Skip to main content
Download PDF

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation during hyperbaric oxygen therapy: a comprehensive review and recommendations for practice

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine volume 31, Article number: 57 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) presents unique challenges due to limited access to patients in cardiac arrest (CA) and the distinct physiological conditions present during hyperbaric therapy. Despite these challenges, guidelines specifically addressing CPR during HBOT are lacking. This review aims to consolidate the available evidence and offer recommendations for clinical practice in this context.

Materials and methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL using the search string: “(pressure chamber OR decompression OR hyperbaric) AND (cardiac arrest OR cardiopulmonary resuscitation OR advanced life support OR ALS OR life support OR chest compression OR ventricular fibrillation OR heart arrest OR heart massage OR resuscitation)”. Additionally, relevant publications and book chapters not identified through this search were included.

Results

The search yielded 10,223 publications, with 41 deemed relevant to the topic. Among these, 18 articles (primarily case reports) described CPR or defibrillation in 22 patients undergoing HBOT. The remaining 23 articles provided information or recommendations pertaining to CPR during HBOT. Given the unique physiological factors during HBOT, the limitations of current resuscitation guidelines are discussed.

Conclusions

CPR in the context of HBOT is a rare, yet critical event requiring special considerations. Existing guidelines should be adapted to address these unique circumstances and integrated into regular training for HBOT practitioners. This review serves as a valuable contribution to the literature on “CPR under special circumstances”.

Introduction

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is a therapeutic modality involving the inhalation of near 100% oxygen at pressures exceeding sea level atmospheric pressure (> 100 kilopascals (kPa)) [1]. HBOT has emerged as the standard of care for numerous acute and chronic medical conditions including decompression sickness, carbon monoxide poisoning, chronic wound care, delayed radiation injury, and other conditions necessitating hyperoxygenation [2][3]. The therapy addresses decompression sickness and gas embolism by increasing pressure, reducing the gas bubble size, and subsequently enhancing tissue oxygenation [4]. This results in elevated oxygen levels in the blood (hyperoxemia) and tissues (hyperoxia) [5]. Table 1 lists additional physiological aspects of HBOT.

In recent years, the application of HBOT has expanded to treat critically and chronically ill patients, presenting new challenges and potential benefit [2]. Given the critical nature of patients requiring HBOT, and the numerous potential side effects associated with the therapy, adverse events are relatively common, with the possibility of rapid patient deterioration [2]. Medical emergencies, including cardiac arrest (CA), may arise during HBOT, necessitating structured management and mental preparation that considers the unique aspects of the hyperbaric environment, including safety aspects [6] [7].

The risk of CA during HBOT affects both acutely and chronically ill patients, with decompensation possible due to the altered atmospheric conditions. Consequently, the structural and environmental differences in a pressure chamber must be acknowledged [6]. HBOT is typically administered in either a monoplace or a multiplace chamber, with the former involving compression and the latter requiring patients to breathe oxygen through a face mask or an endotracheal tube [8]. Depending on the specific indication and corresponding protocol, HBOT sessions can range from several minutes to hours, with treatment frequencies varying from one to three times daily [9][6].

In accordance with the individual treatment protocols, patients inhale 100% oxygen to maximize therapeutic efficacy while also incorporating periods of 21% oxygen to mitigate the risk of oxygen toxicity. Elevated oxygen levels inside of the chamber pose a fire hazard, which has been documented in previous studies [10] [11]. Consequently, the safety of defibrillation during HBOT has been a topic of extensive debate and may impact CPR outcomes in this context [2]. Breathing high-pressure oxygen can lead to oxygen toxicity [11], potentially harming patients and complicating CA treatment. Despite the absence of concrete data on CPR incidence during HBOT, only a limited number of case reports has been published to date.

This narrative review delves into specific aspects of CPR in the context of HBOT. While CPR associated with HBOT appears to be relatively uncommon, this review consolidates recommendations and lessons gleaned from individual case reports, focusing on essential components of CA treatment during HBOT.

Table 1 Physiological aspects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT)
Full size table

Materials and methods

Search strategy

We performed a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and CINAHL up to January 2023 to gather recent data on cardiac arrest in hyperbaric environments. A search string was utilized (see appendix) with PubMed searches conducted within “All Fields”, in EMBASE within “Broad search”. EMBASE subsequently refined our initial search string specifically (see appendix). Cochrane Library was searched within “Title Abstract Keyword”, and word variations were also explored. In CINAHL, we employed the “Boolean/Phrase” search mode and expanded our search by using additional filters, such as “Also search within the full text of articles” and “Apply equivalent subjects”. When possible, we applied a language filter to display articles exclusively in English and German. In addition to the primary search using the above-mentioned strategy, we partially screened articles identified as similar. Articles discovered randomly during our general search on the topic, along with book chapters and secondary literature, were also included. This study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki and received approval from the Ethics Committee of the University of Witten/Herdecke (Nr. S-261/2022). As this work was designed as a narrative review, no database registration was performed.

Inclusion criteria

The primary inclusion criteria encompassed articles describing cardiac arrest, cardiopulmonary resuscitation or defibrillation during HBOT in a decompression chamber. Both patient cases and general information on CPR in the hyperbaric environment were considered. We also included articles containing any other supplementary relevant to our topic. All types of articles were eligible for inclusion, irrespective of their publication year.

