Skip to main content

Table 2 Adequate oral endotracheal tube sizes according to sub groups

From: Ease and difficulty of pre-hospital airway management in 425 paediatric patients treated by a helicopter emergency medical service: a retrospective analysis

 

Adequate

Inadequate (small)

Inadequate (large)

p-value

Gender

    

 Female (n = 133)

107 (80.5%)

6 (4.5%)

20 (15%)

p = 0.467

 Male (n = 210)

176 (83.8%)

4 (1.9%)

30 (14.3%)

Age in years

    

 0–1 (n = 33)

14 (42.4%)

0 (0%)

19 (57.6%)

p < 0.001

 1–2 (n = 37)

30 (81.1%)

0 (0%)

7 (18.9%)

 2–4 (n = 56)

49 (87.5%)

0 (0%)

7 (12.5%)

 4–6 (n = 37)

32 (86.5%)

0 (0%)

5 (13.5%)

 6–8 (n = 32)

27 (84.4%)

1 (3.1%)

4 (12.5%)

 8–10 (n = 30)

27 (90%)

2 (6.7%)

1 (3.3%)

 10–12 (n = 21)

14 (66.7%)

5 (23.8%)

2 (9.5%)

 12–17 (n = 97)

90 (92.8%)

2 (2.1%)

5 (5.1%)

Mission type

    

 Primary (n = 195)

165 (84.6%)

7 (3.6%)

23 (11.8%)

p = 0.253

 Secondary (n = 148)

118 (79.7%)

3 (2.1%)

27 (18.2%)

Medical indication

    

 Trauma (n = 194)

166 (85.6%)

6 (3.1%)

22 (11.3%)

p = 0.114

 Non-trauma (n = 149)

117 (78.5%)

4 (2.7%)

28 (18.8%)

Resuscitation

    

 Yes (n = 72)

53 (73.6%)

5 (6.9%)

14 (19.4%)

p = 0.035

 No (n = 271)

230 (84.9%)

5 (1.8%)

36 (13.3%)

  1. Summary of adequate ET tube size (per age) according to subgroup. Endotracheal tube size copied from the original patient protocol. Adequate ET tube size is indicated by the Microcuff tube manufacturer. Outside a 15% tolerance, ET tube size is judged as inadequate. All ET tubes contained a cuff