Open Access

Lessons from a large trauma center: impact of blunt chest trauma in polytrauma patients—still a relevant problem?

  • Konstantina Chrysou1,
  • Gabriel Halat1,
  • Beatrix Hoksch1,
  • Ralph A. Schmid1 and
  • Gregor J. Kocher1Email author
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine201725:42

DOI: 10.1186/s13049-017-0384-y

Received: 20 November 2016

Accepted: 3 April 2017

Published: 20 April 2017

Abstract

Background

Thoracic trauma is the third most common cause of death after abdominal injury and head trauma in polytrauma patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate epidemiological data, treatment and outcome of polytrauma patients with blunt chest trauma in order to help improve management, prevent complications and decrease polytrauma patients’ mortality.

Methods

In this retrospective study we included all polytrauma patients with blunt chest trauma admitted to our tertiary care center emergency department for a 2-year period, from June 2012 until May 2014. Data collection included details of treatment and outcome. Patients with chest trauma and Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥18 and Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) >2 in more than one body region were included.

Results

A total of 110 polytrauma patients with blunt chest injury were evaluated. 82 of them were males and median age was 48.5 years. Car accidents, falls from a height and motorbike accidents were the most common causes (>75%) for blunt chest trauma. Rib fractures, pneumothorax and pulmonary contusion were the most common chest injuries. Most patients (64.5%) sustained a serious chest injury (AISthorax 3), 19.1% a severe chest injury (AISthorax 4) and 15.5% a moderate chest injury (AISthorax 2). 90% of patients with blunt chest trauma were treated conservatively. Chest tube insertion was indicated in 54.5% of patients. The need for chest tube was significantly higher among the AISthorax 4 group in comparison to the AIS groups 3 and 2 (p < 0.001). Also, admission to the ICU was directly related to the severity of the AISthorax (p < 0.001). The severity of chest trauma did not correlate with ICU length of stay, intubation days, complications or mortality.

Conclusion

Although 84.5% of patients suffered from serious or even severe chest injury, neither in the conservative nor in the surgically treated group a significant impact of injury severity on ICU stay, intubation days, complications or mortality was observed. AISthorax was only related to the rate of chest tube insertions and ICU admission. Management with early chest tube insertion when necessary, pain control and chest physiotherapy resulted in good outcome in the majority of patients.

Background

Despite global efforts to reduce human accidents, even today, the number of polytrauma patients admitted to hospitals remains high with around 5.8 million deaths worldwide attributed to traumatic injuries every year [1, 2]. The differences in the severity and complexity of these injuries constitute a challenging issue for clinicians around the world and therefore advanced health care methods are needed in order to reduce morbidity and mortality rates.

Thoracic trauma constitutes the third most common cause of death after abdominal injury and head trauma in polytrauma patients [3]. However different studies conducted on patients with chest injuries have indicated significant differences in their morbidity and mortality and therefore, further research is essential in order to improve medical care [4, 5].

The purpose of this study was to investigate the epidemiology, characteristics, incidence and management of polytrauma patients with chest injury admitted to our tertiary care facilities’ level I trauma center in order to indicate factors influencing management, possible complications and patient mortality.

Methods

We performed a retrospective data collection of all polytrauma patients with an ISS ≥ 18 and AIS ≥ 2 in more than one injured body region admitted to the emergency department of our tertiary care center from June 2012 until May 2014. Inclusion criteria were an age above 16 years old, as well as a blunt chest trauma with an AISthorax ≥ 2. Patients with penetrating chest trauma were excluded from this study. The study was performed after permission was granted by the local ethics committee (#23-12-13(3)).

Detailed information including patient charts were extracted from the hospitals electronic database. Data collection included demographic details, mechanism of injury, details of injuries with scoring based on the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS).

Management of patients, surgical procedures, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, hospital length of stay, as well as injury related complications of these patients were recorded. Factors affecting mortality were evaluated. Because different mechanism of injury were observed among different age intervals, we compared our findings between two age groups of patients: 16–50 years and over 50 years old in order to investigate differences in the treatment and outcome between younger and elderly patients.

Statistical analysis

Quantitative data is presented as median and range. Statistical analysis was performed using independent samples t-test implemented in the SPSS software package v20.

