Skip to main content

Advertisement

Comment on epinephrine during resuscitation of traumatic cardiac arrest and increased mortality: a post hoc analysis of prospective observational study

Article metrics

Abstract

The aim of this Letter to the Editor was to report some important biases in a recently published Article. We agreed with the notion by Yamamoto et al. that the effects of epinephrine regarding was limited without hemostasis, however, this study had major limitations such as no information on etiology of traumatic cardiac arrest (hemorrhagic or on non-hemorrhagic) and on hemostatic treatment. The results of this study should be interpreted with caution and further analysis is necessary. Finally, we commented on the necessity of future study regarding another vasopressor (ie; vasopressin) on traumatic cardiac arrest based on current evidence.

Dear Editor.

We read with interest the article of Yamamoto, et al., who reported that epinephrine administration during in-hospital resuscitation of traumatic cardiac arrest was associated with increased mortality [1]. Yamamoto et al. [1] performed post-hoc data analysis on a prospective, multicentre, observational study (SOS-KANTO 2012) consisting of patients who suffered out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and were transported to 67 emergency hospitals by emergency medical services personnel. We agree with the notion by Yamamoto et al. that the effects of epinephrine regarding spontaneous circulation would not persist without hemostasis, and our previous investigation demonstrated that prehospital epinephrine administration was associated with increased temporal return of spontaneous circulation but was not associated with survival [2]. The study of Yamamoto et al. [1] demonstrated that administration of epinephrine was associated with increased mortality even in in-hospital situations where prompt hemostatic treatment could be deployed.

However, we have to interpret the findings of the study of Yamamoto et al. [1] while considering some major limitations. The most important limitation is that the main etiology of traumatic cardiac arrest in the subjects was not known in this study, that is, whether the etiology was hemorrhagic or non-hemorrhagic. Lin, et al. [3] showed that the effect of epinephrine on traumatic cardiac arrest in children differed depending on whether the etiology was hemorrhagic or non-hemorrhagic. Additionally, the details of hemostatic treatment such as emergency thoracotomy, resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta and time to treatment were not entered in the SOS-KANTO 2012 database. In-hospital procedures vary among hospitals and this bias could have affected the results.

Currently, vasopressin is the only vasopressor that has the possibility of improving the outcome of trauma patients [4]. A recent randomized controlled trial showed that administration of low-dose arginine vasopressin to hemorrhagic shock patients decreased blood product requirements [4]. No study has investigated the effect of administration of vasopressin on traumatic cardiac arrest; therefore, further trials are needed.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current work.

References

  1. 1.

    Yamamoto R, Suzuki M, Hayashida K, Yoshizawa J, Sakurai A, Kitamura N, et al. Epinephrine during resuscitation of traumatic cardiac arrest and increased mortality: a post hoc analysis of prospective observational study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019;27(1):74.

  2. 2.

    Aoki M, Abe T, Oshima K. Association of prehospital epinephrine administration with survival among patients with traumatic cardiac arrest caused by traffic collisions. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):9922.

  3. 3.

    Lin YR, Wu MH, Chen TY, Syue YJ, Yang MC, Lee TH, et al. Time to epinephrine treatment is associated with the risk of mortality in children who achieve sustained ROSC after traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):101.

  4. 4.

    Sims CA, Holena D, Kim P, Pascual J, Smith B, Martin N, et al. Effect of low-dose supplementation of arginine vasopressin on need for blood product transfusions in patients with trauma and hemorrhagic shock: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.2884.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding.

Author information

MA wrote the manuscript. TA revised the manuscript. Both authors had read and approved the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Makoto Aoki.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aoki, M., Abe, T. Comment on epinephrine during resuscitation of traumatic cardiac arrest and increased mortality: a post hoc analysis of prospective observational study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 27, 107 (2019) doi:10.1186/s13049-019-0686-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Epinephrine
  • Traumatic cardiac arrest
  • Biases
  • Vasopressin