Skip to main content

Table 2 AUROC value for discrimination ability for in-hospital mortality of each variable

From: Prognostic ability of the sequential organ failure assessment score in accidental hypothermia: a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study

 

Between-Group Difference

Variables

AUROC

95% CI

SOFA vs variable

95% CI

P value

Age

0.56

[0.46–0.64]

0.24

[0.11–0.37]

<.001

Body Temperature

0.53

[0.44–0.62]

0.27

[0.15–0.39]

<.001

Laboratory results

 Potassium

0.65

[0.55–0.73]

0.15

[0.04–0.26]

<.001

 Lactate

0.66

[0.57–0.75]

0.13

[0.02–0.25]

0.02

Illness severity

 SOFA

0.80

[0.72–0.86]

   

 qSOFA

0.55

[0.46–0.64]

0.25

[0.15–0.34]

<.001

 SIRS

0.60

[0.50–0.69]

0.20

[0.09–0.32]

<.001

 5A severity scale

0.77

[0.68 0.84]

0.03

[−0.07–0.13]

0.54

  1. AUROC Area under the receiver operationg characteristic curve, CI Confidence interval, qSOFA quick SOFA, SOFA Sequential organ failure assessment, SIRS Systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria