total, 54 hospitals received the questionnaire, of which 53 answered all questions (98%). Included were 10 university hospitals (19%), 42 county hospitals (79%), and 1 private hospital (2%).

Capacity after full mobilization (“red alert”)

Surgical theatres

The number of surgical theatres equipped to deal with major trauma in Sweden was 433. University hospitals contributed 36% of the total number of surgical theatres, county hospitals 63% and private hospitals 2% (Table 2).

Table 2 Surgical surge capacity related to hospital type

Intensive care units

The number of ICU beds in Sweden was 480. University hospitals contributed 36%, county hospitals 63% and private hospitals 2% (Table 2).

Surgical trauma teams

The number of surgical trauma teams in Sweden could be increased from 105 available teams within 30 min to 399 teams 8 h after activation of a Red Alert. County hospitals contributed with 72% of the available teams, while university hospitals contributed 27% and private hospitals 1% (Table 2).

Surgical surge dynamics

The mobilised surgical teams increased from 105 teams after 30 min to 231 teams after 2 h and to 399 teams after 8 h (Fig. 1). The time to mobilize the full capacity of 480 ICU beds in Sweden (mean 2.5 h) was longer in university hospitals (5.4 h) as compared to county hospitals (1.8 h) (p < 0.001) (Table 2).

Fig. 1
figure1

The contribution to the surgical team surge capacity was related to hospital type

Regional differences

There were regional differences in the availability of operation theatres, surgical teams, and ICU-beds. These are presented in Table 3.

Table 3 Regional differences with regards to population density, number of hospitals, and surgical capacity

In the East the number of ICU beds do not match the number of surgical teams and operation theatres, in contrast to the West (Gothenburg area), where the number of ICU beds that can be mobilized are approximately double the number of surgical teams and surgical theatres.

Contribution of military surgical capacity

The military surgical capacity is dimensioned for an armed force with 14,600 soldiers. Thus, the field hospital has 6 surgical teams, 6 operation theatres and 6 ICU beds (Table 3). Compared to civilian care the military field hospital represents 1.5% of the national surgical teams, 1.4% of the national surgical theatres and 2.5% of the national ICU bed capacity.

Discussion

This study presents an assessment of the emergency hospitals’ surgical disaster preparedness from a nationwide Swedish perspective. We found regional differences regarding availability of ICU-beds, surgical theatres, trauma teams, and differences between university hospitals, county hospitals and private hospitals in surgical surge capacity.

Swedish surgical disaster preparedness

The preparedness of Swedish hospitals for disaster, crisis or homeland defence gradually diminished after the cessation of the cold war. The military surgical capacity was dramatically reduced in 2002. Similarly, the civilian homeland defence resources were down prioritized. In 2015 Sweden had a total defence healthcare system with reduced resources for surgical MCI preparedness [4].

In total, the combined surgical capacity was 399 surgical teams, 433 surgical theatres and 480 ICU beds (Table 2). The possible military contribution to these numbers was 6 surgical teams, 6 operation theatres and 12 ICU beds. These figures depend on a fully operational hospital infrastructure, with unaltered availability of hospital staff, pharmaceuticals, medical supplies and blood products. In the situation of a national emergency, these conditions cannot be taken for granted.

With 2.4 beds per 1000 inhabitants, Sweden had one of the lowest numbers of hospital beds per capita in 2015 according to a report from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) [12]. This came at the cost of overutilization of hospital beds. The Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions reported an overutilization with 5.4 per 100 hospital beds [13]. Therefore, the system struggles with the preparedness for a large number of patients in case of an MCI.

The capability to receive, treat and care for patients arriving after a large-scale MCI has not been analysed in depth in this study, but it is likely to be affected negatively by:

  • Insufficient prehospital transport capacity both by ground-based and aeromedical evacuation

  • Technical vulnerability of Swedish hospitals

  • Insufficient pharmaceutical and medical supplies

  • Under-dimensioned number of hospital-beds and ICU-units

  • Insufficient number of trauma-competent staff at Swedish hospitals

Regional differences in disaster preparedness

The population density distribution of Sweden with a very low population density in the northern regions and a relatively high population density in the South reveals the geographical challenges of MCI preparedness. Even though few people live in the North, mining industry, dense railway and air traffic are possible sources for MCI. It is therefore reasonable that the number of hospital surgical theatres and ICU beds per capita are higher in the northern than in the southern regions (Table 3). There is currently no consensus on the minimally necessary number of surgical theatres and ICU beds related to population density which remains as a subject of further research.

