Open Access

Comparisons of normal saline and lactated Ringer’s resuscitation on hemodynamics, metabolic responses, and coagulation in pigs after severe hemorrhagic shock

  • Wenjun Z Martini1Email author,
  • Douglas S Cortez1 and
  • Michael A Dubick1
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine201321:86

DOI: 10.1186/1757-7241-21-86

Received: 22 August 2013

Accepted: 5 December 2013

Published: 11 December 2013

Abstract

Background

Ongoing improvements in trauma care now recommend earlier use of blood products as part of damage control resuscitation, but generally these products are not available at far forward battlefield locations. For the military, questions continue to arise regarding efficacy of normal saline (NS) vs. lactated Ringer’s (LR). Thus, this study compared the effects of LR and NS after severe hemorrhage in pigs.

Methods

20 anesthetized pigs were randomized into control (n = 6), LR (n = 7), and NS (n = 7) groups. Hemorrhage of 60% estimated total blood volume was induced in LR and NS groups by removing blood from the left femoral artery using a computer-controlled pump. Afterwards, the pigs were resuscitated with either LR at 3 times the bled volume or the volume of NS to reach the same mean arterial pressure (MAP) as in LR group. Hemodynamics were measured hourly and blood samples were taken at baseline (BL), 15 min, 3 h and 6 h after resuscitation to measure changes in coagulation using thrombelastograph®.

Results

MAP was decreased by hemorrhage but returned to BL within 1 h after resuscitation with LR (119 ± 7 ml/kg) or NS (183 ± 9 ml/kg, p < 0.05). Base excess (BE) was decreased by hemorrhage; resuscitation with LR recovered BE but not with NS. Total peripheral resistance was decreased with NS and LR, with a larger drop shown in NS. Serum potassium was increased with NS, but not affected with LR. Coagulation changes were similar between LR and NS.

Conclusions

NS may be inferior to LR in resuscitation due to its vasodilator effects and the risks of metabolic acidosis and hyperkalemia.

Keywords

Hemorrhagic shock Oxygen metabolism Coagulation Pre-hospital resuscitation and Thromboelastrograph®

Background

Normal saline (NS) and lactated Ringer’s (LR) solution have been used as crystalloid fluids for decades[1, 2], but controversies continue as to which crystalloid is best. Although damage control resuscitation was introduced recently to initiate early use of blood products for severely injured hypotensive trauma patients[36], blood products are not generally available at pre-hospital and far forward military settings. Crystalloids remain to be used as resuscitation fluids under these conditions with survival benefit[7]. NS contains 154 mM Na+ and Cl-, with an average pH of 5.0 and osmolarity of 308 mOsm/L. LR solution has an average pH of 6.5, is hypo-osmolar (272 mOsm/L), and has similar electrolytes (130 mM Na+, 109 mM Cl-, 28 mM lactate, etc.) to plasma; thus, it was considered a more physiologically compatible fluid than NS. Since its initial use in 1831 for treating cholera[8, 9], NS has been recommended as therapeutic intravenous (IV) fluid in various clinical situations, such as kidney transplantation, blood storage, and blood transfusion[10, 11], although development of hyperchloremic acidosis is commonly observed[1214]. LR’s acid base balance is superior to that of NS’s[15, 16], but it has not been approved by the Association of American Blood Bank for use with blood products in the same iv-line[11]. Thus, it is necessary and clinically relevant to comprehensively and systemically examine the resuscitative effects of these two crystalloids.

Limited experimental evidence has contributed to the difficulty over the selection of resuscitation fluids. LR’s better acid base balance and survival has been shown in a rat model with massive hemorrhage[17] and an unanesthetized swine model with rapid hemorrhage[18], suggesting the superiority of LR under severe trauma setting. In pigs with uncontrolled hemorrhage, Kiraly et al. showed that LR resuscitation was associated with hypercoagulability and less blood loss over a 2-hour post-injury period[19]. It is unclear whether the hypercoagulability is transient or is likely to be a concern. On the other hand, a recent multicenter survey of prehospital intervention at a combat zone showed that IV fluids administered in the field favored the use of NS by 73% to 17% LR[20], even though Hextend® (manufactured by BioTime, California, USA, with 6% hetastarch, a mean molecular weight of 670 kD and a degree of hydroxyethyl group substitution of 0.75 (HES 670/0.75)) is the fluid recommended by the Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care[21]. In addition, the Israeli Defense Force has recently recommended LR as initial resuscitation of their combat casualties[22]. Thus, the greater use of NS by medics than the recommendation for Hextend®[20, 21], recommendation for pre-hospital LR by the Israeli Defense Force[22], and the inquiry from the US Army’s Combat Developer’s office regarding NS vs. LR for pre-hospital resuscitation, all together prompted this current study. In order to assess more comprehensively the physiological and biochemical effects of LR and NS, we compared the resuscitative effects of LR and NS on hemodynamics, oxygen metabolism, and coagulation in a swine model with severe hemorrhagic shock over a 6 h post resuscitation period; the time period in which most trauma patients die from hemorrhage[23].

