Skip to main content

Table 1 Detailed information on the basic characteristics of the 13 included studies and participants

From: Meta-analysis of plate fixation versus intramedullary fixation for the treatment of mid-shaft clavicle fractures

Author

Country (area)

Publication year

RCT or Not

IF (case)

PF (case)

IF age (mean)

PF age (mean)

IF (M/F)

PF (M/F)

Follow-up (months)

Narsaria [10]

India

2014

RCT

33

32

38.9 ± 9.1 (20–62)

40.2 ± 11.2 (18–64)

24/9

26/6

>24

Liu [12]

China,Taiwan

2010

Not

51

59

33.6 ± 13.5

31.7 ± 9.7

32/19

29/30

>12

Fu [14]

China,Taiwan

2012

Not

53

50

35.2 ± 14.5

39.9 ± 14.8

38/15

33/17

>12

Ko [38]

Korea

1999

Not

13

18

36.6 (23–68)

43.3 (18–74

NP

NP

>12

Lee J [17]

USA

2014

Not

43

67

27.6 (14–59)

31.7 (16–68)

29/5

63/4

>15

Wenninger [30]

USA

2013

Not

33

29

25.2 (18–51)

26.9 (20–49)

32/1

26/3

>12

Assobhi [36]

Egypt

2011

RCT

19

19

30.3 ± 4.8 (24–45)

32.6 ± 5.9 (26–49)

16/3

17/2

>12

Wijdicks [31]

The Netherlands

2012

Not

47

43

33.1 ± 15.6

39.4 ± 14.1

33/14

33/10

>12

Ferran [40]

UK

2010

RCT

17

15

23.8 (13–42)

35.4 (16–53)

14/3

13/2

12.4

(Mean)

          

Kleweno [41]

USA

2011

Not

18

14

35 (16–56)

28 (16–46)

15/3

10/4

>12

Chen [21]

China

2012

Not

57

84

34.3 (20–59)

36.5 (19–63)

41/16

61/23

>24

Lee Y [24]

China,Taiwan

2008

RCT

56

32

40.1

38.2

37/19

20/12

>12

Thyagarajan [37]

UK

2009

Not

17

17

28 (15–56)

32.1 (17–46)

16/1

15/2

5.9

  1. Abbreviation: RCT randomized controlled trials, PF plate fixation, IF intramedullary fixation, M males, F females.