Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of logistic regression analysis for the propensity score predicting pehospital PCCD use 

From: Imposter or knight in shining armor? Pelvic circumferential compression devices (PCCD) for severe pelvic injuries in patients with multiple trauma: a trauma-registry analysis

Predictor

Prevalence

Odds ratio

95CI

Younger age (< 60 years)

3709

1.48

1.31–1.68

Systolic BP (reference: 110 + mmHg)

 0 mmHg / CPR

129

2.09

1.39–3.16

 1–109 mmHg

1756

1.26

1.11–1.43

Unconsciousness on scene

1033

0.67

0.57–0.80

Prehospital volume (reference ≤ 500 ml)

 Up to 1000 ml

1595

1.4

1.22–1.59

 Up to 2000 ml

1003

1.52

1.29–1.79

 More than 2000 ml

250

1.75

1.30–2.36

Tranexamic acid administration

1212

2.91

2.51–3.37

Catecholamine administration

991

1.4

1.17–1.68

High energy trauma (traffic, high fall)

4925

1.42

1.20–1.70

Transportation by helicopter

1813

1.26

1.11–1.43

Destination level 1 hospital

4877

1.62

1.36–1.93

  1. Regression is based on 5726 cases with complete data for all predictors. Nagelkerke’s R2 = 0.157