Methods

Experimental design

This animal study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the US Army Institute of Surgical Research and was conducted in compliance with the Animal Welfare Act and the implementing Animal Welfare Regulations and in accordance with the principles of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. A total of 20 pigs (34.6 ± 1.2 kg) were randomly allocated into three experimental groups: sham control (n = 6), hemorrhage with LR resuscitation group (LR, n = 7), and hemorrhage with NS resuscitation group (NS, n = 7). After an overnight fast, the animals were pre-anesthetized with Glycopyrrolate (Glycopyrronium bromide, 0.1 mg/kg, America Regent, Shirley, NY, USA) and Telazol® (Tiletamine HCl and Zolazepam HCl, 6 mg/kg, Pfizer, NY, NY, USA). Anesthesia was induced via a facemask with approximately 5% Isoflurane (Forane, Baxer, Deerfield, IL, USA) in 100% Oxygen. The pigs were then intubated with a cuffed endotracheal tube (7.5 mm, Rusch, Teleflex Medical, Research Triangle Park, NC). During surgical instrumentation, anesthesia was maintained with 1% to 3% isoflurane in 30% oxygen in air using a ventilator and monitor (Fabius gas anesthesia system and Infinity Explorer monitoring system, Draeger Medical, Telford, PA). Tidal volume was set at 7 ml/kg with a rate of 25 breaths/minute. Ventilation was adjusted to reach an end tidal pCO2 of approximately 40 mmHg at baseline. Afterwards, no adjustments in ventilation setting were made throughout the experiment. Polyvinyl chloride catheters were inserted into the thoracic aorta via the carotid artery to measure mean arterial pressure (MAP), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate. A Swan-Ganz thermodilution catheter was inserted in the pulmonary artery via the left jugular vein to measure cardiac output and temperature. The right femoral artery was cannulated for arterial blood sampling and induction of bleeding. The right jugular vein was cannulated for venous blood sampling. The left femoral vein was cannulated for resuscitation. The right femoral vein was cannulated for IV anesthesia during the study. No splenectomy was performed in this study.

Upon completion of surgical procedures, anesthesia was switched to a combination of isoflurane (0.5%) and continuous IV drip of Ketacine® (Ketamine HCl, 0.25 mg/(kg*min), Putney, Boise, ID, USA) in all pigs throughout the entire study period. After a 10-min stabilization period, blood samples were taken from the femoral artery and the right jugular vein for baseline measurements. The urine bag was emptied before urine output measurement started at baseline. Hemorrhage was then induced by bleeding from the femoral artery into sterile empty blood bags containing standard anticoagulant citrate phosphate dextrose solution. The pigs were hemorrhaged 60% of their estimated total blood volume exponentially over 60 min using a computer-controlled pump as described in our laboratory[24]. Upon the completion of hemorrhage, pigs were randomly assigned to LR or NS group. In the LR group, pigs were resuscitated with LR at 3 times the bled volume given over a 45-min period. In the NS group, resuscitation with NS was given to reach the same MAP as achieved after resuscitation in the LR group. Therefore, an NS resuscitated pig was done after a LR resuscitated pig. The LR of 3 times the bled volume was used since this ratio was conventionally recommended as initial fluid resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock for prehospital trauma life support[25]. Pigs in the sham control group were not hemorrhaged or resuscitated. Pigs in all three groups were given the same amount of anesthesia and maintenance fluid (0.04 ml/kg/min) and no significant changes in hemodynamics and coagulation were observed in the sham control pigs during the entire study period, suggesting the stability of the anesthesia regimen. The entire study was depicted in Figure 1. No heparin was used in this study.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1757-7241-21-86/MediaObjects/13049_2013_Article_716_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Experimental protocol.

All pigs were observed for 6 h after the completion of resuscitation. Blood samples were taken at baseline, after hemorrhage, 15 min, 3 h, and 6 h after resuscitation for measurements of blood gas, blood chemistry, and coagulation (Figure 1). At the end of 6 h, surviving animals were euthanized with Fatal-Plus® (sodium pentobarbital, 100 mg/kg, Vortech, Dearborn, MI, USA, intravenously).

