Skip to main content

Table 2 Summarised study characteristics

From: The impact of selection criteria and study design on reported survival outcomes in extracorporeal oxygenation cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR): a systematic review and meta-analysis

 

Number of studies that reported characteristics (%)

Prospective median (95% CI)

Retrospective median (95% CI)

Overall median (95% CI)

Demographics

Age*

63/67 (94%)

52 (48–55)

56 (55–58)

56 (54–58)

Male gender (%)

64/67 (95%)

80 (75–84)

74 (71–77)

75 (72–78)

Ischemic heart disease (%)

53/67 (79%)

51 (41–60)

53 (46–61)

53 (46–59)

Smoking (%)

24/67 (36%)

28 (21–38)

28 (25–33)

29 (25–33)

Diabetes (%)

47/67 (70%)

41 (14–75)

25 (21–30)

27 (21–34)

Arrest

Witnessed arrest *(%)

51/67 (76%)

100 (95–100)

100 (37–100)

100 (96–100)

*Cardiac cause (%)

51/67 (76%)

85 (75–92)

90 (83–94)

89 (83–93)

Non-cardiac cause (%)

44/67 (65%)

17 (9–29)

13 (9–19)

14 (10–19)

Bystander CPR *(%)

40/67 (60%)

95 (68–99)

75 (57–87)

80 (66–90)

Shockable rhythm* (%)

56/67 (84%)

70 (51–84)

47 (39–56)

52 (45–60)

Non-shockable rhythm (%)

45/67 (67%)

41 (31–52)

56 (43–69)

52 (41–63)

Time to ECMO (min)

55/67 (82%)

74 (55–94)

57 (53–61)

60 (56–64)

  1. Results are aggregated using random-effects meta-analysis of proportions or means, as appropriate. Data is presented with 95% confidence interval of the pooled values in brackets. CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; IHD, ischemic heart disease
  2. * Represent inclusion criteria commonly used for ECMO CPR