Participant type | Main feasibility trial | Inner-city observational sub-study | Staff wellbeing sub-study |
---|---|---|---|
Lay public 999 callers | Calls were excluded where: (i) 999 caller was not at the scene; (ii) 999 call originated from a landline; (iii) 999 call originated from another emergency service e.g. police or fire; (iv) 999 calls where resource (excluding community first responder) would arrive on scene before video livestreaming could be activated; (v) 999 call ended before transfer for activation of video livestreaming; (vi) 999 calls where another incident took priority; and (vii) calls where clinical acuity was found to be lower than the threshold for the study (not major trauma) All callers identified by the dispatchers as a child caller (under 16 years old) and those who selected they are under 16 on the 999-caller survey were excluded | All callers identified by the HEMS dispatchers/APP-CCs as a child caller (under 16 years old) and those who selected they are under 16 on the 999-caller survey were excluded | N/A |
EOC staff | EOC staff not mentioned in the inclusion criteria | EOC staff not mentioned in the inclusion criteria | EOC staff not mentioned in the inclusion criteria |
Trauma patients | Any emergencies of a suspected medical origin (e.g., heart attack or stroke) | Any emergencies of a suspected medical origin (e.g., heart attack or stroke) | N/A |