Systematic training in focused cardiopulmonary ultrasound affects decision-making in the prehospital setting – two case reports
- Louise Kollander Jakobsen†1,
- Morten Thingemann Bøtker†2, 3,
- Lars Peter Lawrence4,
- Erik Sloth5 and
- Lars Knudsen†3, 4Email author
© Jakobsen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 26 January 2014
Accepted: 25 April 2014
Published: 1 May 2014
We present two cases from the Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) in Denmark, in which prehospital physicians trained in cardiac ultrasound (FATE) disclosed significant pathology that induced a radical change for the critical patient’s course.
The need for fast decision-making in the prehospital setting is evident. Often, decisions are based solely on medical history and a perfunctory physical examination. With the development of new handheld ultrasonography devices, it is now possible to perform ultrasonography out-of-hospital. Furthermore, ultrasound in the prehospital setting is pointed out to be one of the five high priority research areas in prehospital medicine.
However, the use of ultrasonography in the prehospital setting is controversial – should we stay-and-play or scoop-and-run?
In order for ultrasonography to improve patient outcome, a balance between time consumption and advantage gained is needed and it is imperial to assess, which patients benefit from examinations that potentially prolong on-scene time, and which do not. Recent case reports show how prehospital focused cardiac ultrasound can be used to guide triage and treatment in prehospital shock management, e.g. life-threatening aortic aneurism and pulmonary embolism[4, 5].
During fall 2012, physicians staffing the Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) in the Central Denmark Region completed a systematical educational program in Focused Assessed Transthoracic Echocardiography (FATE). This comprised of e-learning, one-day hands on FATE course and ten supervised real-time examination in patients admitted to hospital.
In the following, we present two cases from the HEMS after this educational program in which focused ultrasonography significantly contributed to prehospital decision-making.
A 55-year-old otherwise healthy male developed sudden shortness of breath during a bike ride, making it impossible to continue the trip. The Emergency Medical Communication Center (EMCC) was contacted and a local ambulance and a Helicopter Emergency Medical Service, staffed with an emergency physician, were dispatched. A standard prehospital medical evaluation including 12 lead ECG was done. Vital parameters followed an unspecific pattern often seen in patients with dyspnea - respiration frequency 25/min, saturation of 93–94% without oxygen supply, heart rate 100–110 bpm and blood pressure of 115/60 mmHg. Physical examination revealed no obvious pathology. ECG showed normal sinus rhythm.
A 60-year-old, otherwise healthy male, developed left hemiparesis and the EMCC was contacted. As the patient was a candidate for thrombolysis because of suspected ischemic stroke, local ambulance and HEMS staffed with emergency physician were dispatched. On arrival of the HEMS, the medical history revealed a slow development of mild chest pain preceding the hemiparesis. Vital parameters were not specific; respiration frequency 20/min, saturation 95% without oxygen supply, heart rate 90 bpm and blood pressure 120/70 mmHg. Physical examination showed slight aphasia and partially paresis of the left arm. ECG showed normal sinus rhythm.
In these cases, focused ultrasonography significantly contributed to decision-making in the prehospital setting. Ultrasonography changed medical treatment and induced a radical change in the patient’s disposition by reducing time to definite treatment as the patients were transported directly to a facility with the necessary resources. Further, because of the prehospital diagnosis, the receiving units were alerted and treatment was initiated upon arrival without delay.
The two cases deal with two of the top five research priorities in physician-provided pre-hospital critical care; systematic training of prehospital personnel and the use of prehospital ultrasound. Based on these cases, prehospital ultrasound can positively affect patient management and the patient pathway. The cases provide additional evidence regarding the benefit of prehospital focused ultrasound in patients with time critical diagnosis. Others have shown benefit in cardiac arrest patients, patients with chest pain and patients with dyspnea. In patients with dyspnea, a recent case has shown, that prehospital lung ultrasound may also be valuable. Cases of lifesaving changes in patient-course based on focused cardiac ultrasound in trauma patients have also been reported[8–10]. However, ultrasound beams do not save lives, the right decisions do. Thus, it is important that focused ultrasonography is not used as a replacement for routine medical history and physical examination. It should be used as a supplement to aid the physician in making the right decision.
This case presentation is only the first step to providing evidence for using focused ultrasound in the prehospital setting. Randomized controlled studies evaluating the impact of this intervention in the field on patient outcomes are needed and international collaboration is highly preferable.
Routine clinical use and clinical research is only achievable with systematic high-quality education. Furthermore,“close at hand” access to ultrasound devices is a perquisite. The Nordic countries have widespread prehospital units staffed by anesthesiologists, a leading position in focused ultrasound education and a broad ultrasound availability, altogether giving ideal foundation for examining the area further.
In these cases, systematic training in focused cardiac ultrasonography significantly contributed to decision-making in the prehospital setting.
Descriptive, hypothesis-generating studies and then outcome-studies on routine clinical use are needed. In order to pursue this, systematic high-quality education is a precondition.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
- Fevang E, Lockey D, Thompson J, Lossius HM: The top five research priorities in physician-provided pre-hospital critical care: a consensus report from a European research collaboration. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011, 19: 57-10.1186/1757-7241-19-57.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Knudsen L, Sandberg M: Ultrasound in pre-hospital care. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011, 55 (4): 377-378. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02400.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brun PM, Chenaitia H, Gonzva J, Bessereau J, Bobbia X, Peyrol M: The value of prehospital echocardiography in shock management. Am J Emerg Med. 2013, 31: 442 e5-7-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fojtik JP, Costantino TG, Dean AJ: The diagnosis of aortic dissection by emergency medicine ultrasound. J Emerg Med. 2007, 32 (2): 191-196. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2006.07.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frederiksen CA, Knudsen L, Juhl-Olsen P, Sloth E: Focus-assessed transthoracic echocardiography in the sitting position: two life-saving cases. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011, 55 (1): 126-129. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02330.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jensen MB, Sloth E, Larsen KM, Schmidt MB: Transthoracic echocardiography for cardiopulmonary monitoring in intensive care. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004, 21: 700-707. 10.1097/00003643-200409000-00006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zechner PM, Aichinger G, Rigaud M, Wildner G, Prause G: Prehospital lung ultrasound in the distinction between pulmonary edema and exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Emerg Med. 2010, 28 (3): 389.e1-2-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heegaard W, Hildebrandt D, Reardon R, Plummer D, Clinton J, Ho J: Prehospital ultrasound diagnosis of traumatic pericardial effusion. Acad Emerg Med. 2009, 16 (4): 364-10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00379.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barthélémy R, Bounes V, Minville V, Houze-Cerfon CH, Ducassé JL: Prehospital mechanical ventilation of a critical cardiac tamponade. Am J Emerg Med. 2009, 27 (8): 1020.e1-3-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Byhahn C, Bingold TM, Zwissler B, Maier M, Walcher F: Prehospital ultrasound detects pericardial tamponade in a pregnant victim of stabbing assault. Resuscitation. 2008, 76 (1): 146-148. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.07.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rudolph SS, Sørensen MK, Svane C, Hesselfeldt R, Steinmetz J: Effect of prehospital ultrasound on clinical outcomes of non-trauma patients-A systematic review. Resuscitation. 2014, 8 (1): 21-30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.