Table 2 Group comparison intubation performance
NOVICES group n = 60 | HEMS group n = 60 | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
Unaided direct laryngoscopy (OLD, uDL) | |||
uDL FPSR (n, %) | 48 (80.0%) | 50 (83.3%) | .638 |
uDl C&L grade (n, median, IQR) | 2 (1–2) | 2 (1–2) | .158 |
uDL POGO-Score (%, median, IQR) | 61.3 (30.0–100.0) | 80.0 (50.0–100.0) | .104 |
uDL time intubation (s, median, IQR) | 22.0 (16.0–34.6) | 21.0 (12.3–32.6) | .339 |
Augmented direct laryngoscopy (aDL) | |||
aDL FPSR (n, %) | 56 (93.3%) | 57 (95.0%) | .698 |
aDL C&L grade (n, median, IQR) | 2 (1–2) | 1 (1–2) | .119 |
aDL POGO-score (%, median, IQR) | 80.0 (80.0–100.0) | 100.0 (100.0–100.0) | .003 |
aDL time intubation (s, median, IQR) | 32.0 (25.0–41.5) | 26.0 (19.3–34.8) | < .001 |
Augmented videolaryngoscopy (aVL) | |||
aVL FPSR (n, %) | 59 (98.3%) | 60 (100.0%) | .317 |
aVL C&L grade (n, median, IQR) | 1 (1–2) | 1 (1–2) | .842 |
aVL POGO-Score (%, median, IQR) | 100.0 (90.0–100.0) | 100.0 (90.0–100.0) | .626 |
aVL time intubation (s, median, IQR) | 32.0 (24.25–40.0) | 24.0 (19.3–30.0) | < .001 |
Augmented videolaryngoscopy with self-positioning (CONTROL) | |||
CONTROL FPSR (n, %) | 60 (100.0%) | 60 (100.0%) | 1.000 |
CONTROL C&L grade (%, median, IQR) | 1 (1–2) | 1 (1–2) | .593 |
CONTROL POGO-Score (%, median, IQR) | 100.0 (100.0–100.0) | 100.0 (80.0–100.0) | .427 |
CONTROL time intubation (s, median, IQR) | 30.5 (27.0–44.8) | 34.0 (28.3–47.5) | .370 |