Volume 23 Supplement 2

London Trauma Conference 2014

Open Access

Profile of cyclists with head injury admitted to a London Major Trauma Centre

  • Anna E Forbes1Email author,
  • John M Schutzer-Weissmann1,
  • Matthew Wordsworth1 and
  • Mark H Wilson1
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine201523(Suppl 2):A12

https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-23-S2-A12

Published: 11 September 2015

Background

As the number of cyclists in Britain continues to grow [1], interest in cycle safety has increased. The aim of this study was to identify patient characteristics, mechanisms of injury and injury patterns in cyclists with head injury admitted to a London Major Trauma Centre with a view to identifying factors which could increase cycle safety.

Methods

Cyclists with any head injury requiring admission to hospital between January 1st 2011 and December 31st 2013 were identified from Intensive Care admissions, Emergency Department records, the Trauma Audit and Research Network and patient lists for the Trauma Ward.

After identification of the patient group, data was collected from emergency department and pre-hospital documentation, imaging, toxicology and Intensive Care documentation where relevant.

Results

93 patients were identified with an average age of 37. 89% were male. 54% were not wearing helmets, 20% were wearing helmets and helmet use was not recorded for 26%. The most common mechanisms of injury were cyclists vs car (41%) and falls (38%).

There was no pattern of laterality in terms of intracranial or extracranial injuries. In those with intracranial injury 53% sustained contusions, 49% Subarachnoid haemorrhage, 38% subdural haematoma (SDH) and 23% extradural haematoma (EDH). Where helmet use was recorded no patients wearing a helmet sustained an EDH and only 1 had a SDH.

25% of patients had a significant alcohol history or positive alcohol level where 27% had negative alcohol levels, the remainder had no levels sent.

62% of those not wearing a helmet suffered intracranial injuries compared to 32% of those who were.

Conclusions

Although numbers in this study are small these results suggest that helmet use is protective against intracranial injury.

Additionally 25% of those admitted to hospital with head injury were intoxicated, suggesting that this a risk factor in serious cycling accidents.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Intensive Care Unit and Major Trauma Ward, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

References

  1. Office for National Statistics: Census Analysis – Cycling to Work. 2011, [http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171776_357613.pdf]Google Scholar

Copyright

© Forbes et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement