Skip to main content

Table 4 Characteristics of patients with unstable pelvic ring injury after propensity score matching

From: Imposter or knight in shining armor? Pelvic circumferential compression devices (PCCD) for severe pelvic injuries in patients with multiple trauma: a trauma-registry analysis

 

noPCCD N = 1860

PCCD N = 1860

p value

Male sex [%]

63.0

65.6

0.10

Age [years] ± SD

49.3 ± 20.0

48.5 ± 19.5

0.31

Penetrating trauma mechanism [%]

1.5

1.2

0.47

High energy mechanism—traffic; high falls [%]

90.8

89.1

0.10

ISS [points] ± SD

31.1 ± 14.8

30.7 ± 15.7

0.13

Shock on scene [%]

21.1

20.0

0.47

Unconscious on scene [%]

20.4

18.7

0.21

proximal femur fractures [%]

19.5

19.8

0.836

Prehospital interventions

Intubation [%]

35.2

32.2

0.066

Catecholamine administration [%]

19.6

18.5

0.043

Tranexamic acid administration [%]

20.9

21.7

0.55

Crystalloid Volume given [ml], median (IQR)

1000 (500–1000)

1000 (500–1000)

 0.50

More than 1000 ml of crystalloids given [%]

23.4

23.7

0.85

On scene time [minutes] ± SD

33 ± 17

31 ± 17

0.74

Transportation by helicopter [%]

35.2

34.9

0.84

Hospital treatment and outcome

Treatment in Level 1 hospital [%]

88.7

88.8

0.92

Blood transfusion [%]

29.1

31.2

0.17

Number of pRBC, if transfused [N]

7.1

6.9

0.15

Mass transfusion [%]

6.0

6.6

0.48

Surgical stabilization of pelvis before ICU admission [%]

28.6

36.8

 < 0.001

Angio-embolization [%]

1.7

1.6

0.896

Length of stay on ICU [days], median (IQR)

5 (2–15)

5 (2—15)

0.73

Length of stay in hospital [days], median (IQR)

20 (11–31)

19 (11—32)

0.15