Skip to main content

Challenges in the PREHOSPITAL emergency management of geriatric trauma patients – a scoping review

Abstract

Background

Despite a widely acknowledged increase in older people presenting with traumatic injury in western populations there remains a lack of research into the optimal prehospital management of this vulnerable patient group. Research into this cohort faces many uniqu1e challenges, such as inconsistent definitions, variable physiology, non-linear presentation and multi-morbidity. This scoping review sought to summarise the main challenges in providing prehospital care to older trauma patients to improve the care for this vulnerable group.

Methods and findings

A scoping review was performed searching Google Scholar, PubMed and Medline from 2000 until 2020 for literature in English addressing the management of older trauma patients in both the prehospital arena and Emergency Department. A thematic analysis and narrative synthesis was conducted on the included 131 studies. Age-threshold was confirmed by a descriptive analysis from all included studies. The majority of the studies assessed triage and found that recognition and undertriage presented a significant challenge, with adverse effects on mortality. We identified six key challenges in the prehospital field that were summarised in this review.

Conclusions

Trauma in older people is common and challenges prehospital care providers in numerous ways that are difficult to address. Undertriage and the potential for age bias remain prevalent. In this Scoping Review, we identified and discussed six major challenges that are unique to the prehospital environment. More high-quality evidence is needed to investigate this issue further.

Introduction

By 2030 one in four people in the United Kingdom (UK) are expected to be older than 65 with those over 80 being the most rapidly growing demographic in our society [1]. In the last decade, national and international trauma systems have witnessed a shift in the type of trauma mechanism and age of patient admissions. Older people (≥65 years old) falling from a standing height now constitute the largest share of major trauma presentations in the UK [2]. Frailty, multi-morbidity and advanced age are widely accepted as risk factors for adverse outcomes [3]. Anatomic and physiologic changes make assessment more challenging [2, 4]. Adapting care for this vulnerable cohort is recognised as a key goal within the NHS long term plan [5]. This extends to the prehospital emergency setting where care systems differ across Europe, but the challenge of adapting to an older population remains [6]. Research specific to trauma in older people is far outweighed by that in younger cohorts, especially in the prehospital setting. This Scoping review aims to summarise the challenges in providing prehospital care to older trauma patient.

Methods

Search strategy

We performed a scoping literature review according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines [7]. Searches were conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar and Medline from January 2000 until April 2020 for articles written in English. The following search terms were included: prehospital, emergency, management, geriatric trauma. These terms were used rather than specific age cut-offs to ensure that all patients/papers were included, no matter what the individual paper inclusion criteria was. The terms were adjusted for the requirements of the different databases to maximise the search results (Additional File 1). Searching of references of included studies yielded additional material. Studies addressing prehospital and emergency department settings were included, regardless of the Injury Severity Score (ISS). This scoping review did not fulfil the registration criteria of PROSPERO.

Study selection

Two independent authors (ME and HR) repeated the initial literature identification process independently from each other using identical search terms. Title and abstract screening were performed followed by full-text screening. Articles were organized using the online platform©2020 Covidence, and any conflicts were discussed and evaluated according to the inclusion criteria before consensus was reached. A third author (GP) was tasked to resolve any conflicts to limit selection bias. Articles were removed if they were updated within the set time frame, and the most recent version was included.

Data extraction and processing

Two authors (ME and SH) performed data extraction independently. Study characteristics and relevance towards the review were evaluated and extracted. Extraction data included information and origin of the author(s), study type, study aims, age threshold number of participants. A formal quality assessment of included studies is not performed in Scoping Reviews, but the results are presented in tables with a narrative (see Additional File 1).

A narrative synthesis of included studies was performed. Statistical analysis of age cut-offs, and the distribution of included published studies over time was established using IBM® SPSS® Statistics (Version 26).

Results

After 29 duplicates were excluded, 1034 publications were identified (see Fig. 1). Reasons for exclusion can be viewed in supplemental material. Additional File 1 (Table 1) gives an overview of the included studies and the study type. Additional File 1 (Table 2) shows the included studies with their characteristics, including a short narrative of the study. Many of the publications (n = 71/131) used a threshold of more than 65 years to define an older trauma patient, but there was no universal cut-off for older age (see Fig. 2). 93 of the 131 studies were conducted in the United States.

Fig. 1
figure1

PRISMA Flow Diagram

Fig. 2
figure2

Distribution of different definitions for older age from the included studies

Challenge 1: understanding of mechanism of injury (MOI)

Low-energy falls (used synonyms: ground-level falls/low-level falls/same-level falls)

An understanding of high- and low-energy mechanisms of injury and subsequent relative energy transfer is crucial for effective injury detection and trauma triage. In older adults low-energy falls are much more common, with most injuries being caused by blunt force [8]. In the presence of frailty, osteoporosis, sarcopenia and other comorbidities, these perceived low energy mechanisms can result in severe injuries [9, 10]. Falls are the most common reason (~ 60%) for severe traumatic injury and death in older adults [10,11,12,13], with over two-thirds of patients presenting more than once after a fall [14]. These events usually happen indoors [15, 16]. Musculoskeletal weakness, poor balance and slower response times to protect vital areas lead to more direct impacts to the hip or head [11]. Other frequent significant injuries include rib fractures, which are associated with increased mortality in older people [17]. Patients who have already had a fall may fear another, and therefore reduce their activities, leading to a downward spiral of rapid physiological decline [18]. A thorough evaluative falls assessment is crucial to prevent future falls and subsequent injury, especially in patients that are not transported to hospital [19], and an appreciation of the potential harm of relatively low impact falls on an older person with altered physiology and anatomy is crucial when assessing patients.

Road traffic collisions (RTCs)

Older people, and especially females, more commonly suffer from severe thoracic injuries after RTCs, even at low speed [11]. If involved as a pedestrian, older people are overrepresented in fatalities [11, 20, 21], and blunt aortic injuries are three times more common in this group [11]. Compared to younger patients that die on the scene, older patients are more likely to suffer from severe thoracic and pelvic injuries, in addition to traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injuries [20, 22,23,24]. Severe injuries are associated with the mobility status of the occupant after the crash, the angle of impact and the number of injured people [25] and ideally, these variable should be included into triage pathways [26]. Older motorcyclists sustain more injuries, especially fractures, and have more complex acute and chronic complications [27]. Interestingly, hip fractures following these incidents often cause more significant pelvic bleeding compared to younger patients, with higher massive transfusion requirements [28]. The higher prevalence of anticoagulant medications may contribute towards this [29]. An understanding of the different injury patterns in higher energy mechanisms on the older patient is key to assessment.

