Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of airway registries

From: Airway registries in primarily adult, emergent endotracheal intubation: a scoping review

Name of Airway Registry

Geographic Location

Number of Participating Centres

Total number of patients reported *

Number of Publications Included

Years Active

Location of Intubations

Age (% paediatric patients included)

Most Representative Publication**

ANZEDAR

Australia, New Zealand

43

5063

8 (7 full-text, 1 abstract)

2010- 2019

ED only

All patients (4.8% aged 0–15)

Alkhouri et al., 2017

BCARE

Canada

3

737

3 (3 abstracts)

2017- 2019

ED (53.7%), ICU (30%), ward (16.3%)

17 years or older

Yoo et al., 2018

Chulalongkorn Airway Registry

Bangkok, Thailand

1

226

1 (full-text)

2017- 2018

ED only

18 years or older

Saoraya et al., 2021

Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital Airway Registry

Jakarta, Indonesia

1

231

1 (full-text)

2018- 2019

ED only

All ages (8.7%)

Sulistio et al., 2021

Cleveland Clinic Emergency Airway Registry

Cleveland, USA

1

961

4 (3 full-text, 1 abstract)

2005—2010

ED (70%) and prehospital (30%)

All ages

Phelan et al., 2016

Continuous Quality Improvement Database

Tucson, USA

1

5229

23 (18 full text, 5 abstracts)

2007—2018

ED only

18 years or older

Sakles et al., 2019

DREAM

San Antonio, USA

1

74

1 (full-text)

2020

ED only

18 years or older

Mendez et al., 2021

EDIR

Edinburgh, UK

7

3988

7 (7 full-text)

1999- 2011

ED only

All ages (0.2% aged < 13 years)

Hale et al., 2017

JEANI + II

Japan

14

10,927

7 (7 full-text)

2010—2016

ED only

All ages (3% aged 0–17)

Goto et al., 2017

KEAMR

South Korea

20

10,978

7 (6 full-text, 1 abstract)

2006—2012

ED only

All ages

Kim et al., 2017

King Abdulaziz University Hospital Airway Registry

Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

1

146

1(full-text)

2018- 2020

ED only

All ages

Bakhsh et al., 2021

Middlemore Hospital Airway Registry

Auckland, New Zealand

1

258

1 (poster)

2014

ED only

Not reported

Brainard et al., 2014

NEARI

USA

11

1288

1 (full-text)

1996- 1997

ED only

All ages (13.9% aged 0–18)

Sagarin et al., 2003

NEARII

USA, Canada, Singapore

31

8937

6 (2 abstract, 4 full-text)

1997–2002

ED only

All ages

Walls et al., 2011

NEARIII

USA

25

19,071

36 (12 abstract, 24 full-text)

2002–2018

ED only

 > 17 years old

Nikolla et al., 2022

NERAA

Ireland

11

118

1 (1 full-text)

2020

ED only

16 years or older

Umana et al., 2022

Samsung Medical Centre Emergency Airway Program

Seoul, South Korea

1

1087

4 (4 full-text)

2007- 2017

ED only

18 years or older

Hwang, Park, et al., 2018

Singapore General Hospital Emergency Airway Registry

Singapore

1

2950

5 (2 abstract, 3 full-text)

2000–2016

ED only

All ages

Weng et al., 2021

South African Emergency Department Registry

Johannesburg, South Africa

1

374

1 (full-text)

2015- 2016

ED only

18 years or older

Hart and Goldstein., 2020

The Aberdeen Royal Infirmary Airway Registry

Aberdeen, UK

1

197

1 (abstract)

2015- 2017

ED only

All ages

Yeap et al., 2019

The Alfred Airway Registry

Melbourne, Australia

1

783

2 (2 full-text)

2017- 2020

ED only

All ages

Groombridge et al., 2021

The Royal North Shore Emergency Airway Registry

Sydney, Australia

1***

601

3 (1 abstract, 2 full-text)

2010- 2014

ED only

All ages (7% age < 17 years)

Fogg et al., 2016

  1. ANZEDAR The Australian and New Zealand Emergency Department Airway Registry, BCARE British Columbia Airway Registry for Emergencies, DREAM Defense Registry for Emergency Airway Management,
  2. EDIR Emergency Department Intubation Registry, JEAN Japanese Emergency Airway Network Registry 1 and 2, KEAMR Korean Emergency Airway Management Registry, NEAR National Emergency Airway Registry, NERAA National Emergency Resuscitation Airway Audit
  3. * Largest number of patients available in each registry
  4. **Most recent, full-text, multicentre publication (if available) within each registry
  5. ***One study within this registry included data contributed from a second centre, but it is considered a single centre registry