Skip to main content

The MeSH heading “Call Center” is due for an update: why we recommend the more precise heading “Emergency Medical Communication Center”

Abstract

Call centers can be found in various industries. However as a Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) the term “Call centers” does not reflect the critical purpose of handling emergency calls. We recommend “emergency medical communication center(s)”, as this provides clarity and precision regarding the primary function and purpose of the center.

Background

The Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) tree-structure “Emergency Medical Services [N02.421.297]” includes the MeSH Heading “Call Centers” (Tree Number: N02.421.297.036, Unique ID: D000070456). The Scope Note defines it as “A facility set up for the purpose of handling large volumes of telephone calls. Call Centers typically utilize some form of computer automation for receiving, dispatching, screening, logging and forwarding telephone calls”. It has been an established Public MeSH since 2017. However, call centers can be found in various industries such as customer service, telemarketing, technical support, sales, health insurance and more [1]. Hence, the term “Call Center” itself does not specify the nature or purpose of the calls being handled.

Emergency Medical calls

Because of the MeSH headings’ linkage to the tree-structure “Emergency Medical Services” (EMS), we advocate that “Call Center(s)” is vague and due for an update. Worldwide, in cases of medical emergency, Emergency Medical Communication Centers (EMCCs) are the primary contact point between callers and the healthcare system. The EMCCs are manned with personnel responsible for answering emergency calls, assessing and triaging patients over the phone, providing first aid instructions and medical advice, prioritizing necessary resources, dispatching ambulances, and coordinating emergency response services [2]. Consequently, we propose this more specific and descriptive term to replace the previously mentioned “Call Center” term as a MeSH heading.

Preferably, the Scope Note should entail examples of the different emergency medical numbers internationally, such as 9-1-1 in the US, 1-1-2 in most of Europe, as well as other national variations.

Overlapping headings?

One might discuss the overlap and consequential need for the existing MeSH heading “Emergency Medical Dispatch [N02.421.297.043]” (EMD), which is defined as “the mobilization of emergency care to the locations and people that need them”. In our opinion, this as an operator role or function within the EMCC. However, we recognize that EMDs may be structured differently [3], as there is a large diversity in the organisation of EMDs between countries and, in some cases, within countries [4].

Another existing MeSH heading, “Emergency Medical Service Communication Systems [N02.421.297.058]”, concerns the more technical use of communication systems and should not be confused with emergency care information systems named “information systems” in the MeSH tree-structure.

Our suggestion for the updated heading is:

Full MeSH Heading: Emergency Medical Communication Center(s)

Short form: EMCC

Scope Note:

A facility set up for the purpose of handling emergency medical telephone calls to emergency medical numbers, such as 9-1-1 in the US, 1-1-2 in most of Europe, as well as several national variations. Emergency Medical Communication typically utilizes some form of computer automation and/or assistance for receiving, logging, and forwarding large volumes of emergency telephone calls. Operators assess and triage emergency medical calls, prioritize initiatives, provide medical advice over the phone and dispatch and coordinate Emergency Medical Services response.

Summary

Using the term “Emergency Medical Communication Center(s)” provides clarity and precision regarding the primary function and purpose of the center. There is a slight variation in the literature, as both the term “center” and “centre” is used regarding EMCC, depending on whether the author uses US or UK English. As the plural form for both are “centers”, and MeSH is published by the National Library of Medicine, center(s) would be the preferred option. By having an updated and specific MeSH, it becomes easier to distinguish EMCCs from other types of call centers, as it provides coherence for researchers and facilitates the availability of relevant knowledge in literature searches.

Data Availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

EMCC:

Emergency Medical Communication Center

EMD:

Emergency Medical Dispatch

MeSH:

Medical Subject Headings

EMS:

Emergency Medical Services

References

  1. Griffith KN, Li D, Davies ML, Pizer SD, Prentice JC. Call center performance affects patient perceptions of access and satisfaction. Am J Manag Care. 2019;25(9):e282–e7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Leonardsen A-C, Ramsdal H, Olasveengen TM, Steen-Hansen JE, Westmark F, Hansen AE, et al. Exploring individual and work organizational peculiarities of working in emergency medical communication centers in Norway- a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):545.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bohm K, Kurland L. The accuracy of medical dispatch - a systematic review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018;26(1):94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Castrén M, Karlsten R, Lippert F, Christensen EF, Bovim E, Kvam AM, et al. Recommended guidelines for reporting on emergency medical dispatch when conducting research in emergency medicine: the Utstein style. Resuscitation. 2008;79(2):193–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AKVH: conceptualization, writing - original draft, writing - review & editing. JB, GB, MH, SI, EI, A-CLL, EZ, TMJ: writing – editing & critically reviewing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Astrid K. V. Harring.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harring, A.K.V., Blinkenberg, J., Brattebø, G. et al. The MeSH heading “Call Center” is due for an update: why we recommend the more precise heading “Emergency Medical Communication Center”. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 31, 91 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-023-01155-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-023-01155-0

Keywords