Abuse

Older people are vulnerable to physical abuse and neglect. The highest risk groups are those with cognitive impairment or communication difficulties. If injuries are inconsistent with the history provided, or other concerns are raised or suspected, then the principles and processes of Adult Safeguarding should be followed [30,31,32]. Patients should be supported through this process, as fear, shame, self-blame or lack of understanding of their rights mean as many as four in five cases of abuse in older people are not reported [33].

Challenge 2: recognition of altered physiology (vital signs and monitoring)

Vital signs are used in trauma triage criteria to activate direct transfer to major trauma centres and in-hospital trauma team activation. If standard vital sign thresholds are used, this has been found to result in under-triage in older patients due to “pseudo stability”, (perceived stability when in fact the observed vital signs are not representative of the physiologic state of the patient) as the threshold for shock is lower than in younger patients [34]. A lack of recognition of haemorrhagic shock is the most frequent cause of preventable deaths in older patients with trauma [35] and so new approaches using combined values of vital signs and age, such as the age-adjusted shock index ([heart rate/systolic blood pressure] x age), have been developed with superior sensitivity and specificity [36,37,38,39]. An age-adjusted shock index of more than 50 is suspicious of occult shock [11].

Heart rate

Tachycardia can be masked in older people with hypovolaemic shock due to altered physiology as part of the natural aging process and the use of medications such as beta-blockers [40, 41]. Patients may be deemed “stable” in the pre-hospital setting if they present with vital signs typical for younger adults, causing under-triage [42]. There should be recognition that older patients with traumatic haemorrhage may not mount the same response as their younger counterparts, and thus suspicion of bleeding may be triggered by different heart rate parameters. Additionally, if tachycardia is present, mortality rises with heart rates greater than 90 beats per minute [43].

Blood pressure

Approximately a third of older trauma patients have been found to have occult hypoperfusion with a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of less than 90 mmHg, measured by lactate and base deficit [44]. Hypertension is common in older people, and thus a seemingly ‘normal’ blood pressure for a younger patient may represent significant hypotension in the older patient. An SBP of 110 mmHg has been demonstrated to be an inflection point for increased mortality in older adults [43]. Therefore, 110 mmHg may be a better threshold for identifying hypotension in trauma in older adults [11]. Using this systolic value increases overtriage only moderately, with a significant reduction in undertriage [44]. Some triage models incorporate different blood pressure parameters for Major Trauma Centre (MTC) triage in older people, but the effects on outcome with this approach are unknown.

Base excess and lactate

Although delays in leaving scene must be minimised, blood gas analysis before hospital arrival may contribute to patient assessment, especially in older trauma patients in whom unrecognised hypoperfusion is a common problem (20%) [44,45,46]. A lactate higher than 4 mmol/L or a base excess of less than − 6 mEq/L has been shown to be associated with a 40% mortality rate [47]. In those with occult or unrecognised haemorrhage, the use of lactate and base deficit in the prehospital setting may prove a useful screening tool in addition to the patient assessment.

Glasgow coma score (GCS) and disability

Assessment of baseline GCS is crucial for management decisions. In case of doubt [48] or if the patient suffers a drop in the GCS ≤14 post-injury, there should be a low threshold for transfer to a major trauma centre (MTC). A drop from GCS 15 to 14 has been associated with increased mortality, a higher risk for traumatic brain injury (TBI) and an increased rate of endotracheal intubation (ETI). This effect is not as significant in younger patients [32, 49, 50]. Wasserman et al. found that none of the standard scales of consciousness are reliable to detect severe TBI in older people in the pre-hospital environment [51]. The disability assessment is complex. Eye surgery or previous strokes, for example, can cause fixed pupils and can mislead pre-hospital teams [30]. Additionally, the presence of underlying cognitive impairment, dementia and delirium makes the assessment of disability particularly challenging in older adults.

Head injury is the most frequently injured body part (more than 70%) [15, 52,53,54] and the most under-triaged injury group in older people [55, 56]. Age-related changes in cerebral vasculature predispose to bleeding and shearing injuries. Due to the presence of cerebral atrophy, older patients with head trauma tend to have a higher initial GCS after injury, but can deteriorate quickly once the additional buffering capacity in the cranium is exceeded by haematoma expansion [13, 57]. This “talk and deteriorate” phenomenon is often seen in older patients and has increased prevalence with anticoagulant use. In addition the intracranial pressure (ICP) is often lower, and cerebral autoregulation does not function as effectively as in younger patients [58]. Older patients may not always receive the same aggressive treatment as their younger counterparts and the associated mortality in traumatic brain injury is higher [59,60,61,62].It is also important to be mindful that there is an increased incidence of chronic subdural haematomas (cSDH) with patients often presenting days after a minor trauma with a reduced GCS or other neurologic symptoms that can mimic stroke or transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) [63].

Challenge 3: additional on-scene confounding factors

Delayed presentation

Older trauma patients present later to hospital. This may be for a variety of reasons. Inhabitants of nursing homes have been found to experience delays before an Emergency Medical Service (EMS) is activated after an injury. There is evidence to suggest carers may not realise or appreciate the severity of injuries prior to alerting EMS. This is also true for relatives who may adopt a ‘wait and see’ strategy to avoid the tribulations of hospitalisation [40]. These non-linear presentations complicate the triage process [64] and may contribute towards delays in accessing early appropriate care.

Patient assessment

Prehospital teams face a series of challenges that have an impact on patient outcomes. A quick but thorough assessment, stabilisation and rapid transport to the appropriate destination are the cornerstones of prehospital care, and may be particularly difficult to achieve in older people [48, 65]. Information from any witnesses at the scene about the mechanism of injury and description of any fall is crucial to unravel any possible medical cause for collapse leading to injury. This can be especially important for patients with a reduced GCS either due to injury or co-morbidities such as delirium or dementia. Once transferred to hospital it can be difficult to establish the physical and cognitive baseline of the patient [66] so information from the scene is critical to support handover to the receiving hospital team [30, 31].

Patient refusal

Older people are transported to hospital 4.5 fold more compared to younger patients with many presenting after low-level falls. However, older trauma patients are more likely to refuse conveyance to hospital after injury and one in every ten older adult does not get transported by an EMS team [67]. Compared to younger patients, there is a 25% increased likelihood of non-conveyance and this may act as a barrier to accessing care [68, 69].

Patients refuse conveyance to hospital for multiple reasons including financial worries, unwillingness to be taken to hospital for what is perceived to be a “minor” injury, or that the trauma unit or MTC is too far from home [68, 70]. The ‘scene time’ in cases of non-conveyance is 30% increased compared to patients that get transported to hospital, largely due to ensuring safety, safeguarding and thorough documentation. Non-conveyance calls are therefore resource-intensive but may not always provide visible benefit for the injured patient [67].

Challenge 4: confounders in assessment

Comorbidities

Psychological factors

Unrecognised or severe depression has been associated with suicide attempts in older people [33]. Self-harm may be the first time older patients are diagnosed with depression. Prehospital teams will respond to these cases and should always consider team safety when hazards are involved. Such desperate situations can evolve irrationally and are an actual threat for approaching teams [71, 72].