Hemodynamic and metabolic measures

MAP and heart rate were recorded continuously during the study. Cardiac output was determined by thermodilution in triplicate at baseline, at the end of hemorrhage, and then hourly throughout the remainder of the study. Stroke volume (SV) was calculated as cardiac output (ml/min)/heart rate (beat/min). Total peripheral resistance was calculated as (MAP-CVP)(mmHg)/CO (L/min).

Oxygen delivery was calculated as cardiac output (L/min) × arterial oxygen content (ml O2/100 ml blood) × 10/body wt (kg). Oxygen consumption (VO2) was calculated from the arterial (CaO2) and mixed venous (CvO2) oxygen content using established formulas. Percentage oxygen extraction was calculated as (CaO2 – CvO2)/CaO2. As we described previously[26], oxygen demand was calculated as plasma lactate (mmol/L from the arterial blood gas sample) + oxygen consumption (ml O2/min/kg), using the assumption as per Hannon and colleagues[27]. The oxygen delivery to oxygen demand ratio, an index of oxygen debt, was calculated as oxygen delivery/oxygen demand.

Analytical methods

Measurements of blood gas [pH, base excess, lactate, hematocrit (Hct), bicarbonate (HCO3-), etc.] and blood chemistry (total protein, electrolytes, etc.) were determined by standard clinical laboratory analysis. Hct and platelet counts were measured from citrated blood using an ABX Pentra 120 Hematology Analyzer (ABX Diagnostics, Inc., Irvine, CA). Plasma fibrinogen concentration, prothrombin time (PT), and activated partial prothrombin time (aPTT) were measured using the BCS Coagulation System (Dade Behring, Deerfield, IL).

The coagulation profile was assessed in fresh whole blood with pig thromboplastin by thrombelastograph® (TEG) using a TEG 5000 Hemostasis Analyzer (Haemoscope, Niles, IL) In TEG measurements, reaction time (R time) is the latency time for initial clot formation, K time reflects the speed to reach a certain level of clot strength, angle α reflects the rapidity of clot build-up and cross-linking, MA represents the maximum strength or stiffness of the clot, and LY60 indicates the percentage of clot lysis at 60 min after maximum clotting is achieved.

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM) and analyzed using SAS statistical software (Cary, NC). A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures using a Tukey adjustment was used to compare the changes over time between the groups. A one-way ANOVA with repeated measures using a Dunnett adjustment was used to compare the changes to baseline within the group. The statistically significant level was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Hemodynamics, cardiac-pulmonary function, and oxygen metabolic responses

All animals survived to the end of the 6 h study. No significant changes in the hemodynamics were observed in the control group over the experimental period. A 60% hemorrhage dropped MAP from the baseline value of 79 ± 6 mm Hg to 31 ± 3 mm Hg (p < 0.05). In the LR group, resuscitation with LR at 3 times bled volume (119 ± 7 ml/kg) led to a MAP that peaked briefly near pre-hemorrhage levels, but then fell and remained at hypotensive levels around 60 mmHg (Figure 2). In the NS group, 183 ± 9 ml/kg of NS was infused to achieve MAP similar to that in the LR group (Figure 2). Heart rate was increased by hemorrhage, followed by a partial decline after resuscitation in both groups. Heart rate returned to near baseline levels in the NS group, but remained higher over baseline in the LR group (Figure 2). Urine output rose with resuscitation in both groups with a larger increase in the NS group, followed by a decline to baseline values at 2 h after resuscitation in the LR group (Figure 2). From the start of resuscitation to 15 min after the completion of resuscitation, urine output in the NS group (23 ± 5 ml/kg) doubled that in the LR group (10 ± 3 ml/kg, with 1 ± 0 ml/kg in the control group). The total urine output over the 6 h resuscitation period in the NS group (45 ± 5 ml/kg) also doubled that in the LR group (21 ± 4 ml/kg, with 10 ± 1 ml/kg in the control group, all p < 0.05 LR versus NS, and LR or NS versus control).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1757-7241-21-86/MediaObjects/13049_2013_Article_716_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and urine output after hemorrhage and resuscitation with lactated Ringer’s solution (LR, 119 ± 7 ml/kg) or normal saline (NS, 183 ± 9 ml/kg) in pigs. *p < 0.05 compared to the corresponding baseline values. p < 0.05 compared to corresponding control values.

