Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient demographics and baseline characteristics

From: Selection of CT variables and prognostic models for outcome prediction in patients with traumatic brain injury

Variable, n (%)

All patients (n = 158)

Age (y), mean (SD)

59 (43–69)

Sex, n (%)

 Female

47 (30)

 Male

111 (70)

PRE-ADMISSION

Trauma mechanism, n (%)

  Fall from height

87 (55)

  Traffic accident

35 (22)

  Assault

13 (8)

  Unclear (found unconscious)

23 (15)

  Extracranial injury

26 (16)

ADMISSION

Baseline data (%)

  GCS 3–8

60 (38)

  GCS 9–13

43 (27)

  GCS 14–15

55 (35)

Pupillary response (%)

  Bilateral response

116 (73)

  Unilateral response

22 (14)

  No response

20 (13)

  Hemoglobin (g/l), mean (SD)

138 (124–148)

  Glucose (millimoles/l), mean (SD)

8 (7–10)

Marshall CT classification (%)

  I

0 (0)

  II

33 (21)

  III

34 (22)

  IV

2 (1)

  V + VI

89 (56)

Rotterdam scoring system (%)

  1

4 (2)

  2

11 (7)

  3

41 (26)

  4

57 (36)

  5

33 (21)

  6

12 (8)

Stockholm CT score, median (IQR)

0,29 (0,16 – 0,40)

Helsinki CT score, median (IQR)

−0,04 (− 0,36 – 0,60)

Stay at the Neurointensive Care Unit (days), n (median)

8 (3–14)

FOLLOW-UP

GOS*, one year after trauma (%)

  1 (Death)

47 (30)

  2 (Vegetative state)

2 (1)

  3 (Severe disability)

39 (25)

  4 (Moderate disability)

43 (27)

  5 (Good recovery)

25 (16)

  Missing

2 (1)

  1–3 (Unfavorable outcome)

88 (56)

  4–5 (Favorable outcome)

68 (43)

  1. CT Computed tomography. GOS Glasgow Outcome Scale. The data is presented by number (percentage) or median (interquartile range)