Physical factors

A history of congestive heart failure, cerebral vascular accidents, hepatic diseases, renal diseases and cancer have been associated with early mortality in initially stable patients [42, 73]. Pre-existing chronic medical conditions are associated with a negative outcome. Interestingly, some conditions have been found to have a protective effect for specific injuries, for example hypertension may have a protective effect in spinal cord injury [74].

Medications and anticoagulation

As discussed, vital signs are influenced by medications and these play an important role in under-triage [30]. Antihypertensive drugs or psychotropic medications are associated with falls [31]. Due to the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and physiologic alterations and interactions, teams must also consider dose adjustments for treatments such as Prehospital Emergency Anaesthesia [75].

A retrospective analysis showed that beta-blockers were associated with increased mortality in injured older patients without head injury and warfarin is significantly correlated to a higher risk of intracranial haemorrhage (ICH’s) and mortality [76]. In the UK, anticoagulation prescriptions increased by 58% from 2009 to 2015 [77]. Anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications are concerning in blunt TBIs due to their predisposition towards ICH. However, the rate of delayed ICH is low, regardless of the pre-injury medication [78, 79].

In those taking anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications, minor wounds such as skin tears can lead to significant bleeding; and reversal agents are rarely available in prehospital care. Haemorrhage control is crucial as well as informing receiving teams of the agent [30, 72].By including anticoagulation within triage criteria, under-triage has been found to reduce to 2% [80], even in TBI [81]. A history of all medications, and especially anticoagulant use should be sought by all pre-hospital clinicians and, if unable to reverse in the pre-hospital setting, be handed over to the receiving team to prepare reversal agents if needed.

Frailty

Frailty is an independent predictor of mortality in older adults [82]. Pre-hospital frailty assessment and the training of EMS providers in the principals of frailty assessment has potential in improving triage and consequently trauma outcomes [64, 83]. Conversely, there are fears that the inappropriate use of frailty may deny access for the most frail to MTCs and therefore negatively affect outcome.

The opportunity to assess frailty in the home environment is valuable, however it can be challenging to complete extensive questionnaires. Goldstein et al. validated a care partner frailty index comprehensive geriatric assessment (CP-FI-CGA) for EMS providers although the 62 point questionnaire may have limitations in large-scale practice [84]. The trauma-specific frailty index (TSFI) is shorter with only 15 questions [85], and the Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale is increasingly being used internationally in emergency healthcare settings [86]. Incorporating prehospital frailty screening into trauma triage criteria and patient assessment may prove valuable in the future. It is equally important that frailty screening is not used to deny access to MTCs or appropriate trauma care for patients who would otherwise have benefited from it.

Long lies

Worryingly, 88% of the patients are alone when they fall [87] and approximately half of all fallers are unable to get up by themselves leading to a long lie [18]. In approximately 30% of falls, patients are on the floor for over an hour. Although 15% of the fallers have a call alarm system to summon help, they are often unused (97%) [87]. Falls are the most common reason (56.9%) for rhabdomyolysis in older people and the majority of these patients (68.9%) will suffer from an acute kidney injury during their hospitalisation [88]. Pre-hospital teams should consider these potential complications before leaving this patient group at home [31], and signpost the receiving team to the potential for these complications on handover.

Accidental hypothermia

Both long lies and head injury can lead to hypothermia. Older people cannot maintain their temperature as well as younger people due to reduced body fat and a decreased metabolism [31, 48].. The consequences of this are coagulopathy, prolonged metabolism times of drugs and dysrhythmias [32]. Pre-hospital clinicians should attempt to minimise further heat loss where possible and anticipate and actively manage its complications [89].

Delirium

Delirium is associated with higher mortality and is common [33]. One frequent cause of delirium is the undertreatment of pain, explained by the concern for the potential side-effects of opioids. This hesitation may counterintuitively increase the risk of delirium [90]. Benzodiazepines should be avoided where possible in older people [33]. Pre-operative risk factors for delirium are indoor injuries, prior cognitive impairment, fever (> 37.5 °C), and prolonged waiting time to definitive treatment [91]. Many factors of trauma management, such as a stressful environment, immobilisation, or reduced perception, may increase the risk of delirium [11].

Challenge 5: appropriate triage decision and destination

Under-triage remains the most significant challenge in the pre-hospital care of older people with trauma. This begins from the moment of injury [41, 92]. As discussed previously, EMS providers may not always recognise severe injury in older trauma patients. Altered physiology, insensitive trauma triage guidelines and the presence of cognitive impairment or delirium contribute towards this [70, 93,94,95,96]. Under-triage rates vary but may be as high as 50% [70]. Patients older than 75 with an ISS of more than 15 have been found to be 50% less likely to be triaged to a MTC compared to younger patients [97].

Whilst most literature agrees that age should be included in trauma triage criteria, there remains uncertainty on the best age cut-off to use, as evidenced in Fig. 2. Lowering the age threshold too far risks stretching trauma team resource unnecessarily and creating ‘trauma-call fatigue’, whilst raising the age threshold too high risks increasing undertriage and preventing access to appropriate and timely trauma care [55, 83, 98,99,100,101]. Many pre-hospital services do not use age-specific trauma triage criteria, and the standard adult criteria lack sensitivity to identify moderate to severe injuries in older people, principally because they focus on the mechanism of injury rather than the pre-morbid status of the individual [102,103,104]. Arguably, in older individuals, clinicians should focus on potential injuries rather than the solitary mechanism [105].

Triage destination

The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) recommends that trauma patients older than 65 years with pre-existing medical conditions should be transported to a MTC [106]. This is supported by several studies reporting reduced mortality in patients who were transported directly to a MTC [107,108,109,110,111]. However, several studies have shown that older trauma patients are less likely to be transferred directly to a MTC, even if they are recognised to have severe injuries [112,113,114,115,116,117]. This might be caused by an unconscious “age bias”; the discrimination of treatment solely based on age and the fear of futility of care [9, 118,119,120,121]. Some EMS providers answered in a survey that they avoid transport of older trauma patients to MTC’s as they do not want to overload it with a “simple fall” [119]. However, early geriatrician input from the time of admission has been shown to improve outcomes [122] and the length of stay (LOS) in the Emergency Department is also shorter after a trauma team activation at the MTC [123], which mitigates the adverse outcomes associated with longer emergency department length of stays in this patient group. Outcomes are also worse when the trauma team is not activated [124]. In rural areas it is has been proposed to establish trauma pathways to prevent a rise in mortality [125].