Importance of study results for Swedish healthcare policy

Most injured in a mass casualty incident in Sweden will be taken care of by the national civilian healthcare system, regardless of the cause. This is also true for military personnel wounded in an armed conflict. Therefore, the national disaster preparedness is directly associated to armed forces health from a total defence perspective. The national resilience, being one of the critical pillars of total defence is associated to the ability of providing an adequate level of medical care [5]. Of course, Sweden is not the only country struggling with hospital disaster preparedness [14,15,16]. Thus, multinational coordination of disaster preparedness efforts as for instance the European Commission Disaster Risk Management Knowledge Centre will improve interoperability and mitigate the risk of repeating mistakes [17].

Sweden’s defence policy is relying on a strong total defence, and partner nations’ armies joining Swedish forces against foreign hostilities. As a trustworthy host and partner nation, Sweden needs to be prepared to provide host nation medical support to friendly military troops [18].

Strengths and limitations

Survey studies are typically prone to errors related to coverage, sampling, measurement, and nonresponse [19]. This study eliminated coverage errors by including all emergency hospitals in Sweden. The population of interest was clearly identified, and due to the nationwide design sampling was not necessary. All but one emergency hospital responded, thus the nonresponse rate was less than 2%. Possible reasons for the high response-rate were a sense of importance of this survey as well as the involvement of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. The questions in the survey were directly related to the topic of interest - surgical surge capacity. Similar questions have been successfully used in previous studies [4].

The survey has identified the dynamics of mobilizing certain key assets but not the dynamics of patient flow. Instead of focusing on isolated parameters, a more relevant question could have been to ask the hospitals to describe the number of major trauma patients they can manage within certain timeframes. However, as the experience among Swedish hospitals to deal with MCI is limited, the expected accuracy of such data remains questionable. For similar reasons questions regarding hospital endurance, as a key performance indicator for disaster preparedness, was not included in this survey [20].

Most hospitals train their trauma-teams at their emergency department with exercises including a limited number of simulated casualties. Very few hospitals train for MCI, focusing on the hospital’s entire ability to deal with a very large number of trauma casualties. Unfortunately, the disaster preparedness plans of most hospitals are rarely tested in large scale exercises.

Beyond that, the study focuses merely on hospital surgical capacity. It did not include prehospital capacity, nor inter-hospital patient transfer capacity. The ability of the surgical capacity of neighbouring countries to assist has not been subject of this survey.

Future areas of research

While conducting this study the following knowledge gaps have been identified that need to be investigated in order to create a better understanding of the national disaster preparedness in Sweden as well as to identify solutions to increase that readiness:

  • Prehospital capacity and inter hospital transfer capacity.

  • Benchmarking of countries’ disaster preparedness.

  • Swedish hospitals capacity to deal with large number of casualties, identifying the bottle necks of the organization.

  • The effect of disaster exercises on the same hospitals, with figurants, comparing the outcome with simulations including identical parameters

  • Access to critical pharmaceutical products and medical disposables

  • Endurance of Swedish hospitals regarding availability to sustain in disaster-mode.

  • Civilian-military collaboration in crisis management.

Conclusion

This study was an attempt to quantify current Swedish national surgical preparedness in response to MCI. Our results must be followed by recurrent nationwide surveys to identify early trends in hospital preparedness. Sweden is facing the demanding challenge to increase its national surgical surge capacity. Swedish surgical MCI preparedness needs a national long-term strategy for trauma system development in MCI based on reliable key performance indicators is necessary.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ICU:

Intensive Care Unit

MCI:

Mass Casualty Incident

OECD:

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

References

  1. 1.

    Agrell W: The illusions of peace. The rise and fall of the national defence 1988-2009 [Fredens illusioner. Det nationella försvarets nedgång och fall 1988–2009]: Atlantis, Lund; 2010.

  2. 2.

    von Sydow B. Resilience: planning for Sweden’s “Total Defence”. NATO Review magazine, 2018.

  3. 3.

    Silfverskiöld S. A military technical approach to capability development [Ett militärtekniskt perspektiv på förmågeutveckling]. Kungl Krigsvetenskapsakademiens Handlingar och Tidskrift. 2017;221(1):65–85.