Results

A total of 110 patients (82 males) with chest injuries were included in our study. Male to female ratio was 2.79 to 1.00. Median age was 48.5 years (range 17–93 years). Road accidents (car, motorbike and bike accidents) were the most common cause for severe chest injury, followed by fall from a height (25.4%), snow sports accidents (9.2%) and miscellaneous causes (Table 1).
Table 1

Mechanism of injury

Mechanism of injury

No. of patients

Percent

Car accidents

32

29.1

Falls

28

25.5

Motorbike accidents

23

20.9

Snow sports

9

8.2

Paragliding

4

3.6

Hot air balloon

3

2.7

Workplace accidents

3

2.7

Climbing

2

1.8

Horse riding

2

1.8

Bike accidents

2

1.8

Skateboard

1

0.9

Base jumping

1

0.9

Injury pattern

Rib fractures comprised the largest group of thoracic injuries in our series (86.4%) with nearly 75% of them involving three or more ribs. There was a 22.7% incidence of bilateral rib fractures, while in 7 cases flail chest was present (Table 2). The diagnosis of flail chest was made in case of clinical chest wall instability and radiographic confirmation of the diagnosis on chest CT scan (fracture of three or more adjacent ribs in at least two places). The most common associated thoracic injuries were pneumothorax, hemothorax and pulmonary contusion.
Table 2

Chest injuries

Chest injuries

No

Percent

Rib Fracture

95

86.4%

  > 3 Ribs

68

61.8%

 bilateral

25

22.7%

 flail chest

7

6.4%

Pneumothorax

65

59.1%

Pulmonary contusion

55

50.0%

Hemothorax

24

21.8%

Clavicle

20

18.9%

Sternal fracture

17

15.5%

Scapula

14

12.7%

Cardiac contusions

11

10.0%

Ruptured diaphragms

2

1.8%

Ruptured aortas

1

0.9%

Tracheobronchial Injury

1

0.9%

As indicated in Table 2, the incidence of pneumothorax was 59.1%, while the incidence of hemothorax was 21.8%. Pulmonary contusions were observed in 55 (50%) patients.

The associated injuries of our study population included spine injuries in 59 patients (53.6%), extremity fractures in 84 patients (76.4%) and head trauma in 41 patients (37.3%). The miscellaneous category included pelvic fractures, intra-abdominal injuries and facial trauma as shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Distribution of Injuries according to body region

Management

Regarding management, 99 of our thoracic patients with chest trauma were treated conservatively (90%). A chest tube insertion to relieve pneumothorax and/or hemothorax was indicated in 60 of them (54.5%). However observation was possible for patients suffering from small pneumothorax (≤2 cm), without underlying respiratory disease or the need for positive pressure ventilation. 45/60 patients (75%) were treated with chest tube thoracostomy in the emergency department. Median duration of chest tube treatment was 7.5 days (range 1–18 days) depending on the amount of fluid in the drainage chamber, evidence of air leak, and/or expected further surgical operations needing positive pressure ventilation.

Thoracic surgical procedures were performed in 11 cases (10%), including 7 rib stabilizations (6.4%) in patients with a ventilator-dependent flail chest as well as 4 hemothorax evacuations (3.6%) in patients with retained hemothorax not drainable by the indwelling chest tube. Patients requiring thoracic surgery were operated on average 4.5 days after admission. On the contrary, 50 out of a total of 80 (62.5%) non-thoracic surgical operations (orthopedic, neurosurgical, abdominal) had to be carried out within 48h after admission.

Length of intensive care, mechanical ventilation, and hospital stay

The median hospital length of stay of polytrauma patients with chest injuries was 11 days (range 1–55 days). Seventy-five patients (68.2%) required ICU treatment with a median ICU length of stay of 3 days (range 1–55 days). Intubated patients were referred to the ICU directly, whereas all other patients were transferred to an intermediate care unit (section of the ICU) for further surveillance. Intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation was necessary in 32 patients. The median duration on the ventilator was 5 days (range 1–55 days).

Forty-nine patients (44.5%) were discharged home; all other patients, apart from 6 deaths, were transferred either to other hospitals or to rehabilitation units for further treatment.