Challenge 6: prognostication and outcome

Neither the injury severity score (ISS) nor preinjury comorbidities alone are suitable parameters to assess prognosis in older trauma patients [126]. Multiple studies have examined risk factors for early mortality in trauma patients and found that patients ≥60 years had a 4-fold increased risk of death [42, 127]. Age is associated with more complications, such as more severe organ failure [128]. Although increasing age is associated with increased mortality and morbidity, as is the male gender [129,130,131], management decisions should not be based on it alone. Age is not always synonymous with frailty which has also been found to play a major role in outcomes after trauma [11]. With increasing age, it becomes harder to predict the outcome after traumatic injury accurately [132]. Whilst the fatality rate is falling in younger patients (5.5%), it has not fallen (17.3%) and may even be increasing in older patients [133]. Despite this, a significant proportion of older patients who survive their initial trauma return home (67%) [134], and good long-term outcomes can be achieved, even in the oldest age groups [135]. Although a low GCS is associated with poor outcomes and is an independent risk for increased mortality [130] it is difficult to assess the outcome of TBI accurately in older people, as there are many confounders [136].

Discussion

This scoping review highlights the challenges in the pre-hospital care of injured older adults. Six significant hurdles were identified that seem to be most challenging for prehospital teams (see Fig. 3). The studies included demonstrate that differences between older and younger people affect every phase of prehospital trauma care with undertriage of older adults being a crucial determinant in outcome.

Fig. 3
figure3

Overview of the found challenges in the management of older patients with trauma in the prehospital field

The results imply that greater awareness and education of EMS providers may prove valuable in improving care for older adults. Chang et al. surveyed EMS providers establishing reasons for undertriage and found that the lack of training in the care of older patients with trauma was the most commonly stated reason, alongside unfamiliarity with older patients and age bias [119]. Another survey demonstrated that some EMS providers justified their undertriage of older patients by considering that injuries are “an expected part of the ageing process” [137]. This highlights the need for further training, education, and research in the care of this patient population, particularly in injury recognition and triage. Trauma education for EMS has focused in the past on high energy mechanisms, with low level falls in older people not receiving the same attention [9, 66]. Education of EMS providers about the principals of managing major trauma in frail older adults may need more focus to better serve the ageing population [138, 139] and lead to an increased understanding of the nuances of trauma care in older patients [140].

Support for further education is encouraged by the new geriatric trauma coalition GeriTraC [141] and other research agendas [142, 143]. A recent UK study surveyed different networks and societies to formulate research priorities for trauma of older patients and guide future research [144]. Prehospital clinicians were also involved in this survey and three of the top five research questions include prehospital care and are discussed in this review.

Key research and training questions arising from this review should focus on accurate recognition of the injured older patient, appropriate triage and current barriers to these processes. The development of geriatric standard operating procedures (SOPs), or modifications to existing SOPs based on the challenges highlighted in this review may also contribute to increased recognition, improved triage, and reduced mortality [145].

Limitations

There is a lack of high-quality evidence. To maximise search results slightly different search terms were used according to the database requirements. MeSH terms for example include other synonyms and increase the search results but might be different to other databases.

Furthermore, most of the included studies were conducted in the United States of America. Differences in the EMS system compared to Europe limit the applicability of study findings to European healthcare systems.

Conclusion

As far as we know, this scoping review is the first to describe the literature base and challenges in the prehospital care of older trauma patients. This review highlights six key challenges in the prehospital care of older trauma patients, but many questions remain unanswered.

The conclusions of this review can be condensed into three key aspects: 1) Prehospital management of older adults is distinct to younger patients; Altered physiology, covert mechanisms of injury, non-linear presentations and complex co-morbidities increasingly challenge prehospital teams. 2) There is a lack of high-level research in this field. 3) More education and training are needed to optimise prehospital management and improve care and outcomes.

The information gained from this review matches with the author’s own prehospital experience that managing older patients with trauma becomes increasingly complex with new difficulties that are foreign from younger counterparts.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Abbreviations

DICH:

Delayed intracranial haemorrhage

EAST:

Eastern association for the surgery of trauma

EMS:

Emergency medical service

GCS:

Glasgow coma scale

HR:

Hear rate

ICH:

Intra-cranial haemorrhage

ICP:

Intracranial pressure

ISS:

Injury severity score

LOS:

Length of stay

MOI:

Mechanism of injury

MTC:

Major trauma centre

PRISMA:

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses

RTC:

Road traffic collision

SBP:

Systolic blood pressure

SIA:

Shock index – age

TBI:

Traumatic brain injury

TIA:

Transient ischemic attack

TSFI:

Trauma-specific Frailty Index

References

  1. 1.

    Nash A. National population projections: 2016-based projections. Off Natl Stat. 2017. ISSN 1178-0584.

  2. 2.

    Mancini DJ, Allen S. Geriatric physiology. In: Fractures in the elderly. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013 Mar;381(9868):752–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62167-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Brooks SE, Peetz AB. Evidence-based Care of Geriatric Trauma Patients. Surg Clin North Am. 2017 Oct;97(5):1157–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2017.06.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    NHS. The NHS longterm plan. 2019 [Internet]. p. 16. Available from: https://www.longtermplan.nhs.uk.

  6. 6.

    Seblova J, Cimpoesu D, Khoury A, Revue E, Trenkler S. Prehospital emergency care systems in Europe – EuSEM prehospital section survey 2016. Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;25(6):446–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000553.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Cole E, Lynch A, Bridges J, West A. Older people and major trauma. Rev Clin Gerontol. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959259809990177.

  9. 9.

    Coats TJ, Lecky F. ‘Major trauma’: now two separate diseases? Emerg Med J. 2017;34(8):494. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-206788.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Adams SD, Holcomb JB. Geriatric trauma. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015;21(6):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hruska K, Ruge T. The tragically hip: trauma in elderly patients. Emerg Med Clin. 2018;36(1):219–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emc.2017.08.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Rau C-S, Lin T-S, Wu S-C, Yang JC-S, Hsu S-Y, Cho T-Y, et al. Geriatric hospitalizations in fall-related injuries. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2014;22(1):63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-014-0063-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Wu MY, Chen YL, Yiang GT, Li CJ, Lin ASC. Clinical outcome and management for geriatric traumatic injury: analysis of 2688 cases in the emergency department of a teaching hospital in Taiwan. J Clin Med. 2018;7(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7090255.

  14. 14.

    Allan BJ, Davis JS, Pandya RK, Jouria J, Habib F, Namias N, et al. Exploring trauma recidivism in an elderly cohort. J Surg Res. 2013;184(1):582–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2013.03.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Major Trauma in older people - Report. TARN. England&Wales. 2017. Available at https://www.tarn.ac.uk/Content.aspx?c=3793.

  16. 16.

