Skip to main content

Table 5 Triage outcome split by factors associated with undertriage among 2221 severely injured patients. Unadjusted and adjusted (for gender, age, category of prehospital care, ED-RTS and fall), estimates of odds ratio for undertriage with 95% CI and p values

From: Precision of field triage in patients brought to a trauma centre after introducing trauma team activation guidelines

 

Correct triage (n = 2 002)

Undertriage (n = 219)

OR (95% CI)

Adjusted OR (95% CI)

Gender:

    

   Men

1 525 (76%)

137 (63%)

1.00

1.00

   Women

477 (24%)

82 (37%)

1.91 (1.43 – 2.56)*

1.25 (0.89 – 1.77)†

Age:

    

   <55 years

1 595 (80%)

99 (45%)

1.00

1.00

   55–70 years

261 (13%)

46 (21%)

2.84 (1.96 – 4.13)*

2.19 (1.45 – 3,31)*

   >70 years

146 (7%)

74 (34%)

8.17 (5.78 – 11.54)*

5.41 (3.60 – 8.13)*

Admitted by:

    

   Anaesthetist

1 034 (52%)

25 (11%)

1.00

1.00

   Paramedic

968 (48%)

194 (89%)

8.29 (5.42 – 12.69)*

5.84 (3.73 – 9.13)*

ED-RTS:

    

   12

1 035 (52%)

156 (71%)

1.00

1.00

   <12

967 (48%)

63 (29%)

0.43 (0.32 – 0.59)*

0.42 (0.30 – 0.60)*

Fall:

    

   No

1 632 (82%)

81 (37%)

1.00

1.00

   Yes

370 (18%)

138 (63%)

7.52 (5.59 – 10.11)*

4.89 (3.51 – 6.83)*

  1. CI: Confidence Interval; OR: Odds Ratio; *: p < 0.001; †: p = 0.202;
  2. ED-RTS: Revised Trauma Score in the Emergency Department