Skip to main content

Table 3 Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for continuous variables

From: Excellent agreement of Norwegian trauma registry data compared to corresponding data in electronic patient records

Variable

Patients (n)

Number of missing registrations

Number of registrationsa

Observed agreement

ICCd (95% CI)

Mean diff.e

SDf

NTR

EPR

Observed agreement (%)b

Conc.(N); non-conc. (N)c

Prehospital data:

Pre-hospital SBP

150

14

5

136

86.8

118; 18

0.88 (0.83–0.91)

2.76

12.57

Pre-hospital RR

140

12

7

127

96.1

122; 5

0.99 (0.98–0.99)

0.02

0.94

Emergency admission data:

In-hospital SBP

172

4

2

168

91.7

154; 14

0.99 (0.98–0.99)

-0.11

3.44

In-hospital RR

169

5

4

163

96.3

157; 6

0.99 (0.99-1.00)

-0.10

0.66

Base excess

91

19

1

71

100.0

71; 0

1.00 (.,. )

0.00

0.00

Hospital stay data:

LOS ICU

180

0

0

180

90.0

162; 18

0.89 (0.85–0.91)

-0.11

0.52

Ventilator days

180

0

0

180

98.3

177; 3

0.98 (0.97–0.99)

0.01

0.13

Injury scoring data:

ISS

180

0

0

180

87.2

157; 23

0.96 (0.94–0.97)

0.07

2.13

NISS

180

0

0

180

86.1

155; 25

0.96 (0.94–0.97)

0.26

2.58

  1. Notes:
  2. aNumber of cases for registrations present in both NTR and EPRs;
  3. bObserved agreement calculated as number of concordant answers divided by n and multiplied by 100%;
  4. cConcordant answers – agreements over all paired answers for a given variable;
  5. dIntraclass correlation coefficient (two-way random effects model with absolute agreement);
  6. eMean difference calculated as EPRs minus NTR;
  7. fStandard deviation of the difference.
  8. Abbreviations: NTR, Norwegian Trauma Registry; EPR, Electronic Patient Record; Conc., concordant answers; non-conc., non-concordant answers; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation; SBP, Systolic Blood Pressure; RR, Respiratory Rate; LOS, Length of Stay; ICU, Intensive Care Unit; ISS, Injury Severity Score; NISS, New Injury Severity Score