Exclusion criteria

Articles that did not align with the content of our inclusion criteria were excluded. Additionally, we excluded full-text articles written in languages other than English or German.

Screening procedure

Following initial record identification, a preliminary selection was conducted by screening article titles and search terms highlighted in abstracts. Duplicates were removed after preselecting all articles. The preselected reports were then tabulated and independently assessed for relevance by two authors using color codes (red - irrelevant, yellow - possibly relevant, green - definitely relevant). Article deemed irrelevant by both authors were excluded. In case of different ratings, a third author served as a referee and provided an additionally rating. All reports classified as possibly or definitely relevant were sought for retrieval.

Full-text articles were independently screened by two authors, focusing on study type, indication for HBOT, hyperbaric chamber type, onset of CPR, data on chest compression, airway management, defibrillation, medication and other pertinent findings related to the hyperbaric environment. After screening, full-texts were color-coded based on their relevance, determining which articles were included.

Upon final inclusion decision, two tables summarizing the most important contents were created. Table 2 encompasses all articles describing reported cases of CPR in the pressure chamber, while Table 3 presents papers with additional data on CPR that do not report factual resuscitation in the hyperbaric environment but are deemed useful for the research question. These tables are provided in the results section.

Results

Our search strategy identified a total of 10.223 publications (PubMed: n = 3739, EMBASE: n = 5403, Cochrane Library: n = 558, CINAHL: n = 523). After the initial screening, we excluded 10.126 records due to lack of relevant content to our research topic. We sought retrieval for the remaining 97 reports, of which we removed 39 duplicates. One report could not be retrieved, leaving 57 full articles identified through our search string for eligibility assessment. In addition to the search string results, we included 25 supplementary articles and book chapters as of January 10th, 2023.

Upon screening the 82 full texts by two authors, 41 reports were excluded as they did not describe cardiac arrest, CPR, or defibrillation during HBOT in a hyperbaric environment. Consequently, we included 41 articles in our review, all of which were attributable to PubMed and EMBASE. No primary search results were derived from CINAHL or the Cochrane Library, although some duplicate articles were found in CINAHL. Figure 1 presents a PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flow chart of the search strategy.

Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) Flowchart (according to Page et al. [46])

Full size image

A total of 18 articles, primarily case reports, described actual CPR events in a hyperbaric pressure chamber, with CPR or defibrillation performed on 22 patients during HBOT. These data are summarized in Table 2. Nine of these cases took place in multiplace hyperbaric chambers, and one case each in a monoplace chamber and a deck decompression chamber. In the other eleven cases the type of pressure chamber was not specified.

Table 2 Reported cases of CPR during hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT)
Full size table

An additional 23 papers provided information or recommendations on emergency treatment or CPR in the hyperbaric setting, which are summarized in Table 3.

Notably, certain physiological peculiarities apply in hyperbaric environments, current resuscitation guidelines will be discussed in the context of HBOT at the end of this review.

Table 3 Further recommendations on specific aspects of CPR during hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT)
Full size table

Discussion

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation during HBOT is rarely reported in the literature. Our study identified a total of 22 cases of CPR related to HBOT since 1989. The mean age was 38.8 years, which is younger than the average patient undergoing CPR in industrial countries. According to the German Resuscitation Registry (GRR) the mean age of out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests (OHCA) in Germany was 70.2 years in 2021 [16]. In the United States, the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) registry reported a mean age of 62 years for the same observation period [17]. Although data on the number of hyperbaric treatments administered world-wide daily are unavailable, it is likely that the number of CPR events in a pressure chamber exceeds published reports.

Dieterich et al. reported 10 cases of resuscitation over a period of 17 years for their pressure chamber center in Bavaria, Germany [6]. However, CPR associated with HBOT appears to be relatively rare. Consequently, adequate preparation and education of all involved parties are crucial. Boet et al. employed a modified Delphi consensus process to identify clinical situations in hyperbaric medicine that could benefit from simulated practice. As a result, five scenarios were deemed relevant for a potential future simulated-based curriculum in hyperbaric therapy [18]:

  • Seizure in the chamber.

  • Fire in or immediately outside the chamber.

  • Cardiac arrest in the chamber.

  • Pneumothorax in the chamber.

  • Technical deficiency, such as power loss while operating the chamber.

All these scenarios pose a direct or indirect life-threatening risk. Therefore, these findings underscore the importance of investigating the optimal standard for CPR in a hyperbaric chamber and should be discussed in the light of the current European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines [19].

Iatrogenic vs. non-iatrogenic cause of CPR

There are currently 14 approved applications for HBOT, such as air or gas embolism, acute thermal burn injury, or carbon monoxide poisoning [5]. In the current study, HBOT followed by CPR was primarily administered in the course of treatment of out-of-hospital events, mainly decompression sickness (DCS) and carbon monoxide intoxication. Among the DCS cases, there was only one instance of air embolism with subsequent CPR caused by hyperbaric therapy itself [20]. This is surprising, as the absolute pressure changes in hyperbaric chambers are the same as those experienced by divers. However, Wolf et al. stated that a slower rate of decompression is used after hyperbaric oxygen therapy compared to an ascending diver, which prolongs the time for gas exchange and reduces the chance of air embolism and barotrauma. Furthermore, divers are more vulnerable to developing panic, predisposing them to laryngospasm and subsequent barotrauma due to prevented exhalation [22]. Thirdly, Pendergast et al. reported an increased lung closing volume under head-out water immersion conditions, which can lead to barotrauma as a consequence of entrapped gas in the terminal airway structures [21]. Additionally, unlike most dives, hyperbaric therapy is conducted under the supervision of medical personal, who can identify potentially life-threatening symptoms and initiate immediate intervention in a well-equipped hospital environment before CPR becomes a necessity [22].

In one other case presented by Murphy et al., hyperbaric therapy led to tension pneumothorax of a young patient treated for carbon monoxide intoxication [23]. In three other cases, the underlying cause of CPR was not associated with hyperbaric therapy but still iatrogenic in nature. The majority of these cases included surgical interventions and/or catherization of arterial or venous blood vessels [6, 48, 50].

Initiation of CPR

Early initiation of CPR is associated with a higher rate of overall survival [24, 25]. The survival rate decreases by 2.1–3.2% for every minute without CPR in the context of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), respectively [26]. However, immediate response to CA during HBOT may not always be feasible due to limited access to the patient and the unique environment of various pressure chambers. Timely identification of CPR need by bystanders or personal can be challenging, particularly in out-of-hospital pressure chambers like diving bells or deck-decompression chambers, which often lack real-time monitoring of patient’s vital parameters and have poor lighting conditions [29]. Due to the hyperoxic environment, pulse oximetry has limited value [27], and transcutaneous O2 sensors may not always be available. Monitoring of ECG and invasive blood pressure requires electrical connections to the chamber exterior [27].

Rapid assistance is crucial once CA is recognized. In spacious pressure chambers, personnel may already be beside the patient during the dive. Otherwise, the chamber must be completely decompressed before personal can access the patient, potentially taking several minutes to prevent DCS barotrauma and additional life-threatening complications. Kot et al. recommended one chamber operator and one physician per patient for monoplace chambers and one chamber operator, up to two internal attendees and one physician per patient for multiplace chambers [28]. However, small monoplace chambers, diving bells, and deck-decompression chambers present challenges due to confined space. Acott et al. described the time-consuming procedure of recovering an unconscious diver into a diving bell, which involves flooding the bell, gearing up, retrieving the diver, and evacuating the bell. Once inside the bell with its hatch closed, access to the diver for CPR initiation remains difficult, as the diver usually lies in a upright position against the bell wall with limited access for resuscitation in every spatial dimension [29].

Recommendation

The interior of the chamber should be equipped with adequate lighting conditions. Monitoring of vital parameters should minimally include blood oxygen saturation using transcutaneous O2 sensors and ECG, and be expanded as necessary for patients requiring intensive care treatment. Depending on the type of pressure chamber, a specific action plan should be developed, detailing concrete steps for initiating CPR. This may include emergency decompression of the chamber, recruiting sufficient personnel to recompress and enter the chamber for CPR (see Table 3). Regular training for HBOT practitioners should incorporate these adapted guidelines to ensure preparedness in the event of CA during HBOT.

Chest compression

In addition to the timely initiation of CPR, the quality of CPR is a crucial factor for overall survival. The American Heart Association (AHA) quality criteria for CPR include [30, 31]:

  • Minimize interruption.

  • Aim for chest compression fraction above 80%.

  • Chest compression rate 100–120/min.

  • Compression depth at least 5 cm in adults.

  • Full chest recoil.

  • Avoid excessive ventilation.

The majority of case reports identified in this review did not provide detailed information on CPR parameters or the adopted CPR algorithm. Nevertheless, CPR may have been performed according to the AHA or ERC (European Resuscitation Council) guidelines. Acott et al. noted that the resuscitator´s position depends on the chamber size and shape, discussing an upright position CPR in a diving bell due to confined space and the patient hanging from a pulley attached to the bell´s interior wall. They argued that efficient chest compressions (CC) in supine position can typically achieve up to 30% of cardiac output, and therefore, CPR with the patient in an upright hanging position is considered inefficient concerning cerebral perfusion and should not be attempted [29]. Bhatnagar et al. identified two CC techniques suitable for confined spaces: one with the rescuer positioned over the patient’s head and one with the rescuer sitting on top of the patient with both legs straddled [32]. If the CPR technique does not allow easy access to the patient’s airways, the 30:2 algorithm should be abandoned, and a compression-only CPR performed [29]. Given the hyperbaric hyperoxygenation typically administered to patients inside the chamber, the benefits of intermediate ventilation compared to chest compression only may be significantly reduced, at least during the first five minutes after cardiac arrest. In this context, maintaining sufficient circulation to transport oxygen to organs should be of upmost importance [6]. However, this contrasts with a study by Weaver et al., who reported two cases of hypoxemia during the first air-breathing period of the applied HBOT scheme [33]. The authors emphasized that patients with severe lung dysfunction and a high degree of venous admixture can become hypoxic despite hyperbaric therapy [33]. Furthermore, Dieterich et al. recommended the use of a mechanical resuscitation aid if a patient still requires resuscitation after decompression to avoid significant delays in CPR during transport out of the chamber [6].

Recommendation

CPR should be performed in a supine position on a solid surface. Several CC techniques, such as the straddle variant, can be executed in confined spaces. If 100% oxygen was administered, it might be beneficial to forgo intermittent ventilation in favour of continuous CC. Regular training for HBOT practitioners should integrate these adaptations to ensure preparedness and improve patient outcomes in the event of cardiac arrest during HBOT.