    Chippendale T, Gentile PA, James MK, Melnic G. Indoor and outdoor falls among older adult trauma patients: a comparison of patient characteristics, associated factors and outcomes. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017;17(6):905–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Nagaraj G, Hullick C, Arendts G, Burkett E, Hill KD, Carpenter CR. Avoiding anchoring bias by moving beyond ‘mechanical falls’ in geriatric emergency medicine. Emerg Med Australas. 2018;30(6):843–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.13129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Tinetti ME, Liu WL, Claus EB. Predictors and prognosis of inability to get up after falls among elderly persons. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 1993;269(1):65–70. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1993.03500010075035.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Carpenter CR, Cameron A, Ganz DA, Liu S. Older adult falls in emergency medicine. Clin Geriatr Med. 2019 May;35(2):205–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2019.01.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Radjou A, Kumar SM. Epidemiological and clinical profile of fatality in vulnerable road users at a high volume trauma center. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2018;11(4):282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ang BH, Chen WS, Lee SWH. Global burden of road traffic accidents in older adults: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2017;72:32–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2017.05.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Yee WY, Cameron PA, Bailey MJ. Road traffic injuries in the elderly. Emerg Med J. 2006;23(1):42–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2005.023754.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Switzer JA, Gammon SR. High-energy skeletal trauma in the elderly. J Bone Jt Surg-Am Vol. 2012;94(23):2195–204. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.01166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Heinrich D, Holzmann C, Wagner A, Fischer A, Pfeifer R, Graw M, et al. What are the differences in injury patterns of young and elderly traffic accident fatalities considering death on scene and death in hospital? Int J Legal Med. 2017 Jul 8;131(4):1023–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1531-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Scheetz LJ. Prehospital factors associated with severe injury in older adults. Injury. 2010;41(9):886–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2010.05.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Scheetz LJ, Zhang J, Kolassa JE. Using crash scene variables to predict the need for trauma center care in older persons. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(4):399–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Muratore S, Hawes L, Farhat J, Reicks P, Gipson J, Beilman G. Riding into the golden years: injury patterns and outcomes of advanced-age motorcycle trauma. Am J Surg. 2016;212(4):670–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.06.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kanezaki S, Miyazaki M, Notani N, Tsumura H. Clinical presentation of geriatric polytrauma patients with severe pelvic fractures: comparison with younger adult patients. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016;26(8):885–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-016-1822-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Fohtung RB, Novak E, Rich MW. Effect of new Oral anticoagulants on prescribing practices for atrial fibrillation in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017;65(11):2405–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15058.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Dalton T, Rushing MR, MEA E, Monroe BJ. Complexities of geriatric trauma patients. JEMS. 2015. Available at https://www.jems.com/2015/11/02/complexities-of-geriatric-trauma-patients/.

  31. 31.

    Aschkenasy MT, Rothenhaus TC. Trauma and falls in the elderly. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2006;24(2):413–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emc.2006.01.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Stevenson J. When the trauma patient is elderly. J PeriAnesthesia Nurs. 2004;19(6):392–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2004.08.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kozar RA, Arbabi S, Stein DM, Shackford SR, Barraco RD, Biffl WL, et al. Injury in the aged. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(6):1197–209. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000656.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Lehmann R, Beekley A, Casey L, Salim A, Martin M. The impact of advanced age on trauma triage decisions and outcomes: a statewide analysis. Am J Surg. 2009;197(5):571–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.12.037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Schoeneberg C, Schilling M, Probst T, Lendemans S. Preventable and potentially preventable deaths in severely injured elderly patients: a single-center retrospective data analysis of a German trauma center. World J Surg. 2014;38(12):3125–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2755-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Bruijns SR, Guly HR, Bouamra O, Lecky F, Lee WA. The value of traditional vital signs, shock index, and age-based markers in predicting trauma mortality. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(6):1432–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31829246c7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kim SY, Hong KJ, Shin SD, Ro YS, Ahn KO, Kim YJ, et al. Validation of the shock index, modified shock index, and age shock index for predicting mortality of geriatric trauma patients in emergency departments. J Korean Med Sci. 2016;31(12):2026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Pandit V, Rhee P, Hashmi A, Kulvatunyou N, Tang A, Khalil M, et al. Shock index predicts mortality in geriatric trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(4):1111–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Zarzaur BL, Croce MA, Magnotti LJ, Fabian TC. Identifying life-threatening shock in the older injured patient: an analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2010;68(5):1134–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181d87488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Bonne S, Schuerer DJ. Trauma in the older adult: epidemiology and evolving geriatric trauma principles. Clin Geriatr Med. 2013;29(1 PG-137–50):137–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Bardes JM, Benjamin E, Schellenberg M, Inaba K, Demetriades D. Old age with a traumatic mechanism of injury should be a trauma team activation criterion. J Emerg Med. 2019;57(2):151–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.04.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Benjamin ER, Khor D, Cho J, Biswas S, Inaba K, Demetriades D. The age of Undertriage: current trauma triage criteria underestimate the role of age and comorbidities in early mortality. J Emerg Med. 2018;55(2):278–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.02.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Heffernan DS, Thakkar RK, Monaghan SF, Ravindran R, Adams CA, Kozloff MS, et al. Normal presenting vital signs are unreliable in geriatric blunt trauma victims. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2010;69(4):813–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181f41af8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Brown JB, Gestring ML, Forsythe RM, Stassen NA, Billiar TR, Peitzman AB, et al. Systolic blood pressure criteria in the National Trauma Triage Protocol for geriatric trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(2):352–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000523.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Newgard CD, Uribe-Leitz T, Haider AH. Undertriage remains a vexing problem for even the Most highly developed trauma systems: the need for innovations in field triage. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(4):328. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.4499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Bar-Or D, Salottolo KM, Orlando A, Mains CW, Bourg P, Offner PJ. Association between a geriatric trauma resuscitation protocol using venous lactate measurements and early trauma surgeon involvement and mortality risk. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61(8):1358–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.12365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Callaway DW, Shapiro NI, Donnino MW, Baker C, Rosen CL. Serum lactate and base deficit as predictors of mortality in normotensive elderly blunt trauma patients. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2009;66(4):1040–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181895e9e.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Pudelek B. Geriatric trauma: special needs for a special population. AACN Clin Iss. 2002;13(1):61-72.

  49. 49.

    Caterino JM, Raubenolt A, Cudnik MT. Modification of Glasgow coma scale criteria for injured elders. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18(10):1014–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01164.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Werman HA, Erskine T, Caterino J, Riebe JF, Valasek T. Development of statewide geriatric patients trauma triage criteria. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2011;26(3):170–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X11006315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Wasserman EB, Shah MN, Jones CMC, Cushman JT, Caterino JM, Bazarian JJ, et al. Identification of a neurologic scale that optimizes EMS detection of older adult traumatic brain injury patients who require transport to a trauma center. Prehospital Emerg Care. 2015;19(2):202–12. https://doi.org/10.3109/10903127.2014.959225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kocuvan S, Brilej D, Stropnik D, Lefering R, Komadina R. Evaluation of major trauma in elderly patients – a single trauma center analysis. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2016;128(S7):535–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-016-1140-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Parreira JG, Solda SC, Perlingeiro JA. Comparative analysis of the characteristics of traumas suffered by elderly and younger patients. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2010;56(5):541-6.

