Skip to main content

Table 3 Multivariable analysis of in-hospital mortality for all patients

From: Comparison between laparotomy first versus angiographic embolization first in patients with pelvic fracture and hemoperitoneum: a nationwide observational study from the Japan Trauma Data Bank

Variable

 

Model 1 †

Model 2 ‡

Adjusted OR

95% CI

Adjusted OR

95% CI

First procedure

    
 

Laparotomy

1.20

(0.61-2.39)

1.13

(0.63-2.01)

 

TAE

Reference

 

Reference

 

  Age

(years)

    
 

≤ 25

Reference

   
 

26-49

1.54

(0.61-3.90)

  
 

50-64

2.27

(0.86-6.02)

  
 

≥ 65

6.24

(2.40-16.2*)

  

  Gender

     
 

male

1.12

(0.59-2.11)

  
 

female

Reference

   

No. of comorbidities

    
 

0

Reference

   
 

1

1.00

(0.50-1.92)

  
 

≥ 2

2.01

(0.69-5.87)

  

  SBP

     
 

≤ 65

3.33

(1.51-7.32*)

  
 

66-89

1.59

(0.82-3.30)

  
 

≥ 90

Reference

   

  GCS score

     
 

< 9

4.97

(2.26-11.0*)

  
 

9-13

1.59

(0.78-3.25)

  
 

> 13

Reference

   

  ISS

     
 

< 26

Reference

   
 

26-35

1.72

(0.57-5.15)

  
 

36-45

1.04

(0.27-4.09)

  
 

> 45

1.24

(0.21-7.47)

  

  AIS

     
 

Pelvic AIS

1.54

(1.04-2.28*)

  
 

Head AIS

1.06

(0.85-1.33)

  
 

Thorax AIS

1.16

(0.91-1.47)

  
 

Abdomen AIS

1.36

(1.06-1.75*)

  
  1. AIS, abbreviated injury scale; CI, confidence intervals; GCS, Glasgow coma scale; ISS, injury severity score; OR, odds ratio; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TAE, transcatheter arterial embolization.
  2. * p values significant at (p < 0.05).
  3. † Model 1: multiple logistic regression analysis.
  4. ‡ Model 2: multiple logistic regression analysis including propensity scores; propensity scores were calculated based on age, gender, no. of comorbidities, SBP, GCS, ISS, and AIS (pelvic, head, thorax, abdomen).
Back to article page

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine

ISSN: 1757-7241