Complications and Mortality

The most common complication was pneumonia (14/110 patients, 12.7%). Sepsis was observed in 6 patients (5.5%), and multi-organ failure in 3 patients (2.7%). Overall 30-day mortality was 5.5% (6/110 patients). All deaths occurred in the context of head trauma or multi-organ failure as a result of hemorrhagic shock. There was no death among the 11 patients who underwent thoracic surgery, nor was there any death directly related to chest injuries

Abbreviated Injury Severity Score (AIS)

Chest injuries were classified into 4 groups according to the AIS. In our series, 17 patients (15%) sustained a moderate chest injury (AISthorax = 2), 71 patients (64.5%) a serious chest injury (AISthorax = 3), while a severe thoracic trauma (AISthorax = 4) was recorded in 21 patients (19.1%). There was only 1 patient with critical chest trauma (AISthorax = 5). There were no patients with AISthorax score of 1 or 6.

The distribution of patients in groups according to the AIS and the results of the statistical analysis between the groups with AISthorax 2, 3 and 4 are shown in Table 3.
Table 3

AIS and clinical characteristics

AISthorax

AIS 2

AIS 3

AIS 4

AIS 5

p-value

N (%)

17 (15.5)

71 (64.5)

21 (19.1)

1 (0.9)

 

Hospitalization days

(median, range)

12 (6–33)

11 (2–55)

11 (4–36)

1

p 0.593

ICU patients n (%)

8 (10.5)

49 (64.5)

18 (85.7)

1 (100)

p < 0.001

ICU stay (days)

(median, range)

3 (1–20)

3 (1–55)

3.5 (1–24)

1

p 0.34

Intubation days

(median, range)

5 (1–6)

5 (1–55)

6 (1–18)

1

p 0.62

Chest tube n (%)

3 (17.6)

37 (52.1)

19 (90.5)

1 (100)

p < 0.001

Days chest tube

(median, range)

3 (2–4)

7 (2–16)

9 (2–18)

1

p 0.125

Thoracic Surgery

0

6

5

0

 

Pneumonia n

2

11

1

0

 

Sepsis n

0

3

1

0

 

Multi Organ failure

0

4

1

0

 

Death n

0

5

0

1

 

Significant p values are listed in bold

The percentage of patients admitted to the ICU was associated with the severity of the AISthorax (p < 0.001; AISthorax 2: 10.5% vs. AISthorax 3: 64.5% vs. AISthorax 4: 85.7%). Similarly the percentage of patients requiring a chest tube insertion was statistically significantly higher (p < 0.001) among the AISthorax 4 group (90.5%) in comparison with the AIS groups 2 and 3 (17.6% and 52.1% respectively) as expected.

Interestingly the severity of chest trauma did correlate neither with ICU and intubation days nor with the rate of complications and mortality.

Injury Severity Score (ISS)

The degree of total severity of injury was categorized using the ISS [69]. A very severe injury (ISS > 25) was observed in 46 patients (41.9%). According to the calculated ISS, patients were stratified into two groups (ISS: 18–24 and >24)

There was a significant association between the mortality rate and the ISS, as all 6 deaths were in the ISS > 24 group. The median hospitalization time was also significantly longer for this group in comparison to patients with an ISS < 24 (14 days vs. 9 days respectively, p  < 0.05).

However, no difference was detected regarding ICU length of stay and ventilator days.

Comparison between age groups <50 years and >50 years old

In order to investigate the impact of age in management and outcome, patients were divided into two age groups: <50 years and >50 years and the two age groups were compared. Among the older population, rib fractures were more common (p < 0.05) and hospital stay was longer (p < 0.05). In addition, the elderly underwent surgery significantly earlier (p < 0.01) compared to younger patients. Liver injuries as well as injuries of upper extremities were more common in patients younger than 50 years (p < 0.05) related to the higher number of motor vehicle accidents observed in this age group.

Discussion

Although the majority of our patients with blunt chest injury could be treated without surgery (90%), more than half of them required chest tube thoracostomy (54.5%). In our study 75% of the chest tubes were placed in the emergency department, because of the severity of the patients’ general condition, especially in case of tension pneumothorax, traumatic symptomatic pneumothorax and hemothorax, respectively.

As Lesquen et al. [10] mentioned in their review, all traumatic pneumothoraces and symptomatic traumatic hemothoraces should be considered for chest tube insertion in the first 48 h following blunt chest trauma. However, observation is possible for selected patients without respiratory disease or the need for positive pressure ventilation presenting with small unilateral pneumothoraces [11]. Late drainage is usually required in patients with progression of pneumothoraces, hemothoraces or respiratory distress [12, 13].