Defibrillation

Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is the main cause of cardiac arrest, for which the most effective treatment is defibrillation [34]. In the context of OHCA, the survival rate decreases by 2.1% for every minute without defibrillation [26]. However, during HBOT, administering high voltage pulses in a hyperoxygenated environment presents significant safety hazards [35]. Several studies argue that the use of portable defibrillators inside the chamber poses risks, such as [6, 35]:

  • Potential fire due to high voltage electronics.

  • Implosion of the vacuum-filled CRT monitors.

  • Device malfunction under hyperbaric conditions.

  • Operator error resulting from nitrogen narcosis or decompression sickness.

In general, placing the defibrillator outside the chamber is recommended. The main device is connected to the chest paddles inside the chamber via a penetrator through the chamber wall, allowing both heart rhythm monitoring and electric shock application. Dieterich et al. demonstrated in their simulation training that even without pre-attached patches, the time between CA recognition and the first shock was within a reasonable two-minute period for unanticipated defibrillation cases [6]. Monoplace chambers should be switched from oxygen to ambient air during decompression. If this is not possible, at least 40 s must elapse after opening the chamber for the oxygen to dissipate before defibrillation. Oxygen-enriched garments and other textiles should be removed before shock application, even after decompression [36]. The risk of current transmission to bystanders during shock application is significantly increased. Ensuring proper sufficient earthing of the chamber and the use of grounding footwear can further contribute to staff safety. Biphasic defibrillators, which deliver the same (or better) therapeutic effect compared to monophasic devices using less electrical energy, should be preferred during hyperbaric therapy [35].

Acott et al. discussed performing a precordial thumb for confined spaces with difficulties in providing BLS (e.g., DB or DDC). According to the ERC, this technique is recommended only in witnessed and monitored VF or VT within the first 15 s of recognition and only in the absence of a defibrillator. The AHA neither explicitly supports nor opposes the use of the precordial thump. Some authors do not recommend its use [37], while others consider a precordial thumb in case of witnessed VT or VF in absence of a defibrillator [6].

Recommendation

The risk of fire due to defibrillation is of utmost concern during HBOT. Defibrillator should not be stored inside the pressure chamber. The use of biphasic devices placed outside the chamber with connection to chest panels inside should be preferred. If defibrillation is necessary, an FiO2 of 21.5% should not be exceeded at the moment of shock application [38]. Adequate earthing of the chamber, grounding footwear, and maintaining a sufficient distance from the patient must be ensured to avoid current transmission.

Airway management

The optimal airway technique for both out-of-hospital and in-hospital resuscitation remains uncertain [39]. Current guidelines recommend an airway management approach based on patient factors, personnel skills, and the stage of resuscitation [40]. In the context of hyperbaric therapy, additional factors such as number of staff, hyperoxygenation, and confined space must be considered. The Diving Medical Advisory Council (DMAC) publishes a list of medical equipment to be held in a diving bell, which includes the following airway equipment [41]:

  • Resuscitation face masks.

  • 2 Guedel tubes sizes 3 and 4.

  • 1 or 2 supraglottic airway devices.

Acott at al. tested the i-gel® laryngeal mask under hyperbaric conditions and found no changes in consistency or development of bubbles within its thermoplastic material during pressure chamber dives with an atmospheric pressure up to 608 kPa. Unlike other airway devices, the i-gel® does not require an inflatable cuff, eliminating the risk of tissue compression or leakage due to changes in ambient pressure. Given its ease of administration even for untrained or non-medical personal, the authors recommended the i-gel® for usage in resuscitation [42]. Dieterich et al. emphasized the importance of securing the airway within 5 min after initiation of resuscitation for in-hospital pressure chambers [6]. However, they highlighted the importance of continuous cuff pressure monitoring to prevent oxygen leakage (which is particularly relevant in the context of defibrillation). Supraglottic airway devices should be used if endotracheal intubation fails after the first attempt. If resuscitation begins during an oxygen “break” or during decompression, the time until the airways is secured should not exceed three to four minutes.

Recommendation

If feasible, the airway should be secured with an endotracheal tube within 5 min after CA was detected. If endotracheal intubation would disproportionately delay the process, a laryngeal mask offers an alternative that can be administered quickly and with easily handling in terms of ambient pressure changes. The i-gel® laryngeal mask, in particular, has demonstrated utility and stability under hyperbaric conditions, making it a suitable option for airway management during hyperbaric therapy. According to evidence from difficult airway studies [43], it should be recommended to also ensure availability of video laryngoscopy (VL) in case of CPR during HBOT.

Medication

Unlike chest compressions or defibrillation, the efficacy of drugs during resuscitation is still considered contradictory [44]. As of HBOT, the current study found no peculiarities for drug use in pressure chambers. However, there are pitfalls on how to properly store and administer medication, especially in an emergency situation. The confined environment within many pressure chambers requires a standardized storage concept, which should be taught to all medical personal [6]. Lind referred to the fact that continuous infusions (especially inotrope and vasopressor drugs) should be administered via reliable battery-power infusion pump systems that are approved for HBOT. Changes in ambient pressure should be accompanied by increased attention to the infusion pumps, as remaining gas in the syringe and/or tubing can cease drug delivery undetected by the syringe pump. As for monoplace chambers, infusion pumps are primarily located outside the chamber. Thus, drug delivery can become inaccurate since the pump must overcome the chamber overpressure [45]. Other authors highlighted the fact that both plastic and glass infusion bottles should be vented to prevent the risk of gas embolism and explosion (e.g., during rapid decompression) [27].

Recommendation

Establishing a proper IV line should be done prior to HBOT. In case of drug administration during HBOT with no IV line or impossibility to establish, an IO line should be applied. Drug therapy should be administered according to the ERC or AHA guidelines. Plastic and infusion bottles must be properly vented during usage to avoid gas embolisms. Glass bottles are not recommended due to risk of air embolism. Attention should be given to infusion pumps during changes in ambient pressure to ensure accurate drug delivery. Staff should be trained in the standardized storage and administration of medications in the confined environment of pressure chambers to ensure proper handling during emergency situations.

Further considerations

The presence of medical personnel inside a pressure chamber inherently carries the risk of incapacitation of the staff themselves. Special attention should be given to potential dangers such as DCS or barotrauma, especially during emergency decompression while performing physically demanding CC [45]. Effective communication between personnel outside and inside the chamber is crucial during emergency situations and should be practiced regularly through simulation trainings. For further considerations concerning CA during HBOT see also Fig. 2. Post ROSC therapy should follow ERC/AHA recommendations as there is currently no evidence about a specific post ROSC treatment after CPR during HBOT.

Fig. 2
figure 2

– Modified ERC Advanced Life Support algorithm for CPR in the hyperbaric setting

Algorithm modified according to the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) Advanced Life Support (ALS) algorithm and the resuscitation algorithm modified for hyperbaric conditions from Dieterich et al. [6]

ASAP = as soon as possible; CC = chest compression; CPR = cardiopulmonary resuscitation; EAD = extraglottic airway device; ETI = endotracheal intubation; FiO2 = fraction of inspired oxygen; HBOT = hyperbaric oxygen therapy; i.v. = intravenous access; i.o. = intraosseous access; MPHC = multiplace hyperbaric chamber; PEA = pulseless electrical activity; VF = ventricular fibrillation; VT = ventricular tachycardia

Full size image

Conclusion

The exact number of hyperbaric treatments conducted worldwide each year is currently unknown. Nevertheless, resuscitation associated with HBOT appears to be fairly rare, yet remains a life-threatening event. The pressurized chamber environment presents unique challenges to every aspect of the CPR algorithm. The confined space imposes limitation on movement and storage, while dynamic pressure conditions pose potential hazards to personnel, patient, and medical equipment. Fluctuating oxygen partial pressure necessitate continuous monitoring of the patient’s oxygen status and is associated with an increased risk of fire. Moreover, both patients and staff are isolated from the outside world within the pressure chamber, making effective verbal communication particularly crucial.

These factors lead to the essential requirement that all personnel involved in HBOT must thoroughly learn CPR procedures theoretically and practice them hands-on in advance. This work contributes significantly to supplementing the “CPR under special circumstances” chapter, offering valuable insights and recommendations for healthcare professionals working in hyperbaric environments.

Appendix

Search string:

(pressure chamber OR decompression OR hyperbaric) AND (cardiac arrest OR cardiopulmonary resuscitation OR advanced life support OR ALS OR life support OR chest compression OR ventricular fibrillation OR heart arrest OR heart massage OR resuscitation).

Search string adjusted by EMBASE:

(‘pressure chamber’/exp OR ‘pressure chamber’ OR ((‘pressure’/exp OR pressure) AND (‘chamber’/exp OR chamber)) OR ‘decompression’/exp OR decompression OR hyperbaric) AND (‘cardiac arrest’/exp OR ‘cardiac arrest’ OR ((‘cardiac’/exp OR cardiac) AND (‘arrest’/exp OR arrest)) OR ‘cardiopulmonary resuscitation’/exp OR ‘cardiopulmonary resuscitation’ OR (cardiopulmonary AND (‘resuscitation’/exp OR resuscitation)) OR ‘advanced life support’/exp OR ‘advanced life support’ OR (advanced AND (‘life’/exp OR life) AND (‘support’/exp OR support)) OR als OR ‘life support’ OR ((‘life’/exp OR life) AND (‘support’/exp OR support)) OR ‘chest compression’/exp OR ‘chest compression’ OR ((‘chest’/exp OR chest) AND (‘compression’/exp OR compression)) OR ‘ventricular fibrillation’/exp OR ‘ventricular fibrillation’ OR (ventricular AND (‘fibrillation’/exp OR fibrillation)) OR ‘heart arrest’/exp OR ‘heart arrest’ OR ((‘heart’/exp OR heart) AND (‘arrest’/exp OR arrest)) OR ‘heart massage’/exp OR ‘heart massage’ OR ((‘heart’/exp OR heart) AND (‘massage’/exp OR massage)) OR ‘resuscitation’/exp OR resuscitation).

References

  1. Gottfried I, Schottlender N, Ashery U. Hyperbaric oxygen treatment— from mechanisms to cognitive improvement. Biomolecules 2021;11(10):1520.

  2. Mathieu D, Marroni A, Kot J. Tenth European Consensus Conference on Hyperbaric Medicine: recommendations for accepted and non-accepted clinical indications and practice of hyperbaric oxygen treatment. Diving Hyperb Med J. 47(1).

  3. Vann RD, Butler FK, Mitchell SJ, Moon RE. Decompression illness. The Lancet 2011;377(9760):153–64.

  4. Doolette DJ, Mitchell SJ. Hyperbaric Conditions. In: Terjung R, Editor. Comprehensive Physiology [Internet]. 1. edition. Wiley; 2010. Pages 163–201 [Accessed 06–03–2023]. Available under https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cphy.c091004.

  5. Ortega MA, Fraile-Martinez O, García-Montero C, Callejón-Peláez E, Sáez MA. Álvarez-Mon MA, A General Overview on the hyperbaric oxygen therapy: applications, Mechanisms and Translational Opportunities. Medicina (Mex). August 2021;57(9):864.

  6. Dieterich F, Kanstinger A, Erdmann M, Knebel J, Ott B, Schöppenthau H. Implementierung eines regelmäßigen reanimationstrainings an einem Druckkammerzentrum [Implementation of regularly performed resuscitation training at a hyperbaric treatment center]. Anaesthesist. 2016 Mar;65(3):203–11.

  7. Moon R. Indications for Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy [Accessed 06-03-2023]. Available under: https://www.uhms.org/resources/hbo-indications.html.

  8. Kirby JP, Snyder J, Schuerer DJE, Peters JS, Bochicchio GV. Essentials of hyperbaric oxygen therapy: 2019 review. Mo Med. 2019;116(3):176–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lam G, Fontaine R, Ross FL, Chiu ES. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy: exploring the clinical evidence. Adv Skin Wound Care April. 2017;30(4):181–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Raman G, Kupelnick B, Chew P, Lau JA, Horizon Scan. Uses of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2006 [Accessed 06–03–2023]. Available under: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK299143/.

  11. Foley K, Banham N, Bonnington S, Gawthrope I. Oxygen toxicity seizure mimics. Diving Hyperb Med. 2021 Jun 30;51(2):161–166.

  12. UHMS-Accredited Clinical Hyperbaric Medicine Facilities. Undersea Hyperb. Med J Undersea Hyperb Med Soc Inc. 2016;43(1):xiii–xxiv. 2006 [Accessed 06–03–2023]. Available under: UHM Journal: Volume 43 (2016) (uhms.org).

  13. Wiese S, Beckers S, Siekmann U, Baltus T, Rossaint R, Schröder S. Hyperbare Sauerstofftherapie: Notfall- und intensivmedizinische Besonderheiten [Hyperbaric oxygenation: characteristics of intensive care and emergency therapy]. Anaesthesist. 2006 Jun;55(6):693–705.

  14. Sahni T, Singh P, John MJ. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy: current trends and applications. J Assoc Physicians India. 2003 Mar;51:280–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bonnington S, Banham N, Foley K, Gawthrope I. Oxygen toxicity seizures during United States Navy Treatment Table 6: An acceptable risk in monoplace chambers? Diving Hyperb Med. Jun 2021;51(2):167–72.

  16. Fischer M, Wnent J, Gräsner J–T, Seewald St, Brenner S, Bein B et al. Jahresbericht des Deutschen Reanimationsregisters: Außerklinische Reanimation 2021. [Annual report of the German Resuscitation Register: out-of-hospital resuscitation 2021.] An?sth Intensivmed 2022;63:V116–V122. https://doi.org/10.19224/ai2022.V116

  17. The Cares Group. 2021 Cares Annual Report 24. Available from: https://mycares.net/sitepages/uploads/2022/2021_flipbook/index.html?page=24. Accessed 09 Apr 2023.

  18. Boet S, Burns JK, Jenisset E, Papp M, Bourbonnais S, Pignel R. A Delphi study to identify relevant scenarios as the first step toward an international hyperbaric medicine simulation curriculum. Diving Hyperb Med. 2022 Mar 31;52(1):44–48.

  19. Lott C, Truhlář A, Alfonzo A, Barelli A, González-Salvado V, Hinkelbein J, Nolan JP, Paal P, Perkins GD, Thies KC, Yeung J, Zideman DA, Soar J; ERC Special Circumstances Writing Group Collaborators. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Cardiac arrest in special circumstances. Resuscitation. 2021 Apr;161:152–219.

  20. Kjeld T, Hansen EG, Holler NG, Rottensten H, Hyldegaard O, Jansen EC. Resuscitation by hyperbaric exposure from a venous gas emboli following laparoscopic surgery. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012;20(1):51.

  21. Pendergast DR, Moon RE, Krasney JJ, Held HE, Zamparo P. Human Physiology in an Aquatic Environment. In: Terjung : Comprehensive Physiology [Internet]. 1. Edition. Wiley; 2015. Pages 1705–50. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c140018. Accessed 08 Mar 2023

  22. Wolf HK, Moon RE, Mitchell PR, Burger PC. Barotrauma and Air Embolism in Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy. Am J Forensic Med Pathol Juni. 1990;11(2):149–53.

  23. Murphy DG, Sloan EP, Hart RG, Narasimhan K, Barreca RS. Tension pneumothorax associated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Am J Emerg Med. 1991;9(2):176–9.

  24. Hasselqvist-Ax I, Riva G, Herlitz J, Rosenqvist M, Hollenberg J, Nordberg P, Ringh M, Jonsson M, Axelsson C, Lindqvist J, Karlsson T, Svensson L. Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med.2015 Jun 11;372(24):2307–15.

  25. Cummins RO, Eisenberg MS, Hallstrom AP, Litwin PE. Survival of out-ofhospital cardiac arrest with early initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med. 1985 Mar;3(2):114–9.

  26. Larsen MP, Eisenberg MS, Cummins RO, Hallstrom AP. Predicting survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a graphic model. Ann Emerg Med. 1993 Nov;22(11):1652–8.

  27. Muth CM, Radermacher P. Urgences hyperbares et maladie de décompression. Méd. Intensive. Réca. [Internet]. 27 juill. 2015, 24(5):551–6. Available from: https://revuemir.srlf.org/index.php/mir/article/view/1010. Accessed 11 Sept 2023.

  28. Kot J. Staffing and training issues in critical care hyperbaric medicine. Diving Hyperb Med. 2015 Mar;45(1):47–50.

  29. Acott CJ. Basic life support in a diving bell and deck decompression chamber. Diving Hyperb Med. 2008 Jun;38(2):159–62.

  30. Nolan JP. High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014 Jun;20(3):227–33.

  31. Meaney PA, Bobrow BJ, Mancini ME, Christenson J, de Caen AR, Bhanji F, Abella BS, Kleinman ME, Edelson DP, Berg RA, Aufderheide TP. CPR Quality Summit Investigators ?the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee ?and the Council on Cardiopulmonary ?Critical Care ?Perioperative and Resuscitation. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality:[Corrected] Improving cardiac resuscitation outcomes both inside and outside the hospital: A consensus statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013 Jul 23;128(4):417–35.

  32. Bhatnagar V, Jinjil K, Dwivedi D, Verma R, Tandon U. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: unusual techniques for unusual situations. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2018;11(1):31.

  33. Weaver LK, Churchill SK. Hypoxemia with air breathing periods in U.S. NAVY Treatment table 6. Undersea Hyperb Med J Undersea Hyperb Med Soc Inc. 2006;33(1):11–5.

  34. Gu W, Li CS. What is more important: defibrillation or compression? J Thorac Dis. 2016 Aug;8(8):E778–80.

  35. Pitkin A. Defibrillation in hyperbaric chambers: a review. J R Nav Med Serv. 1999;85(3):150–7.

  36. Weaver LK. Hyperbaric oxygen in the critically ill. Crit Care Med. 2011 Jul;39(7):1784–91.

  37. Acott CJ. Basic life support in a diving bell and deck decompression chamber. Diving Hyperb Med. 2008 Jun;38(2):159–62.

  38. Kot J. Medical devices and procedures in the hyperbaric chamber. Diving Hyperb Med. 2014 Dec;44(4):223–7.

  39. Vogt L, Sellmann T, Wetzchewald D, Schwager H, Russo S, Marsch S. Effects of Bag Mask Ventilation and Advanced Airway Management on Adherence to Ventilation Recommendations and Chest Compression Fraction: A Prospective Randomized Simulator-Based Trial. J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 29;9(7):2045.

  40. Newell C, Grier S, Soar J. Airway and ventilation management during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and after successful resuscitation. Crit Care. 2018 Aug 15;22(1):190.

  41. Committee TDMA. Medical Equipment to be Held at the Site of an Offshore Diving Operation 2021 Available from: https://www.dmac-diving.org/guidance/DMAC15.pdf. Accessed 11 Sept 2023.

  42. Acott CJ. Extraglottic airway devices for use in diving medicine - part 3: the i-gel™. Diving Hyperb Med. 2008 Sep;38(3):124–7.

  43. Hansel J, Rogers AM, Lewis SR, Cook TM, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 4;4(4):CD011136. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub3.

  44. Lundin A, Djärv T, Engdahl J, Hollenberg J, Nordberg P, Ravn-Fischer A, Ringh M, Rysz S, Svensson L, Herlitz J, Lundgren P. Drug therapy in cardiac arrest: a review of the literature. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2016Jan;2(1):54–75.

  45. Lind F. A pro/con review comparing the use of mono- and multiplace hyperbaric chambers for critical care. Diving Hyperb Med. 2015 Mar;45(1):56–60.

  46. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71.

  47. Bayrakci B. Preservation of organs from brain dead donors with hyperbaric oxygen. Pediatr Transplant. 2008 Aug;12(5):506–9.

  48. Burcharth J, Burgdorf S, Lolle I, Rosenberg J. Successful resuscitation after carbon dioxide embolism during laparoscopy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Jun;22(3):e164–7.

  49. Erdmann M, Schöppenthau H, Böttner J. Hyperbare Oxygenierung bei Kohlenmonoxid-intoxikation: Fallbericht einer schweren Intoxikation durch Autoabgase [Hyperbaric oxygen for carbon monoxide poisoning: case report of severe poisoning due to exhaust fumes]. Anaesthesist. 2009 Jun;58(6):589–93.

  50. Frye RE. Cerebral arterial gas embolism following cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. J Pediatr Neurol. 2007;5(2):179–180.

  51. Lalieu RC, Bol Raap RD, Dubois EF, van Hulst RA. Sudden death after oxygen toxicity seizure during hyperbaric oxygen treatment: Case report. Diving Hyperb Med. 2020 Jun 30;50(2):185–188.