  4. 4.

    Blimark M. Decline of Swedish surgical capacity related to higher levels of alert [Reduktionen av svensk kirurgisk operationskapacitet vid höjd beredskap]. Tidskrift i Sjöväsendet. 2016;179(1):25–34.

  5. 5.

    Swedish Defense Commission: White book on Sweden’s security policy and the development of the military Defence 2021–2025. Försvarsdepartementet, 2019.

  6. 6.

    Khorram-Manesh A. Facilitators and constrainers of civilian-military collaboration: the Swedish perspectives. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018. Epub ahead of print.

  7. 7.

    Statens Författningssamling: Law on county councils measures for preparedness for extraordinary events in peace and higher levels of alert [Lag om kommuners och landstings åtgärder inför och vid extraordinära händelser i fredstid och höjd beredskap]. Justitiedepartementet, 2006.

  8. 8.

    Svartz N. The robust hospital [Det robusta sjukhuset]: Krisberedskapsmyndigheten (KBM); 2008.

  9. 9.

    Hallengren L, Lobosco H: Support of county councils in disaster preparedness and planning for civil defence in healthcare [Uppdrag att stödja landstingen i arbetet med katastrofmedicinsk beredskap och planering för civilt försvar inom hälso- och sjukvården]. Socialdepartementet, 2018.

  10. 10.

    Göransson Nyberg A, Stricklin D, Sellström A. Mass casualties and health care following the release of toxic chemicals or radioactive material--contribution of modern biotechnology. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8(12):4521–49.

  11. 11.

    Ånell A, Glenngård AH, Merkur S. Sweden health system review. Health systems in transition. 2012;14(5):1–159.

  12. 12.

    OECD: Hospital beds. In: Health at a Glance 2017: OECD Indicators. Edn. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2017: 172–173.

  13. 13.

    Overutilisation of hospital beds [Överbeläggningar] [https://www.vantetider.se/Kontaktkort/Sveriges/Overbelaggning/] accessed 2019-DEC-23.

  14. 14.

    Kippnich M, Kowalzik B, Cermak R, Kippnich U, Kranke P, Wurmb T. Disaster control and civil protection in Germany. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2017;52(9):606–617.

  15. 15.

    Nekoie-Moghadam M, Kurland L, Moosazadeh M, Ingrassia PL, Della Corte F, Djalali A. Tools and checklists used for the evaluation of hospital disaster preparedness: a systematic review. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016;10(5):781–8.

  16. 16.

    Paganini M, Borrelli F, Cattani J, Ragazzoni L, Djalali A, Carenzo L, Della Corte F, Burkle FM, Ingrassia PL. Assessment of disaster preparedness among emergency departments in Italian hospitals: a cautious warning for disaster risk reduction and management capacity. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;24(1):101.

  17. 17.

    Ríos Díaz F, Ferrer MM, Antofi TE, Luoni S, Faiella A. Update of the disaster risk management knowledge Centre loss database architecture for disaster risk management. In: JRC Technical Reports. Luxemburg; 2018. p. 51.

  18. 18.

    Försvarsdepartementet: Ds 2015:39 Memorandum of Understanding with NATO on Host Nation Support. 2014.

  19. 19.

    Ponto J. Understanding and evaluating survey research. J Adv Pract Oncol. 2015;6(2):168–71.

  20. 20.

    Fredholm L, Göransson A-L. Emergency response Management in Today’s complex society: Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB); 2010.

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare and The Swedish Armed Forces Centre for Defence Medicine.

Author information

MB designed the study, MB and YR analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript, while PÖ, HL, PM and KB interpreted the data and critically revised the manuscript.

Correspondence to Magnus Blimark.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study is based on a survey regarding Swedish trauma care conducted under the auspices of The National Board of Health and Welfare. The heads of Departments of Surgery and Anaesthesia/ICU in all Swedish emergency hospitals were contacted prior to distributing the questionnaires and informed consent was obtained. The purpose of the study was described as well as how data should be used. The security office of the Surgeon General of the Swedish Armed Forces has approved of publication of results of this study. No personal data was collected.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blimark, M., Örtenwall, P., Lönroth, H. et al. Swedish emergency hospital surgical surge capacity to mass casualty incidents. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 28, 12 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-020-0701-8

Download citation