Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine

Fig. 2

From: Investigating the effects of frailty on six-month outcomes in older trauma patients admitted to UK major trauma centres: a multi-centre follow up study

Fig. 2

Percentage of reported problems in EQ-5D-5 L dimensions for frail and not-frail patients at (A) Discharge. Mobility: Frail 95% vs. Not-frail 64%, p < 0.01, Self-care: Frail 63% vs. Not-frail 35%, p = 0.03, Usual activities: Frail 84% vs. Not-frail 53%, p = 0.01, Pain: Frail 79% vs. Not-frail 64%, p = 0.299, Anxiety/depression: Frail 74% vs. Not-frail 48%, p = 0.04. (B) Follow-up. Mobility: Frail 88% vs. Not-frail 78%, p = 0.511, Self-care: Frail 88% vs. Not-frail 55%, p = 0.01, Usual activities: Frail 94% vs. Not-frail 79%, p = 0.189, Pain: Frail 76% vs. Not-frail 76%, p = 0.999, Anxiety/depression: Frail 76% vs. Not-frail 39%, p < 0.01. (Chi squared tests)

Back to article page

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine

ISSN: 1757-7241