In accordance with other studies only 10% of our polytrauma patients required surgical treatment for their chest injuries due to unsuccessful non-operative treatment such as non-resolving pneumothorax despite thoracic drainage and/or observation of a persisting air leak in the underwater seal. Condition of a bilateral flail chest with paradoxical movement and/or the need for positive pressure ventilation for more than 48 h was considered an indication for surgery as well [14, 1517]. This may explain the fact that patients requiring thoracic surgery were operated on average 4.5 days after admission due to our efforts for conservative treatment for patients with stable respiratory function at presentation in the emergency room.

In our patient cohort, 6.4% of the individuals underwent surgical chest wall stabilization. Benefits of a timely chest wall stabilization have been reported in the literature [18]. The severity of chest trauma, based on the AIS, did not correlate with the hospital and ICU length of stay, the time of mechanical ventilation, complications and mortality rates. We explain this finding by the fact that in patients with an AISthorax of 2 and especially 3 associated injuries such as head and abdominal injuries were much more common than in the group with an AISthorax of 4. The latter group mainly suffered from the sequelae of an isolated but more severe chest trauma, which is also reflected by a nearly three times higher rate of thoracic surgery compared to patients with an AISthorax of 3 (23.4% vs. 8.5%). Our data are in line with the findings of Veysi et al. with the exception that mortality was in contrast with our study positively related to AISthorax [19]. We may assume that an early simple tube thoracostomy in the first 48 h in case of severe pneumothorax, an aggressive pain control including epidural analgesia when necessary (i.e. insufficient pain control with opioids), and intensive chest physiotherapy are the most important factors influencing the outcome after blunt chest trauma [15, 17, 19].

The overall mortality in our cohort reached 5.5%, and was thus significantly lower as compared to previously reported studies [4, 19, 20]. This was maybe owed to the well-developed network of pre-hospital trauma management and the relatively short pre-hospital distances in our country as well as to the hospitals structure of multi-specialist integrated groups and the improved intensive care resuscitation which may result in a survival benefit for trauma patients. Interestingly none of the deaths in our study was attributed to the chest trauma itself. Rather it seems that the severity of an associated head injury significantly correlates with the mortality rate [7, 19, 20], showing the importance of immediate neurosurgical treatment if possible, in order to reduce mortality in polytrauma patients. On the other hand it must also be taken into consideration that that a significant proportion of deaths attributed to critical chest trauma occur in the prehospital setting, although the exact number is difficult to be calculated [21].

Among the elderly population in our study, rib fractures were more common, average hospital stay was longer, and surgery was performed significantly earlier in comparison to the age group < 50. In the elderly the force required to cause rib fractures is less compared to young patients because of osteoporosis, loss of muscle mass, and possible comorbidities [8, 2224]. Studies have shown that the likelihood of death in case of flail chest increases 132% with every 10 year-increase in age [23]. Furthermore the elderly are more susceptible to pulmonary deterioration and are often affected by other complications such as pneumonia [15]. Therefore early surgical management in this age group may prevent further complications and decrease mortality [18]. In our study the elderly underwent surgery significantly earlier for the reasons described above. Regarding younger patients, fractures of upper extremities are typically more frequent as a result of high-energy trauma, such as motor vehicle accidents.

Conclusion

Mortality rates in polytrauma patients with blunt chest trauma did not correlate with the severity of chest injury but rather with the severity of associated head injuries in our study cohort. Prompt management of blunt chest trauma with timely chest tube thoracostomy whenever necessary, optimal pain control and chest physiotherapy resulted in good outcome in the majority of patients. Surgical treatment for chest wall stabilization or hemothorax evacuation was only required in a small percentage of polytrauma patients with blunt chest trauma.

Abbreviations

AIS: 

Abbreviated injury scale

ISS: 

Injury severity score

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors’ contributions

KC analyzed and interpreted the patient data and drafted the manuscript. GH contributed to acquisition of data. BH made substantial contributions to conception and design. RAS Head of the Department/supervisor. GJK contributed to writing and revision of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Local ethics committee (#23-12-13(3)).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern

References

  1. Krug EG, Sharma GK, Lozano R. The global burden of injuries. Am J Public Health. 2000;90:523–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. The Science Base for Prevention of Injury and Violence. CDC Web site. Available athttps://www.cdc.gov/cdcgrandrounds/archives/2012/january2012.htm. Accessed 10 Dec 2016.
  3. Lecky FE, Bouamra O, Woodford M, Alexandrescu R and O'Brien SJ. Epidemiology of Polytrauma. In: Hans-Christoph Pape, Andrew B. Peitzman, C. William Schwab, Peter V. Giannoudis, editors. Damage Control Management in the Polytrauma Patient. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 13-24.Google Scholar
  4. Hildebrand F, Giannoudis PV, Griensven M, Zelle B, Ulmer B, Krettek C, et al. Management of polytraumatized patients with associated blunt chest trauma: a comparison of two European countries. Injury. 2005;36:293–302.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. LoCicero III J, Mattox KL. Epidemiology of chest trauma. Surg Clin North Am. 1989;69:15–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker SP, O’Neill B, Haddon Jr W, Long WB. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma. 1974;14(3):187–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Osler T, Baker SP, Long W. A modification of the injury severity score that both improves accuracy and simplifies scoring. J Trauma. 1997;43(6):922–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Osler T, Rutledge R, Deis J, Bedrick E. ICISS: an international classification of disease-9 based injury severity score. J Trauma. 1996;41(3):380–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Linn S. The injury severity score--importance and uses. Ann Epidemiol. 1995;5(6):440–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. de Lesquen H, Avaro JP, Gust L, Ford RM, Beranger F, Natale C, et al. Surgical management for the first 48 h following blunt chest trauma: state of the art (excluding vascular injuries). Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015;20(3):399–408.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Moore FO, Goslar PW, Coimbra R, Velmahos G, Brown CV, Coopwood Jr TB, et al. Blunt traumatic occult pneumothorax: is observation safe?--results of a prospective, AAST multicenter study. J Trauma. 2011;70(5):1019–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Wanek S, Mayberry JC. Blunt thoracic trauma: flail chest, pulmonary contusion and blast injury. Crit Care Clin. 2004;20(1):71–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Velmahos GC, Vassiliu P, Chan LS, Murray JA, Berne TV, Demetriades D. Influence of flail chest on outcome among patients with severe thoracic cage trauma. Int Surg. 2002;87(4):240–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Stahel PF, Schneider P, Buhr HJ, Kruschewski M. Emergency management of thoracic trauma. Orthopade. 2005;34(9):865–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Pape HC, Remmers D, Rice J, Ebisch M, Krettek C, Tscherne H. Appraisal of early evaluation of blunt chest trauma: development of a standardized scoring system for initial clinical decision making. J Trauma. 2000;49:496–504.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson G. Traumatic pneumothorax: is a chest drain always necessary? J Accid Emerg Med. 1996;13(3):173–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Marasco SF, Davies AR, Cooper J, Varma D, Bennett V, Nevill R, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial of operative rib fixation in traumatic flail chest. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(5):924–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kocher GJ, Sharafi S, Azenha LF, Schmid RA. Chest wall stabilization in ventilator-dependent traumatic flail chest patients: Who benefits? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016.Google Scholar
  19. Veysi VT, Nikolaou VS, Paliobeis C, Efstathopoulos N, Giannoudis PV. Prevalence of chest trauma, associated injuries and mortality: a level I trauma centre experience. Int Orthop. 2009;33(5):1425–33.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Gennarelli TA, Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Copes WS, Alves WM. Mortality of patients with head injury and extracranial injury treated in trauma centers. J Trauma. 1989;29(9):1193–202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Unsworth A, Curtis K, Asha SE. Treatments for blunt chest trauma and their impact on patient outcomes and health service delivery. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015;23:17.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Kilgo PD, Osler TM, Meredith W. The worst injury predicts mortality outcome the best: rethinking the role of multiple injuries in trauma outcome scoring. J Trauma. 2003;55(4):599–607.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Albaugh G, Kann B, Puc MM, Vemulapalli P, Marra S, Ross S. Age-adjusted outcomes in traumatic flail chest injuries in the elderly. Am Surg. 2000;66(10):978–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Bergeron E, Lavoie A, Clas D, Moore L, Ratte S, Tetreault S, et al. Elderly trauma patients with rib fractures are at greater risk of death and pneumonia. J Trauma. 2003;54:478–85.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement