- Letter to the Editor
- Open Access
Letter to the editor: in response to Alstrup et. al.
© The Author(s). 2019
- Received: 21 May 2019
- Accepted: 5 June 2019
- Published: 17 June 2019
With great interest we have read the article written by Alstrup et al.  recently published in the Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency medicine. They present the quality and potentials of their helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) database. In the Netherlands the prehospital HEMS care is similarly organized as in Denmark. The country is divided in four HEMS regions of similar size, each operating its own digital registration.
As our operation has evolved into a 24/7 coverage in the last decade our database also had to develop and expand. Our most recent evolvement was extensive, such as documentation of prehospital ultrasound. To ensure each dispatch is documented properly, each record is reviewed by the other HEMS team member after completion and each week all records are reviewed by one of three chief physicians.
To optimize database data Arts and colleagues have identified causes with can lead to insufficient data registration at different stages of data collection and registration . They also propose a framework of procedures to assure data quality with respect to prevention, detection and actions for quality control .
When the patient is delivered to the hospital and upon completing the database record, a concise handover is compiled from the database and digitally sent to the receiving hospital. Our database includes 23,616 dispatch calls and 11,784 patient records. For follow-up, we are dependent on the receiving hospitals. We were able to acquire outcome data on 25% of our patients. Apart from the legal obligation to keep a medical record for each patient treated, our database is available for medical research. The large numbers of dispatches and patient contacts, the scarcity of missing information and the extensive quality control of the prospective data resulted in numerous publications and a number of PhD-theses [3, 4].
We suggest that for maximal efficiency of these databases, outcome data should be included. These clinical databases are essential to medical care and offer an excellent way to improve the care we provide .
AH and CS wrote the manuscript. GJvG reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Alstrup K, Petersen JAK, Barfod C, Knudsen L, Rognas L, Moller TP. The Danish helicopter emergency medical service database: high quality data with great potential. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019;27(1):38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-019-0615-5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Arts DG, De Keizer NF, Scheffer GJ. Defining and improving data quality in medical registries: a literature review, case study, and generic framework. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9(6):600–11. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M1087.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Peters JH. ABC in Dutch Helicopter Emergency Medical Services. Nijmegen: Radboud University; 2017.Google Scholar
- Ketelaars R. Applications of ultrasound by the helicopter emergency medical service and the emergency department. Nijmegen: Radboud University; 2019.Google Scholar
- Black N, Payne M. Directory of clinical databases: improving and promoting their use. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(5):348–52. https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.12.5.348.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar