Controlled automated reperfusion of the whole body after 120 minutes of Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: first clinical report
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 19 April 2017
Accepted: 27 June 2017
Published: 10 July 2017
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is associated with a high mortality rate. Furthermore, the few survivors often have severe, persistent cerebral dysfunction. A potential cause for this unsatisfactory outcome after CPR is the combination of cardiac arrest (ischemia) and the inability to restore adequate hemodynamics during conventional CPR (reperfusion), resulting in ischemia/reperfusion injury of the whole body. Therefore we developed a concept counteracting this ischemia/reperfusion injury during the process of CPR.
We present data from a patient, in whom the concept of a novel controlled automated reperfusion of the whole body (CARL) was applied after 120 min of CPR under normothermic conditions. The patient survived without cerebral deficits and showed full recovery of all organs after prolonged cardiac arrest (CA) except for the spinal cord, where a defect at the level of the 11th thoracic vertebra caused partial loss of motoric function of the legs.
This is the first reported clinical application of CARL after CA. The implementation of CARL resulted in unexpected survival and recovery after prolonged normothermic CA and CPR. In synopsis with the preclinical experience in pigs this case shows, that the new concept of CARL treating ischemia/reperfusion during the CPR may be an important element within the future treatment of CA.
Trial was retrospectively registered in the “German Clinical Trials Register” (www.germanctr.de) under No.: DRKS00005773 on July 28th, 2015.
KeywordsCardiopulmonary resuscitation ECPR Controlled reperfusion Reperfusion injury Extracorporeal circulation ACLS ECLS VA-ECMO Spinal ischemia
Despite continuous efforts, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is still associated with high mortality and many survivors suffer from neurological complication [1–3]. Currently, re-establishment of circulation is the main goal in patients undergoing CPR, either manually or with the help of extracorporeal circulatory support devices [4–8]. However, from a pathophysiological point of view, an individual who experiences acute circulatory arrest (CA) requires individualized, continuous reperfusion in order to limit generalized ischemia/reperfusion injury to the whole body [9, 10]. All currently available CPR methods only provide some sort of hemodynamic support, leaving a substantial gap in the therapeutic approach of the life-threatening situation of acute CA. On the basis of this important clinical demand, we developed in preclinical studies a novel whole-body reperfusion protocol (Controlled Automated Reperfusion of the whoLe body—CARL) over the last 10 years [11–13]. After approval of the ethics-committee, CARL has been used in a total of 13 patients with extremely prolonged CPR (unpublished data). The patient discussed in the current case report was the 4th in the row of these 13 patients, distinguished from the other cases by the fact that it was a) the first surviving patient with cerebral recovery treated with CARL, b) the patient with the longest CPR-duration (120 min) and c) the patient with the lowest arterial blood-pH (6.8) with survival and cerebral recovery thereafter. The following report describes the course of this a patient undergoing extremely prolonged CPR with subsequent CARL-therapy.
We report the case of a 44-year-old woman who underwent CPR for 120 min after CA followed by CARL for 60 min. The patient experienced an acute onset of severe chest pain at her home that was followed by CA. Family members called emergency services and started basic life-support procedures. When the medical team arrived, the patient was not responsive to several cycles of advanced circulatory life support. In this devastating situation, the onsite team decided to transport the patient to our medical center to obtain access to a mechanical circulatory support device. During transport, the medical team continued CPR with chest compressions using the LUCAS™-system (Physio-Control; Lund/Sweden).
The patient arrived at the hospital 90 min after the initial CA. Under the conditions of ongoing CPR, her arterial blood pH at this time was 6.8. Decision for CARL was made by an interdisciplinary team of a cardiologist, cardiovascular surgeon and an intensive-care physician and cannulation of the femoral artery and vein in preparation for the CARL treatment was started immediately. However, access to the very small and spastic femoral artery was difficult and time-consuming. Finally, after successful femoral cannulation (17 Ch arterial, 23 Ch venous; HLS cannula Maquet, Rastatt/Germany) and a total time of exactly 120 min of CPR, blood circulation was provided via a new type of extracorporeal circulation device (controlled, integrated resuscitation device [CIRD]). This device was developed by our group in order to facilitate CARL, i.e. treatment of the previously ischemic whole body. Chest compressions were terminated with the start of the CIRD. In order to prevent ischemia of the leg, an additional sheath (8.5 Ch., Arrow, Everett/USA) was been inserted into the femoral artery distal of the arterial cannula and connected to the arterial cannula.
After initiation of the CIRD, the ongoing and previously uncorrectable ventricular fibrillation was converted into asystole with the application of a bolus of intravenous potassium analogue secondary cardioplegia used in cardiac surgery. Shortly thereafter, the heart regained a stable sinus rhythm. Immediately after initiation of CARL-therapy, coronary angiography was done via the contralateral femoral artery. Parallel to the CARL therapy, an acute occlusion of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery was diagnosed. PCI was performed and a drug-eluting coronary stent was implanted. CARL was applied for 60 min, followed by continuous extracorporeal circulatory support by the CIRD for 3 days.
Full recovery of cerebral function after 120 min of continuous CPR following CA in a normothermic setting is an extremely rare event . The course of this case indicates the potential of CARL. However, the process of CPR, somewhat typical in these cases, deserves closer attention. First of all, the question arises of how long resuscitative attempts should be extended before they are declared unsuccessful. The relevant CPR guidelines are limited regarding CPR duration and time-frames, despite the common practice in an out-of-hospital setting to perform CPR for 30 to 45 min before considering termination in non-responsive patients [15, 16]. Current CPR guidelines focus on optimized perfusion-flow and pressure generated by accurately performed chest compressions [6, 17]. Medical devices (e.g. LUCAS™, Physio-Control; Lund, Sweden) have been developed to substitute high-tech performance for human efforts and support transportation. Although these devices provide a continuously improving quality of manual chest compressions, possible risks of injuring lung, heart, liver, spleen and chest wall have to be considered [18, 19]. Even though the patient was transported using a compression device, the severe metabolic acidosis with high lactate levels and low pH at the time of arrival were indicative of severe ischemia followed by a continued, generalized low-flow/low-pressure situation..
The profound ischemia associated with CA is generally followed by severe cellular injury at the beginning of reperfusion. This triad of symptoms is known as “post-resuscitation syndrome” and has been a major challenge in the treatment of these patients [20, 21]. The therapeutic approach of CARL was developed to limit these detrimental effects. CARL is based mainly on continuous adjustments of reperfusion conditions with the recirculating blood according to the individual readings of the patient. An exemplary and immediate effect of this strategy is the generation of a comparably high and pulsatile blood pressure during extracorporeal circulation. Despite the initial, profound ischemia, which is frequently followed by severe vasoplegia, only low-dose norepinephrine was necessary in this case during the first 60 min of CARL therapy. Supported by the current guidelines recommending extracorporeal circulatory support in CPR, a detailed description of the CARL-protocol became available as part of a standard operating procedure (SOP) within the Heart Center of the Freiburg University before its first use in patients [17, 20] The spinal cord injury underlines the severity of the ischemia caused by the CA and the 120 min of CPR, which obviously resulted in this neurological complication. Spinal cord ischemia after CA has been described previously [22, 23] and is a sign of severe ischemia that is obviously neglected after CPR. The superb clinical outcome of this patient with no neurological deficits after a follow-up of 1 year shows the potential for this novel treatment after CA.
We are aware of the fact, that the result of this case only demonstrates one narrow example and may be not extrapolated generally to other patients. However, the above mentioned reasons are supporting the exceptional character of the medical course. Beyond that, the case report has been performed and evaluated with attention to accepted methodical elements for case studies like significance of the case, unusual general public interest, well-balanced discussion based on the relevant literature and different perspectives regarding the treatment of the medical entity .
In conclusion, this is the first reported clinical application of CARL after CA. The patient suffered a severe ischemic insult after 120 min of conventional CPR following CA: She had a pH of 6.8 and a temporary spinal cord injury. The implementation of CARL using the CIRD −1.0 - system resulted in unexpected survival along with recovery from a spinal cord injury after prolonged CA and CPR. The clinical application of CARL is based on our preclinical research over many years [11–13]. In the near future, we will further improve our CARL technique and develop a mobile CIRD system (CIRD 2.0) that will allow us to start CARL treatment even outside the hospital.
Hospital - resources only. No funding provided by a third party.
Availability of data and materials
Please contact author for data requests.
MU performed CPR at the patient’s home and transferred the patient into the hospital. AS, GT, MU and TW performed treatment of the patient in the cath-lab and the intensive-care unit. FB provided clinical resources and helped to draft the manuscript. CS and CB organized and performed extracorporeal circulation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethics approval granted by the Ethics Committee of Albert-Ludwig University Freiburg/Germany, No.: 86/14 (§23b MPG) on May 15th, 2014.
Consent for publication
Patient consented the anonymized publication of the case.
GT, CB and FB are shareholder of Resuscitec Ltd. GT and CB receive salaries for part-time employment. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Chen LM, Nallamothu BK, Spertus JA, et al. Association between a hospital's rate of cardiac arrest incidence and cardiac arrest survival. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:1186–95.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nolan J, Soar J, Smith GB, et al. Incidence and outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United Kingdom National Cardiac Arrest Audit. Resuscitation. 2014;85:987–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ehlenbach WJ, Barnato AE, Curtis JR, Kreuter W, Koepsell TD, Deyo RA, Stapleton RD. Epidemiologic study of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the elderly. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:22–31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mazzeffi MA, Sanchez P, Herr D, Krause E, Evans C, Rector R, McCormick B, Pham S, Taylor B, Griffith B, Kon Z. Outcomes of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory cardiac arrest in adult cardiac surgery patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.06.014. [Epub ahead of print].
- Chen Y-S, Lin J-W, Yu H-Y, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with assisted extracorporeal life support versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults with in-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational study and propensity analysis. Lancet. 2008;372:554–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brooks SC, Anderson ML, Bruder E, Daya MR, Gaffney A, Otto CW, Singer AJ, Thiagarajan RR, Travers AH. Part 6: Alternative Techniques and Ancillary Devices for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015;18(Suppl 2):S436–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Guenther SP, Brunner S, Born F, Fischer M, Schramm R, Pichlmaier M, Massberg S, Hagl C, Khaladj N. When all else fails: extracorporeal life support in therapy-refractory cardiogenic shock. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49(3):802–9. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezv212. Epub 2015 Jun 23View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Truby L, Naka Y, Kalesan B, Ota T, Kirtane AJ, Kodali S, Nikic N, Mundy L, Colombo P, Jorde UP, Takayama H. Important role of mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;48(2):322–8. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezu478. Epub 2014 Dec 4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Athanasuleas CL, Buckberg GD, Allen BS, Beyersdorf F, Kirsh MM. Sudden cardiac death: directing the scope of resuscitation towards the heart and brain. Resuscitation. 2006;70:44–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Buckberg GD. Controlled reperfusion after ischemia may be the unifying recovery denominator. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140:12–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Trummer G, Foerster K, Buckberg GD, Benk C, Heilmann C, Mader I, Feuerhake F, Liakopoulos O, Brehm K, Beyersdorf F. Successful resuscitation after prolonged periods of cardiac arrest: a new field in cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:1325–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Trummer G, Foerster K, Buckberg GD, Benk C, Mader I, Heilmann C, Liakopoulos O, Beyersdorf F. Superior neurologic recovery after 15 minutes of normothermic cardiac arrest using an extracorporeal life support system for optimized blood pressure and flow. Perfusion. 2014;29:130–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taunyane IC, Benk C, Beyersdorf F, Foerster K, Cristina Schmitz H, Wittmann K, Mader I, Doostkam S, Heilmann C, Trummer G. Preserved brain morphology after controlled automated reperfusion of the whole body following normothermic circulatory arrest time of up to 20 minutes. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw186.
- He F, Xu P, Wei ZH, Zhang J, Wang J. Complete Recovery With the Chain of Survival After a Prolonged (120 Minutes) Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Due to Brugada Syndrome: A Case Report. Medicine (Baltimore). 94 (2015) e1107. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001107.
- Verhaert DV, Bonnes JL, Nas J, Keuper W, van Grunsven PM, Smeets JL, de Boer MJ, Brouwer MA. Termination of resuscitation in the prehospital setting: A comparison of decisions in clinical practice vs. recommendations of a termination rule. Resuscitation. 2016;100:60–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Klein HH, Arntz HR. When to terminate resuscitation in adults? Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2016;141:292–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kleinman ME, Brennan EE, Goldberger ZD, Swor RA, Terry M, Bobrow BJ, Gazmuri RJ, Travers AH, Rea T. Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Part 5. Circulation. 2015;132(18 Suppl 2):S414–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deras P, Manzanera J, Millet I, Charbit J, Capdevila X. Fatal pancreatic injury due to trauma after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation with automatic mechanical chest compression. Anesthesiology. 2014;120:1038–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kralj E, Podbregar M, Kejžar N, Balažic J. Frequency and number of resuscitation related rib and sternum fractures are higher than generally considered. Resuscitation. 2015;93:136–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nolan JP, Soar J, Cariou A, Cronberg T, Moulaert VR, Deakin CD, Bottiger BW, Friberg H, Sunde K. Sandroni C European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Guidelines for Post-resuscitation Care 2015: Section 5 of the European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015. Resuscitation. 2015;95:202–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nolan JP, Neumar RW, Adrie C, Aibiki M, Berg RA, Böttiger BW, Callaway C, Clark RS, Geocadin RG, Jauch EC, Kern KB, Laurent I, Longstreth WT, Merchant RM, Morley P, Morrison LJ, Nadkarni V, Peberdy MA, Rivers EP, Rodriguez-Nunez A, Sellke FW, Spaulding C, Sunde K, Hoek TV. Post-cardiac arrest syndrome: epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and prognostication. A Scientific Statement from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation; the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee; the Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; the Council on Cardiopulmonary, Perioperative, and Critical Care; the Council on Clinical Cardiology; the Council on Stroke. Resuscitation. 2008;79:350–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Turkoz A, Gulcan O, Kizilkilic O, Kocum A, Turkoz R. Spinal cord ischemia caused by cardiac arrest secondary to pericardial effusion. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007;21:91–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cheshire WP, Santos CC, Massey EW, Howard JF. Spinal cord infarction: etiology and outcome. Neurology. 1996;47:321–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yin RK. In: 5t. Edition, editor. Case study Research. Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2014.Google Scholar