Skip to content


Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine

Open Access

Use of antibiotics at the emergency department

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine201018(Suppl 1):P39

Published: 17 September 2010


PneumoniaEmergency DepartmentUrinary Tract InfectionBlood CultureInfected Patient


The question about rational use of antibiotics is always topical. The aim of the present research was to analyse the use of antibiotics in an emergency department (ED):

Which antibiotics are prescribed, how often and under which diagnoses? Are they appropriate and are they changed in the stationary unit? (All admitted patients are transferred to other units after initial treatment in the ED). Finally, which microbial cultures are performed before initiation of antibiotic treatment?


Retrospective analysis of 865 records on admitted patients and 1100 notes on ambulant patients from the ED at Køge Hospital, from October to December 2009. Doctors were not informed beforehand about the subsequent analysis.

To evaluate the choice of antibiotic we used the national recommendations ( If any doubt, we used the regional department of microbiology at Slagelse Hospital as reference.


Antibiotics were prescribed to 9% of admitted patients. Main diagnoses were pneumonia (39%), septicaemia/sepsis (20%) and urinary tract infections (UTI's) (14%). The most frequently used antibiotics were cefuroxim and benzylpenicillin intravenously (alone or in combination with other antibiotics).

3% of ambulant patients received antibiotics, mainly because of infected or potentially infected skin lesions (91%). Most received tablets of phenoxymethylpenicillin, and the doses varied considerably.

In 100% of skin infections, 90% of pneumonia cases, 75% of septicaemia/sepsis cases and 36% of UTI's the choice of antibiotics was in accordance with national recommendations.

Sputum culture was made in 7% of pneumonia cases, urine cultures in 60% of cases with UTI's. Blood cultures were generally performed with a high frequency.

48 hour follow up showed that in 81% of cases, treatment was not substantially changed in the stationary unit.


Focus on appropriate microbial cultures and correct choice and doses of antibiotics needs to be increased. Treatment of UTI's has to be reconsidered, as use of cefuroxim was high among these patients. Cefalosporins select ESBL-producing bacteria, and their use needs to be reduced to a minimum. Specific local guidelines for the management of infected patients are in progress, and after implementation of these we will perform a new analysis to assess the effect.

Authors’ Affiliations

Emergency Department, Copenhagen University Hospital in Køge, Denmark


© Damsgaard and Oestergaard licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010