From: The effect of tertiary surveys on missed injuries in trauma: a systematic review
Author, year, origin | Population (number and description) | Population characteristics (Age, Gender, Mechanism, ISS) | Intervention | Outcome measure | Study design |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Enderson, 1990, Tennessee, USA | 399 admitted trauma patients | Age>15 yrs: 86% | TTS as part of trauma admission form, conducted within 24–48 hours after patient stabilization | Missed injuries – defined as detected as a result of TTS. (Type I) | Prospective cohort study – comparing with historical summary data |
Gender: N/A | |||||
Mechanism: 89% | |||||
Blunt Mean ISS: 21 | |||||
Biffl, 2003 | All admitted trauma patients. | Mean Age: 45.3 vs. 44.5 yrs | Implementation of formal TTS, using standardized form and TTS policy. TS within 24 hours and after ICU discharge | Missed injury rate – defined as injuries detected after 24 hours admission or injuries missed by TTS. (Type II) | Cohort study with before-and-after design |
Rhode Island, USA | Before: 3,412 | Gender: 63% vs. 64% Male | |||
After: 3,442 | Mechanism: N/A | ||||
Mean ISS: 10.7 vs. 10.7 | |||||
Vles, 2003 | All (3,879) admitted trauma patients | Age: N/A | Use of standard trauma forms, TTS and review of radiology within 24 hours | Missed injury rate – Any injury missed on primary and secondary survey. (Type I) | Prospective cohort study |
The Netherlands | Gender: N/A | ||||
Mechanism: N/A | |||||
ISS>16: 1.2% | |||||
Hoff, 2004 | 432 admitted trauma patients | Age: N/A | Formal radiology rounds as part of TTS | Missed injury or ‘new diagnosis’ as result of radiology rounds with trauma surgeons. (Type I) | Prospective cohort study |
Pennsylvania, USA | Gender: N/A | ||||
Mechanism: N/A | |||||
ISS: N/A | |||||
Soundappan, 2004 | 76 children admitted with ISS>9 | Mean Age: 8.5 yrs | TTS performed using standardized from by trauma fellow on day after admission and after extubation | Missed injury rate – Any injury missed on primary and secondary survey. (Type I) | Prospective cohort study |
Sydney, Australia | Gender: 66% Male | ||||
Mechanism: 100% Blunt | |||||
Mean ISS: 15 | |||||
Howard, 2006 | 90 admitted trauma patients | Age: N/A | TTS performed using standardized from by single clinician within 24 hours | Missed injury rate – Any injury detected on the TTS. (Type I) | Prospective cohort study |
Indianapolis, USA | Gender: 74% Male | ||||
Mechanism: N/A | |||||
ISS: N/A | |||||
Okello, 2007 | 403 admitted trauma patients | Mean Age: 29 yrs | Daily physical examination up to 30 days, including TTS in first 24 hours | Missed Injury – unclear definition – implied as injury detected after primary and secondary survey. (Type I) | Prospective cohort study |
Uganda | Gender: 82% Male | ||||
Mechanism: 91% Blunt | |||||
ISS: N/A | |||||
Janjua, 2008 | 206 admitted trauma patients | Mean Age: 35 yrs | TTS performed by trauma fellow within 24 hours and after regaining consciousness | Missed injury rate – Any injury missed on primary and secondary survey and operating room. (Type I) | Prospective cohort study |
Sydney, Australia | Gender: 75% Male | ||||
Mechanism: 91-100% Blunt | |||||
ISS: N/A | |||||
Ursic, 2009 | All admitted trauma patients. | Mean Age: 43.4 vs. 44.4 yrs Gender: 69.4% vs 68.9% Male Mechanism:94.3 vs. 94.4% Blunt ISS>15: 26% vs 31% | Implementation of a dedicated trauma service, which included a formalised TTS | Mortality and Length of Hospital stay. Missed injury – not in article -data retrieved via author communication - any injury missed at primary and secondary survey. (Type I) | Cohort study with before-and-after design |
Sydney, Australia | Before: 981 | ||||
After: 1,006 | |||||
Huynh, 2010 | 5,143 admitted trauma patients | Mean Age: 36.2 yrs | Mid level providers performed TTS using a form within 48 hours. This was reviewed by trauma surgeon | Missed injury – defined as detected at TTS. (Type I) | Prospective cohort study |
North Carolina, USA | Gender: 71% Male | ||||
Mechanism: 85% Blunt | |||||
Mean ISS: 14.2 |