  54. 54.

    Scheetz LJ. Injury patterns, severity and outcomes among older adults who sustained brain injury following a same level fall: a retrospective analysis. Int Emerg Nurs. 2015;23(2):162–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2014.09.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Buchanan GS, Kahn DS, Burke H, Czarkowski B, Boe R, Modarresi M, et al. Trauma team activation for geriatric trauma at a level II trauma center: are the elderly under-triaged? Marshall J Med. 2017;3(3). https://doi.org/10.18590/mjm.2017.vol3.iss3.7.

  56. 56.

    Scheetz LJ. Comparison of type and severity of major injuries among Undertriaged and correctly triaged older patients. J Emerg Med. 2012;43(6):1020–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.09.036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Salottolo K, Levy AS, Slone DS, Mains CW, Bar-Or D. The effect of age on Glasgow coma scale score in patients with traumatic brain injury. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(7):727–34. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2014.13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Thompson HJ, WC MC. Traumatic brain injury in older adults: epidemiology, outcomes, and future implications. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(10):1590–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00894.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    KARIBE H, HAYASHI T, NARISAWA A, KAMEYAMA M, NAKAGAWA A, TOMINAGA T. Clinical characteristics and outcome in elderly patients with traumatic brain injury: for establishment of management strategy. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2017;57(8):418–25. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.st.2017-0058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Scheetz LJ, Horst MA, Arbour RB. Early neurological deterioration in older adults with traumatic brain injury. Int Emerg Nurs. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2016.11.003.

  61. 61.

    Schönenberger A, Billeter AT, Seifert B, Neuhaus V, Trentz O, Turina M. Opportunities for improved trauma care of the elderly – a single center analysis of 2090 severely injured patients. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012;55(3):660–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2012.02.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Schumacher R, Müri RM, Walder B. Integrated health Care Management of Moderate to severe TBI in older patients—a narrative review. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2017;17(12):92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-017-0801-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Kulchycki LK, Edlow JA. Geriatric Neurologic Emergencies. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2006;24(2):273–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emc.2006.01.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Fisher JM, Bates C, Banerjee J. The growing challenge of major trauma in older people: a role for comprehensive geriatric assessment? Age Ageing. 2017;46(5):709–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afx035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Scheetz LJ. Life-threatening injuries in older adults. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2011;22(2):128–39. https://doi.org/10.4037/NCI.0b013e3182122c93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Platts-Mills TF, Evans CS, Brice JH. Prehospital triage of injured older adults: thinking slow inside the Golden hour. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(10):1941–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.14405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Goldstein J, Jensen JL, Carter AJE, Travers AH, Rockwood K. The epidemiology of Prehospital emergency responses for older adults in a provincial EMS system. CJEM. 2015;17(5):491–6. https://doi.org/10.1017/cem.2015.20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Holder P, Arthur AO, Thiems G, Redmon T, Thomas M, Goodloe JM, et al. Patients refusing Prehospital transport are increasingly likely to be geriatric. Emerg Med Int. 2012;2012:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/905976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    da Silva HC, de Pessoa R. L, Menezes RMP de. Trauma in elderly people: access to the health system through pre-hospital care. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2016;24. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.0959.2690.

  70. 70.

    Horst MA, Morgan ME, Vernon TM, Bradburn EH, Cook AD, Shtayyeh T, et al. The geriatric trauma patient. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020;89(1):192–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000002646.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Crandall M, Luchette F, Esposito TJ, West M, Shapiro M, Bulger E. Attempted suicide and the elderly trauma patient: risk factors and outcomes. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2007;62(4):1021–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000229784.88927.6e.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Menne A, Haase D, Menaker J, Scalea T. The changing landscape of trauma care, part 1. Emerg Med. 2017;49(7):296–305. https://doi.org/10.12788/emed.2017.0041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Scheetz LJ. Relationship of age, injury severity, injury type, comorbid conditions, level of care, and survival among older motor vehicle trauma patients. Res Nurs Health. 2005;28(3):198–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20075.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    McGwin G, MacLennan PA, Fife JB, Davis GG, Rue LW. Preexisting conditions and mortality in older trauma patients. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2004;56(6):1291–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TA.0000089354.02065.D0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Mitra A, Das T, Rudra A. Geriatric Trauma. J Indian Acad Geriatr. 2017;13:32–40.

  76. 76.

    Neideen T, Lam M, Brasel KJ. Preinjury Beta blockers are associated with increased mortality in geriatric trauma patients. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2008;65(5):1016–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181897eac.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Loo SY, Dell’Aniello S, Huiart L, Renoux C. Trends in the prescription of novel oral anticoagulants in UK primary care. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;83(9):2096–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13299.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Chenoweth JA, Gaona SD, Faul M, Holmes JF, Nishijima DK. Incidence of delayed intracranial hemorrhage in older patients after blunt head trauma. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(6):570–5. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.6159.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Mann N, Welch K, Martin A, Subichin M, Wietecha K, Birmingham LE, et al. Delayed intracranial hemorrhage in elderly anticoagulated patients sustaining a minor fall. BMC Emerg Med. 2018;18(1):27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-018-0179-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Mason MD, Spilman SK, Fuchsen EA, Olson SD, Sidwell RA, Swegle JR, et al. Anticoagulated trauma patients: a level I trauma Center’s response to a growing geriatric population. J Emerg Med. 2017;53(4):458–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.05.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Nishijima DK, Gaona SD, Waechter T, Maloney R, Bair T, Blitz A, et al. Out-of-hospital triage of older adults with head injury: a retrospective study of the effect of adding “anticoagulation or antiplatelet medication use” as a criterion. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;70(2):127–138.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.12.018.

  82. 82.

    Joosten E, Demuynck M, Detroyer E, Milisen K. Prevalence of frailty and its ability to predict in hospital delirium, falls, and 6-month mortality in hospitalized older patients. BMC Geriatr. 2014;14(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Carpenter CR, Platts-Mills TF. Evolving Prehospital, emergency department, and “inpatient” management models for geriatric emergencies. Clin Geriatr Med. 2013;29(1):31–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2012.09.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Goldstein J, Hubbard RE, Moorhouse P, Andrew MK, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K. The validation of a care partner-derived frailty index based upon comprehensive geriatric assessment (CP-FI-CGA) in emergency medical services and geriatric ambulatory care. Age Ageing. 2015;44(2):327–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afu161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Joseph B, Pandit V, Zangbar B, Kulvatunyou N, Tang A, O’Keeffe T, et al. Validating trauma-specific frailty index for geriatric trauma patients: A prospective analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219(1):10–17.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Jarman H, Crouch R, Baxter M, Cole E, Dillane B, Wang C. Frailty in major trauma study (FRAIL-T): a study protocol to determine the feasibility of nurse-led frailty assessment in elderly trauma and the impact on outcome in patients with major trauma. BMJ Open. 2020;10(8):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Fleming J, Brayne C. Inability to get up after falling, subsequent time on floor, and summoning help: prospective cohort study in people over 90. Bmj. 2008;337(7681):1279–82.

    Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Wongrakpanich S, Kallis C, Prasad P, Rangaswami J, Rosenzweig A. The study of rhabdomyolysis in the elderly: an epidemiological study and single center experience. Aging Dis. 2018;9(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.14336/AD.2017.0304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Haverkamp FJC, Giesbrecht GG, Tan ECTH. The prehospital management of hypothermia — an up-to-date overview. Injury. 2018;49(2):149–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.11.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Carpenter C, Stern ME. Emergency orthogeriatrics: concepts and therapeutic alternatives. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2010;28(4 PG-927–49):927–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Juliebø V, Bjøro K, Krogseth M, Skovlund E, Ranhoff AH, Wyller TB. Risk factors for preoperative and postoperative delirium in elderly patients with hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(8):1354–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02377.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Scheetz LJ. Trends in the accuracy of older person trauma triage from 2004 to 2008. Prehospital Emerg Care. 2011;15(1):83–7. https://doi.org/10.3109/10903127.2010.514088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    King ML. Trauma and the elderly: the real picture of their health may be blurred. AJON. 2014;24(2):7-11.

  94. 94.

    Newgard CD, Holmes JF, Haukoos JS, Bulger EM. Improving early identification of the high-risk elderly trauma patient by emergency medical services. Injury. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.09.010.

  95. 95.

    Weber J, Jablonski RA, Penrod J. Missed opportunities: under-detection of trauma in elderly adults involved in motor vehicle crashes. J Emerg Nurs. 2010;36(1 PG-6–9):6–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Smith SG, et al. "Efficacy of Prehospital Criteria in Identifying Trauma Patients Susceptible to Undertriage." JAMA Surg. 2019;154(10):973-4.

  97. 97.

    Lukin W, Greenslade JH, Chu K, Lang J, Brown AFT. Triaging older major trauma patients in the emergency department: an observational study. Emerg Med J. 2015;32(4):281–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2013-203191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Demetriades D, Sava J, Alo K, Newton E, Velmahos GC, Murray JA, et al. Old age as a criterion for trauma team activation. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2001;51(4):754–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-200110000-00022.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Nakamura Y, Daya M, Bulger EM, Schreiber M, Mackersie R, Hsia RY, et al. Evaluating age in the field triage of injured persons. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60(3):335–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.04.006.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Goodmanson NW, Rosengart MR, Barnato AE, Sperry JL, Peitzman AB, Marshall GT. Defining geriatric trauma: when does age make a difference? Surgery. 2012;152(4):668–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2012.08.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Scheetz LJ. Effectiveness of prehospital trauma triage guidelines for the identification of major trauma in elderly motor vehicle crash victims. J Emerg Nurs. 2003;29(2):109–15. https://doi.org/10.1067/men.2003.59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Ichwan B, Darbha S, Shah MN, Thompson L, Evans DC, Boulger CT, et al. Geriatric-specific triage criteria are more sensitive than standard adult criteria in identifying need for trauma center care in injured older adults. Ann Emerg Med. 2015;65(1):92–100.e3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Wiles LL, Day MD, Harris LA. Delta alerts: changing outcomes in geriatric trauma. J trauma Nurs. 2016;23(4):189–93. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTN.0000000000000215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    van Rein EAJ, Houwert RM, Gunning AC, Lichtveld RA, Leenen LPH, van Heijl M. Accuracy of prehospital triage protocols in selecting severely injured patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83(2):328–39. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001516.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Nijboer JMM, van der Sluis CK, Dijkstra PU, ten Duis H-J. The value of the trauma mechanism in the triage of severely injured elderly. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2009;35(1):49–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-008-7069-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Calland JF, Ingraham AM, Martin ND, Marshall GT. Geriatric trauma practice management guideline (Update) Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. 2017. Available at http://tetaf.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Geriatric-Trauma-Practice-Guidelines-east.pdf.

  107. 107.

    Garwe T, Roberts ZV, Albrecht RM, Morgan AE, Johnson JJ, Neas BR. Direct transport of geriatric trauma patients with pelvic fractures to a level I trauma center within an organized trauma system: impact on two-week incidence of in-hospital complications. Am J Surg. 2012;204(6):921–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.05.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Garwe T, Stewart KE, Newgard CD, Stoner JA, Sacra JC, Cody P, et al. Survival benefit of treatment at or transfer to a tertiary trauma center among injured older adults. Prehospital Emerg Care. 2020;24(2):245–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2019.1632997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Garwe T, Stewart K, Stoner J, Newgard CD, Scott M, Zhang Y, et al. Out-of-hospital and inter-hospital under-triage to designated tertiary trauma centers among injured older adults: a 10-year statewide geospatial-adjusted analysis. Prehospital Emerg Care. 2017;21(6):734–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2017.1332123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Pracht EE, Langland-Orban B, Flint L. Survival advantage for elderly trauma patients treated in a designated trauma center. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2011;71(1):69–77. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31820e82b7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Tourtier J-P, Pierret C, Vico S, Jost D, Domanski L. Field triage protocol in elderly trauma patients: what level of care? J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(5):740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.08.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Brown E, Tohira H, Bailey P, Finn J. Is age associated with emergency medical service transport to a trauma Centre in patients with major trauma? A systematic review Australas J Paramed. 2020;23:17(1).

    Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Chu I, Vaca F, Stratton S, Chakravarthy B, Hoonpongsimanont W, Lotfipour S. Special Topic: Injury Prevention. 2007;(May):51–5.

  114. 114.

    Ryb GE, Dischinger PC. Disparities in trauma center access of older injured motor vehicular crash occupants. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2011;71(3):742–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31822ba010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Scheetz L. Trauma center versus non-trauma center admissions in adult trauma victims by age and gender. Prehospital Emerg Care. 2004;8(3):268–72.

    Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Spering C, Lefering R, Bouillon B, Lehmann W, von Eckardstein K, Dresing K, et al. It is time for a change in the management of elderly severely injured patients! An analysis of 126,015 patients from the TraumaRegister DGU®. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020;46(3):487–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-019-01229-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Staudenmayer KL, Hsia RY, Mann NC, Spain DA, Newgard CD. Triage of elderly trauma patients: a population-based perspective. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(4):569–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.06.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Llompart-Pou JA, Pérez-Bárcena J, Chico-Fernández M, Sánchez-Casado M, Raurich JM. Severe trauma in the geriatric population. World J Crit Care Med. 2017;6(2):99–106. https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v6.i2.99.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Chang DC. Undertriage of elderly trauma patients to state-designated trauma centers. Arch Surg. 2008;143(8):776–81; discussion 782. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.143.8.776.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Chang H-Y, Sung Y-H, Wang S-M, Lung H-L, Chang J-H, Hsu C-H, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes in very low birth weight infants with admission hypothermia. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0131976. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131976.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Hsia RY. Factors associated with trauma center use for elderly patients with trauma. Arch Surg. 2011;146(5):585–92. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2010.311.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Fallon WF, Rader E, Zyzanski S, Mancuso C, Martin B, Breedlove L, et al. Geriatric outcomes are improved by a geriatric trauma consultation service. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2006;61(5):1040–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000238652.48008.59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Hammer PM, Storey AC, Bell T, Bayt D, Hockaday MS, Zarzaur BL, et al. Improving geriatric trauma outcomes. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;81(1):162–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001063.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    St. John AE, Rowhani-Rahbar A, Arbabi S, Bulger EM. Role of trauma team activation in poor outcomes of elderly patients. J Surg Res. 2016;203(1):95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.01.036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Rogers FB, Osler TM, Shackford SR, Morrow PL, Sartorelli KH, Camp L, et al. A population-based study of geriatric trauma in a rural state. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2001;50(4):604-11. Available at https://journals.lww.com/jtrauma/Abstract/2001/04000/A_Population_Based_Study_of_Geriatric_Trauma_in_a.3.aspx.

  126. 126.

    Duvall DB, Zhu X, Elliott AC, Wolf SE, Rhodes RL, Paulk ME, et al. Injury severity and comorbidities alone do not predict futility of care after geriatric trauma. J Palliat Med. 2015;18(3):246–50. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2014.0336.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Campbell-Furtick M, Moore BJ, Overton TL, Laureano Phillips J, Simon KJ, Gandhi RR, et al. Post-trauma mortality increase at age 60: a cutoff for defining elderly? Am J Surg. 2016 Oct;212(4):781–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.12.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Vanzant EL, Hilton RE, Lopez CM, Zhang J, Ungaro RF, Gentile LF, et al. Advanced age is associated with worsened outcomes and a unique genomic response in severely injured patients with hemorrhagic shock. Crit Care. 2015;19(1):77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-0788-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Fatovich DM, Jacobs IG, Langford SA, Phillips M. The effect of age, severity, and mechanism of injury on risk of death from major trauma in Western Australia. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Feb;74(2):647–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3182788065.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Labib N, Nouh T, Winocour S, Deckelbaum D, Banici L, Fata P, et al. Severely injured geriatric population: morbidity, mortality, and risk factors. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2011;71(6):1908–14. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31820989ed.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Scheetz LJ. Differences in survival, length of stay, and discharge disposition of older trauma patients admitted to trauma centers and nontrauma center hospitals. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2005;37(4):361–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2005.00062.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Hartka T, Gancayco C, McMurry T, Robson M, Weaver A. Accuracy of algorithms to predict injury severity in older adults for trauma triage. Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup2):S81–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Hill AD, Pinto R, Nathens AB, Fowler RA. Age-related trends in severe injury hospitalization in Canada. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Oct;77(4):608–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Grossman MD, Ofurum U, Stehly CD, Stoltzfus J. Long-term survival after major trauma in geriatric trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 May;72(5):1181–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31824d0e6d.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    S. Soba K, Dong F, Ward JG, Crawford G, Helmer SD, Lemon ML, et al. Octogenarians and motor vehicle collisions. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75(6):1076–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Peters ME, Gardner RC. Traumatic brain injury in older adults: do we need a different approach? Concussion. 2018;3(3):CNC56. https://doi.org/10.2217/cnc-2018-0001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Jones C. Trauma triage: the effect of age on EMS provider clinical judgment and prehospital guidelines for transportation of injured patients. Univ Rochester. 2013.

  138. 138.

    Goldstein J, McVey J, Ackroyd-Stolarz S. The role of emergency medical Services in Geriatrics: bridging the gap between primary and acute care. CJEM. 2016 Jan 18;18(1):54–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/cem.2015.73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Rehn M. Improving adjustments for older age in pre-hospital assessment and care. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013;21(1):2–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Bortz K. Creating a geriatric-focused model of care in trauma with geriatric education. J Trauma Nurs. 2015;22(6):301-5; quiz E1-2. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTN.0000000000000162.

  141. 141.

    Cooper Z, Maxwell CA, Fakhry SM, Joseph B, Lundebjberg N, Burke P, et al. A position paper. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Feb;82(2):419–22. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Melady D. Geriatric emergency medicine: Research priorities to respond to “The Silver Boom.”. CJEM. 2018 May 16;20(3):327–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/cem.2018.397.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Meyers MH, Wei TL, Cyr JM, Hunold TM, Shofer FS, Cowden CS, et al. The triage of older adults with physiologic markers of serious injury using a state-wide Prehospital plan. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019;34(05):497–505. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X19004825.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Alshibani A, Banerjee J, Lecky F, Coats TJ, Prest R, Mitchell Á, et al. A consensus building exercise to determine research priorities for silver trauma. BMC Emerg Med. 2020;20(1):63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-020-00357-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Peterer L, Ossendorf C, Jensen KO, Osterhoff G, Mica L, Seifert B, et al. Implementation of new standard operating procedures for geriatric trauma patients with multiple injuries: a single level I trauma Centre study. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):359. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1380-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Funding

Open access fee courtesy of Cutrale Peri-operative and Ageing Group, Imperial College London.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dr. Eichinger was responsible for the literature search, the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation and writing. Dr. Robb and Dr. Peck were both involved in the literature search, data collection, data analysis and the critical revision. Dr. Tucker, Dr. Scurr and Dr. Heschl contributed to the critical revision of the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Author’s information

It is noteworthy that four of the authors also work in the prehospital environment and are familiar with the challenges teams are facing. Dr. Eichinger works with the ‘Medizinercorps Graz’, which is a special emergency response unit in Graz, Austria, and he is also a member of the Faculty of Pre-hospital Care at the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh. Dr. Scurr works with London’s Air Ambulance, and Dr. Tucker is a HEMS Consultant at Air Ambulance Kent Surrey and Sussex. Finally, Dr. Heschl is a prehospital doctor at the Physician Response Unit in Graz, Austria.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Eichinger.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eichinger, M., Robb, H.D.P., Scurr, C. et al. Challenges in the PREHOSPITAL emergency management of geriatric trauma patients – a scoping review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 29, 100 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00922-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Prehospital care
  • Triage
  • Geriatric trauma
  • Traumatic injuries
  • Trauma