- Letter to the Editor
- Open Access
Airplane transport isolators may loose leak tightness after rapid cabin decompression
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine volume 23, Article number: 16 (2015)
Air medical transport of patients suffering of highly infectious diseases is typically performed employing portable isolation chambers. Although the likelihood of decompression flight emergencies is low, sustainability of the devices used is crucial. When a standard isolation unit was subjected to an explosive cabin decompression of 493 hPa, simulating a 32808 ft flight level accident, leak tightness of the unit was lost due to rupture of the bag caused by over expansion. When the pressure chamber experiment was repeated with a modified unit, distension was minimized by an additional compensation air bag, thus ensuring leak tightness.
To the Editor
The current Ebola epidemic highlights air transport challenges of infectious patients. The Guidance on Air Medical Transport for Patients with Ebola Virus Disease published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend a portable isolation unit to contain infected materials and minimize contamination of the aircraft.  At present, air carriers employ two different devices: smaller single-person isolation units or the larger Aeromedical Biological Containment System, resembling a plastic tent. Under undisturbed flight conditions, both technologies have been shown feasible and effective in preventing contamination. When optimizing our transport protocol, we had to recognize that little is known about safety in case of flight emergencies such as rapid cabin decompression. Accordingly, we tested the effects of an explosive decompression on the sustainability of the chamber currently used in our program (VenIONPIU, TB-Safety Ltd., Frick, Switzerland).
Tests were performed at the Swiss Air Force Aeromedical Center in Dübendorf, Switzerland. In two hypobaric chambers, separated by a standard airplane window size membrane, pressures were adjusted to the typical pressure difference between in-cabin and ambient pressure at 22965, 27886, 32808 and 33464 ft flight level, respectively. To simulate an explosive decompression, the membrane was cracked in four consecutive experiments, resulting in an immediate pressure drop of 360, 424, 493 and 500 hPa (5.22, 6.15, 7.15 and 7.25PsI) within 1.5-3 seconds, respectively. The single-patient isolation unit was mounted on a stretcher as usual and monitored by video surveillance. For each of the first three tests, a new isolation unit was used, whereas in the fourth setting, reproducing a decompression scenario at 33464 ft flight level, a modified unit with an additional air bag designed to compensate volume expansion was employed.
As defined by the law of Boyle and Mariotte, air volume within the patient isolation unit expanded with increasing Δ p by1.6-2.1, respectively, thus causing overexpansion of the bag (Additional file 1). In the third test when Δ p was 493 hPa (7.15PsI), leak tightness of the unit was lost due to a ruptured suture (Figures 1 and 2). When the experiment was repeated with the modified unit (Δ p 500 hPa/7.25PsI), distension of the patient chamber was minor due to the compensation air bag and leak tightness was maintained.
Although incidence of flight emergencies is low, decompression tests of isolation units should be mandatory in order to guarantee safety for air transport of patients with hemorrhagic fever, SARS, asian flu and others. Leak tightness of can be improved with an additional air bag.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Guidance on Air Medical Transport for Patients with Ebola Virus Disease [http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/healthcare-us/emergency-services/air-medical-transport.html]
This study was supported in part by the Swiss Air Force, and the Swiss Air Rescue.
RA applied for a patent addressing the reservoir air bag.
AK and WGV have no competing of interests.
AK and RA performed the experiment. WGV prepared the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Additional file 1:
Videoclip demonstrating overexpansion of the isolation bag during explosive decompression.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Albrecht, R., Kunz, A. & Voelckel, W.G. Airplane transport isolators may loose leak tightness after rapid cabin decompression. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 23, 16 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-015-0090-6
- Air medical transport
- Infectious diseases
- Isolation chamber