  52. Machicado JD, Davogustto G, Burgeois S, Kaldis P, Jani PP, Gidwani R. Fatal air embolism. A rare complication of bronchogenic cysts in an airplane passenger. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Jul 15;188(2):249–50.

  53. Maples CJ, Martin SW, Lo BM. Air in the right ventricle after a deep dive. Resuscitation. 2008 Nov;79(2):187–8.

  54. Mendez N, Huchim-Lara O, Rivera-Canul N, Chin W, Tec J, Cordero-Romero S. Fatal cardiopulmonary decompression sickness in an untrained fisherman diver in Yucatán, Mexico: a clinical case report. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2017 May–Jun;44(3):279–281.

  55. Quescada S et al. Abstracts of ESICM LIVES 2011, the 24th Annual Congress of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. October 1–5, 2011. Berlin Germany. Intensive Care Med. 2011 Sep;37 Suppl 1:S6–314.

  56. Sloan EP, Murphy DG, Hart R, Cooper MA, Turnbull T, Barreca RS, Ellerson B. Complications and protocol considerations in carbon monoxide-poisoned patients who require hyperbaric oxygen therapy: report from a ten-year experience. Ann Emerg Med. 1989 Jun;18(6):629–34.

  57. Van Meter K. Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy as an Adjunct to Pre-hospital Advanced Trauma Life Support. Surg Technol Int. 2011 Dec;21:61–73.

  58. Weaver LK. Operational use and patient care in the monoplace hyperbaric chamber. Respir Care Clin N Am. 1999 Mar;5(1):51–92.

  59. Wright KT, Praske SP, Bhatt NA, Magalhaes RM, Quast TM. Treatment of cardiac arrest in the hyperbaric environment: key steps on the sequence of care–case reports. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2016 Jan–Feb;43(1):71–8.

  60. Jian X, Guo G, Ruan Y, Lin D, Zhao B. Severe keloids caused by hydrogen cyanide injury: a case report. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2008;27(2):97–101.

  61. Jain KK. Textbook of Hyperbaric Medicine [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-47140-2. Accessed 29 Mar 2023.

  62. Millar IL. Hyperbaric intensive care technology and equipment. Diving Hyperb Med. 2015 Mar 1;45(1):50–6.

  63. Paganini M, Mormando G, Savino S, Garetto G, Tiozzo G, Camporesi EM, Fabris F, Bosco G. Emergency Medicine Cases in Underwater and Hyperbaric Environments: The Use of in situ Simulation as a Learning Technique. Frontiers in Physiology. 2021 May 21;12:666503.

  64. Paetow G et al. In-situ simulation for the detection of latent risk threats in a hyperbaric medicine department. Undersea Hyperb Med. Available from: https://www.uhms.org/uhm-search/uhm-journal-volume-47-2020/number-2/in-situ-simulation-for-the-detection-of-latent-risk-threats-in-a-hyperbaric-medicine-department.html. Accessed 29 Mar 2023.

  65. Acott CJ. The use of extraglottic airway devices in diving medicine-a review of the literature. Part 2: Airway management in a diving bell and deck decompression chamber. Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine. 2007 Mar 1;37(1):16–24.

  66. Boet S, Burns JK, Jenisset E, Papp M, Bourbonnais S, Pignel R. A Delphi study to identify relevant scenarios as the first step toward an international hyperbaric medicine simulation curriculum. Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine. 2022 Mar 31;52(1):44–48.

  67. Cales RH, Humphreys N, Pilmanis AA, Heilig RW. Cardiac arrest from gas embolism in scuba diving. Annals of emergency medicine. 1981 Nov 1;10(11):589–92.

  68. Jüttner B, Wölfel C, Liedtke H, Meyne K, Werr H, Bräuer T, Kemmerer M, Schmeißer G, Piepho T, Müller O, Schöppenthau H. Diagnosis and treatment of diving accidents: New German guidelines for diving accidents 2014–2017. Der Anaesthesist. 2015 Jun;64:463–8.

Download references

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany

    Jan Schmitz

  2. Department of Sleep and Human Factors Research, Institute of Aerospace Medicine, German Aerospace Center, 51147, Cologne, Germany

    Jan Schmitz

  3. German Society of Aerospace Medicine, 80331, Munich, Germany

    Jan Schmitz, Felix Liebold & Jochen Hinkelbein

  4. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Leipzig, 04103, Leipzig, Germany

    Felix Liebold

  5. University Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden, Ruhr-University Bochum, 32429, Minden, Germany

    Jochen Hinkelbein

  6. Department of Anesthesiology I, University Witten/Herdecke, 58455, Witten, Germany

    Sophia Nöhl, Serge C Thal & Timur Sellmann

  7. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Wuppertal, University Witten/Herdecke, 42283, Wuppertal, Germany

    Serge C Thal

  8. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Ev. Bethesda Hospital Duisburg, 47053, Duisburg, Germany

    Timur Sellmann

Authors
  1. Jan Schmitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Felix Liebold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jochen Hinkelbein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sophia Nöhl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Serge C Thal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Timur Sellmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timur Sellmann.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schmitz, J., Liebold, F., Hinkelbein, J. et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation during hyperbaric oxygen therapy: a comprehensive review and recommendations for practice. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 31, 57 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-023-01103-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-023-01103-y

Keywords

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine

ISSN: 1757-7241