Skip to main content

Table 2 Study quality

From: Risk factors for wound complications of closed calcaneal fractures after surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Case–control study

Selection

Comparability

Exposure

Total quality score

Adequate definition of cases

Representativeness of cases

Selection of controls

Definition of controls

Control for important factors or additional factors

Ascertainment of exposure (blinding)

Same method of ascertainment for subjects

Non-response rate

Wu [14]

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

8

Backes [22]

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

7

Ding [16]

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

8

Hao [17]

0

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

6

Court-Brown [21]

0

1

0

1

1

1

0

1

5

Koski [18]

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

7

Al-Mudhaffar [19]

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

8

Folk [20]

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

8

Cohort study

Selection

Comparability

Outcome

Total quality score

Representativeness of the exposed cohort

Selection of the non-exposed cohort

Ascertainment of exposure

Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study

Control for important factors or additional factors

Assessment of outcome

Follow-up was long enough for outcomes to occur

Adequacy of follow up of cohorts

Soni [15]

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

7

Assous [23]

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

7

  1. Note: A study can be awarded a maximum of 1 point for each numbered item within the Selection and Exposure categories. A maximum of 2 points can be given for Comparability.