Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the personnel and volunteers stratified by the stabilisation method performed

From: Vacuum mattress or long spine board: which method of spinal stabilisation in trauma patients is more time consuming? A simulation study

Parameter

Stabilisation method

p-value

Long Spine Board

(n=94)

Vacuum mattress

(n=78)

Conditions n (%)

 Ideal

60 (63.83 %)

51 (65.38 %)

0.83

 Realistic

34 (36.17 %)

27 (34.62 %)

Personnel

Qualification n (%)

 Emergency physician

11 (11.70 %)

10 (12.82 %)

0.99

 Medical student

28 (29.79 %)

24 (30.77 %)

 Paramedic in training

20 (21.28 %)

16 (20.51 %)

 Paramedic

4 (4.26 %)

4 (5.13 %)

 Firefighter

31 (32.98 %)

24 (30.77 %)

Participants n (%)

Sex

 Male

60 (65 %)

51 (65 %)

0.70

 Female

23 (25 %)

17 (22 %)

BMI

25.1 (95% CI 24.5 – 25.6)

24.1 (95% CI 23.5 – 24.7)

0.02

  1. The descriptive characteristics are expressed as absolute (relative) frequencies or means with 95% confidence interval in brackets
  2. n numbers; BMI body mass index; CI confidence interval
  3. Note: the number of stabilisation procedures does not match the number of participants since some participants volunteered more than once