Are ethical norms and current policies still relevant in face of the recent mass terror events?
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 10 August 2016
Accepted: 8 September 2016
Published: 4 October 2016
The widespread utilization of social media in recent terror attacks in major European cities should raise a “red flag” for the emergency medical response teams. The question arises as to the impact of social media during terror events on the healthcare system. Information was published well before any emergency authority received a distress call or was requested to respond. Photos published at early stages of the attacks, through social media were uncensored, presenting identifiable pictures of victims. Technological advancements of recent years decrease and remove barriers that enable the public to use them as they see fit. These attacks raise ethical considerations for the patients and their rights as they were outsourced from the medical community, into the hands of the public. The healthcare system should leverage social media and its advantages in designing response to terror, but this requires a re-evaluation and introspection into the current emergency response models.
The widespread utilization of social media in recent terror attacks of major European cities, including Brussels (March 2016), Paris (November 2015 & June 2016), and Istanbul (June 2016) should raise a “red flag” for the emergency response community, most specifically for medical response teams.
Social media has been researched extensively in regards to emergency management for both natural and manmade emergencies [1, 2]. Major recent disasters, such as the 2010 Haiti earthquake, the 2012 “Super-storm Sandy” or the 2015 Nepal earthquake have all presented social media as the major communication channel between first responders and the public. The question arises as to the impact of social media during terror events, and whether the bi-directional and extremely rapid communication should serve as a wake-up call for the healthcare system concerning ethical norms that up to now have been accepted as important.
During the hours immediately following the Paris and Brussels’ attacks we collected, using TwitterMate (a self-developed system designated to collect tweets from Twitter), the tweets of the public and the emergency responders. During and immediately following the Brussels’ attack, over 400,000 tweets of the public were collected, representing the vast majority of tweets published using the hashtag #Brussels, as well as all tweets (~100,000) posted by Belgium’s emergency and security agencies and the public’s response to them. The analysis of the textual and visual tweets revealed lessons learnt that raise the need to re-formulate some basic beliefs, which are as yet widely accepted principles, and even “sacred” norms, such as patient rights and medical privilege. They also exposed untapped and realizable opportunities to leverage social media, which can improve the ability to respond and manage terror attacks in densely populated areas.
Within a few minutes from the explosions in the Brussels and Istanbul airports, photos from the scene were uploaded to Twitter. These photos were taken on-site, mostly by survivors or bystanders, which provided highly graphic depictions of the injuries, and the overall medical status of the casualties. This information was published well before any emergency authority, outside the airport, received a distress call or was requested to respond.
The photos published at early stages of these terror attacks, through Twitter and other social media were uncensored, presenting identifiable pictures of victims. The privacy of the victims and the dead was grossly invaded without their consent [3, 4]. The general public is unfamiliar with, nor adheres to any ethical guidelines that apply to medical professionals. These photos may reach families and friends prior to receiving any notification and cause unwarranted distress. The technological advancements of recent years decrease and remove barriers that enable the general public to use them as they see fit. The Brussels and Istanbul terror attacks should be a cautionary call for all medical and health institutions as it brings to our attention essential ethical and medical privacy issues that were violated; considerations of the patients and their rights is outsourced from the medical community, into the hands of the general public.
In addition to the need to modify the policy concerning ethics in terror events, social media presents an opportunity to improve the response of medical services by considering the implementation of the following actions.
Hospital personnel can also benefit from the rapid exposure to the casualties’ photos displaying specific injuries, which may facilitate preparedness to admit and treat the casualties in the medical facility. Implementing social media monitoring enable hospitals to actively collect information in order to be better informed compared to current reporting relayed by ambulance teams through conventional channels. Visual and textual updates display more actionable information that may impact on the hospital’s emergency preparations.
Considering the immediacy of information relay, it might be beneficial in unique and exceptional situations, to dispatch hospital’s medical teams to the scene. Deploying hospital staff outside their facility is generally not recommended , but as updated information concerning casualties can now be accessible very early, while the center of gravity is still on-site, such personnel may prove to be crucial in providing advanced life-saving medical treatments to the casualties, before and during the evacuation process. This renewed utilization of medical personnel may be especially vital in terror attacks that occur in major metropolitans, creating chaos, road blocks and a general lock-down that may result in significant traffic constraints that delay the evacuation to the hospitals.
Through bi-directional communication, EMS and hospital teams can provide real-time, crucial guidance to on-site casualties, survivors and bystanders, directing them as to how to administer initial life-saving procedures. This may improve the survivability of the victims and enable administration of vital medical care even before the arrival of EMS teams. The multi-site terror events, as occurred in Paris and Brussels, exposed a gap in resource management, and the risk of depleting medical equipment and personnel. Analyzing the time stamp of the Twitter photos from the Brussels metro station reveals that casualties waited for as long as 20 min before EMS and other emergency responders reached the scene. Real-time recruiting of civilians as first responders to provide life-saving medical actions may increase the survivability rate. Thus, empowering individuals present on-site to provide such life-saving measures, may prove to be of utmost importance. Twitter presented itself as an important communication channel, which may act as a life-line to the casualties and an asset for the responders. Twitter users who posted photos from the scenes were contacted directly, almost instantly, by journalists requesting additional information, consent to publish their photos, or interviews. Users responded in real-time and provided crucial information from the scene. Similarly, the public can be guided by medical providers to assume responsibility when formal responders are unavailable.
The terror attacks that were inflicted on European cities during the last year exemplified that EMS organizations, as well as other health services, should reassess their response policies. This should include better education of the public sharing photos and information that may harm and invade patients’ privacy. There is a growing rift between the ethical norms which emergency medicine and health services’ professionals adhere to, compared to those that the public adopts while engaging in social media during emergencies. Medical guidelines and policies utilized during the response phase should be modified and adjusted to the new reality that had already changed.
The healthcare system should adopt, use and leverage social media and its advantages in designing response to terror events as well as other types of emergencies, but this requires a re-evaluation and introspection into the current emergency response models.
No funding was provided for this research.
Availability of data and materials
TS conceived and designed the study; TS collected and analyzed the data; TS drafted the manuscript; BA participated in the analysis of the data; AG and BA contributed significantly to its revision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Simon T, Goldberg A, Adini B. Socializing in emergencies- a review of the use of social media in emergency situations. Int J Inf Manag. 2015;35:609–19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reuter C, Ludwig T, Kaufhold MA, Spielhofer T. Emergency Services’ attitudes towards social media: a quantitative and qualitative survey across Europe. Int J Human Comput Stud. 2016;95:96–111.Google Scholar
- Payne A. Brussels attacks: the key pictures and videos. 2016. http://uk.businessinsider.com/brussels-attacks-pictures-and-videos-2016-3. Accessed 25 Jun 2016.Google Scholar
- Tandon G, Twitter. 28 June 2016. https://twitter.com/TheGautamTandon/status/747881773409832960. Accessed 3 Jul 2016.
- Russo RM, Galante JM, Jacoby RC, Shatz DV. Mass casualty disasters: who should run the show? J Emerg Med. 2015;48(6):685–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar