Table 4 ROSC according to bystander CPR group
Author, year of publication | ROSC | Adjusted OR (CI) for ROSC at … | Proportion of OHCA calls where DA-CPR was provided% (m/M) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DA-CPR provided % (n/N) | Bystander CPR provided without DA% (n/N) | No bystander CPR% (n/N) | |||
Chang et al., 2018a [37] | 6.6% (49/747) | 9.9% (29/293) | 3.3% (32/980) | Â | 37.0% (747/2020) |
Harjanto et al., 2016c [39] | 26.9% (14/52) | 30.3% (233/769) | 27.2% (583/2147) | Â | 1.8% (52/2968) |
Hiltunen et al., 2015d [40] | 66.0% (35/53) | 61.2% (30/49) | 54.5% (18/33) | Â | 39.3% (53/135) |
Park et al., 2018a [44] | 7.4% (1433/19,343) | 8.9% (599/6753) | 3.8% (1030/27,144) | Â | 36.3% (19,343/53,240) |
Shibahashi et al., 2019b [45] | 9.2% (8017/86,913) | 13.6% (6392/46,964) | 8.1% (36,423/448,606) | No BCPR: referencef BCPR: 1.76 (1.71–1.81) DA-CPR: 1.34 (1.31–1.38) | 14.9% (86,913/582,483) |
Viereck et al., 2017b [46] | 33.8% (118/357) | 41.2% (77/191) |  | DA-CPR: referenceg BCPR: 0.88 (0.56–1.38) | 65.1% (357/548) |
Wu et al., 2018d [47] | 16.0% (154/964) | 20.9% (112/535) | 15.1% (111/737) | Â | 43.4% (1002/2310)e |