No significant changes in cardiac output, stroke volume, total peripheral resistance, oxygen content, or oxygen extraction were observed in controls during the experiment (Table 1). No significant changes in temperature were observed in any groups during the study. Cardiac output returned to pre-hemorrhage levels at the end of LR resuscitation (15 min). In contrast, cardiac output was increased 50% over BL by NS resuscitation and remained elevated in this group for the 6 h experimental period. Stroke volume returned to pre-hemorrhage levels with NS resuscitation (15 min), but remained below pre-hemorrhage levels for the 6 h experimental period after LR resuscitation (Table 1). Total peripheral resistance was decreased after resuscitation with LR or NS, with a lower resistance shown in the NS group vs. the LR group (Table 1).
Table 1

Changes of cardiac-pulmonary functions and hemodilution after hemorrhage and resuscitation with lactated Ringer’s (LR) solution or normal saline (NS) in pigs

 

Baseline

Resuscitation

3 h

6 h

Cardiac output (L/min)

Control

3.9 ± 0.3

4.3 ± 0.3

4.4 ± 0.4

3.6 ± 0.2

LR

3.7 ± 0.2

3.9 ± 0.3

3.5 ± 0.2

3.3 ± 0.2

NS

3.8 ± 0.3

5.9 ± 0.5*§♣

4.7 ± 0.3§

4.5 ± 0.2§♣

Stroke volume (ml/beat)

Control

36.5 ± 3.5

36.8 ± 2.2

36.8 ± 3.7

35.5 ± 3.9

LR

41.4 ± 3.3

24.9 ± 1.6*§♣

21.4 ± 2.3*§

24.7 ± 2.1*§

NS

38.2 ± 4.9

45.7 ± 4.7

38.1 ± 3.3

40.1 ± 3.3

Total Peripheral resistance (mm Hg/(L/min))

Control

20.4 ± 1.4

18.6 ± 2.0

17.3 ± 2.6

17.7 ± 1.3

LR

22.9 ± 1.0

17.7 ± 0.9*

17.9 ± 1.3*

17.4 ± 0.7*

NS

23.1 ± 1.8

12.5 ± 1.4*§

12.5 ± 0.7*§

12.0 ± 0.4*§

Hct (%)

Control

29.0 ± 0.8%

28.9 ± 0.9%

28.0 ± 0.9%

27.6 ± 1.0%

LR

30.2 ± 1.0%

13.1 ± 0.9%*

14.0 ± 0.7%*

14.7 ± 0.6%*

NS

29.0 ± 1.0%

11.6 ± 0.8 %*

12.5 ± 0.6%*

12.2 ± 0.7%*

Animal groups include control (C, n = 6), hemorrhage with LR resuscitation (LR, n = 6), and hemorrhage with normal saline resuscitation (NS, n = 6). Data are expressed as means ± SE.

*p < 0.05 compared to corresponding baseline values within the group; §p < 0.05 LR vs NS groups; and p < 0.05 compared to corresponding control values.

Oxygen metabolic responses to hemorrhage and resuscitation with LR or NS were described in Table 2 and Figure 3. Arterial PO2 and PCO2 were similar among the 3 groups during the study (Table 2). Venous PO2 returned to pre-hemorrhage levels 15 min after LR or NS resuscitation, but declined during the remaining 6 h with a larger decrease observed in LR group (Table 2). There were no differences in venous PCO2 among the 3 groups during the study (Table 2). Arterial oxygen content was decreased for 6 h after hemorrhage and resuscitation with LR or NS (Table 2). Venous oxygen content was also decreased for 6 h after hemorrhage and resuscitation with LR or NS (Table 2). Oxygen extraction was increased for 6 h after resuscitation with LR solution or NS. Oxygen delivery was reduced after resuscitation with LR, with no significant changes observed in the NS group (Figure 3A). Oxygen consumption remained unchanged in all three groups during the study (Figure 3B). Oxygen demand did not change after NS resuscitation, but doubled immediately after LR resuscitation, but returned to baseline values by 3 h (Figure 3C). Oxygen delivery to oxygen demand ratio, an index of oxygen debt, was decreased after NS resuscitation but returned to baseline value within 3 h, whereas a larger drop was observed after LR resuscitation and remained low over the course of the study (Figure 3D).
Table 2

Changes in oxygen content and extraction after hemorrhage and resuscitation with lactated Ringer’s (LR) solution or normal saline (NS) in pigs

 

Baseline

Resuscitation

3 h

6 h

Arterial O 2 (mmHg)

Control

475 ± 18

460 ± 15

497 ± 16

470 ± 15

LR

493 ± 15

513 ± 10

515 ± 15

499 ± 11

NS

478 ± 25

474 ± 21

490 ± 17

470 ± 16

Arterial CO 2 (mmHg)

Control

47 ± 4

48 ± 4

45 ± 3

45 ± 4

LR

44 ± 3

43 ± 3

45 ± 3

43 ± 2

NS

47 ± 2

43 ± 2

44 ± 2

44 ± 1

Venous O2 (mmHg)

Control

55 ± 5

60 ± 4

58 ± 5

50 ± 5

LR

56 ± 2

53 ± 3

36 ± 1*

36 ± 1*

NS

54 ± 2

53 ± 2

46 ± 2*

43 ± 1*♣§

Venous CO2 (mmHg)

Control

60 ± 5

57 ± 4

50 ± 3

51 ± 5

LR

53 ± 2

50 ± 2

56 ± 2

56 ± 1

NS

59 ± 5

50 ± 2

55 ± 1

55 ± 1

Arterial oxygen content (ml O2/dL blood)

Control

13.8 ± 0.6

13.8 ± 0.5

13.6 ± 0.3

13.3 ± 0.7

LR

14.7 ± 0.3

7.6 ± 0.3*

8.5 ± 0.6*

7.8 ± 0.4*

NS

13.2 ± 0.9

6.4 ± 0.4*

7.9 ± 0.4*

7.3 ± 0.4*

Venous oxygen content (ml O2/dL blood)

Control

9.9 ± 0.5

9.9 ± 0.7

9.3 ± 0.6

7.7 ± 0.9

LR

10.8 ± 0.2

4.3 ± 0.2*

3.5 ± 0.2*

3.1 ± 0.2*

NS

8.6 ± 0.6

4.1 ± 0.3*

4.2 ± 0.3*

3.8 ± 0.3*

Oxygen extraction (%)

Control

28 ± 4

29 ± 3

32 ± 3

32 ± 3

LR

28 ± 2

43 ± 2*

57 ± 3*

60 ± 3*

NS

35 ± 5

36 ± 3

47 ± 3*

49 ± 3*

Animal groups include control (C, n = 6), hemorrhage with LR resuscitation (LR, n = 6), and hemorrhage with normal saline resuscitation (NS, n = 6). Data are expressed as means ± SE.

*p < 0.05 compared to corresponding baseline values within the group; §p < 0.05 LR vs NS groups; and p < 0.05 compared to corresponding control values.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1757-7241-21-86/MediaObjects/13049_2013_Article_716_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Changes in oxygen delivery (A), oxygen consumption (B), oxygen demand (C), and oxygen delivery/oxygen demand (D) after hemorrhage and resuscitation with lactated Ringer’s solution (LR, 119 ± 7 ml/kg) or normal saline (NS, 183 ± 9 ml/kg) in pigs. *p < 0.05 compared to the corresponding baseline values. §p < 0.05 LR group compared to NS group. p < 0.05 compared to corresponding control values.

Hemodilution, acid base balance, and electrolytes

No significant changes in Hct, base excess, or lactate concentrations were observed in the control group over the entire experimental period. Significant hemodilution was observed after hemorrhage and resuscitation with LR or NS (Table 1). Total protein dropped from baseline value of 5.6 ± 0.2 g/dL to 2.7 ± 0.1 g/dL at 15 min and 3.3 ± 0.1 g/dL at 6 h after LR resuscitation and from baseline value of 5.7 ± 0.2 g/dL to 3.0 ± 0.2 g/dL at 15 min and 3.5 ± 0.2 g/dL at 6 h after NS resuscitation (all p < 0.05 vs. baseline). There were no significant differences in Hct (Table 1) or total protein between LR and NS groups during the 6 h after resuscitation.

Base excess fell below zero after hemorrhage and returned to pre-hemorrhage levels with LR resuscitation by 3 h but remained below pre-hemorrhage levels for 6 h with NS resuscitation (Figure 4). Plasma lactate levels rose about 4.5-fold above baseline values by hemorrhage and returned to pre-hemorrhage value within 15 min after NS resuscitation and at 6 h after LR resuscitation (Figure 4). Bicarbonate HCO3- levels were decreased by hemorrhage but returned to pre-hemorrhage values by 3 h after LR resuscitation, whereas no return was observed with NS resuscitation (Figure 4). Arterial pH was decreased from a pre-hemorrhage value of 7.41 ± 0.02 to 7.35 ± 0.01 after NS resuscitation (p < 0.05) but returned to pre-hemorrhage value at the 3 h time point. No significant changes in arterial pH occurred in the control or LR group during the study.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1757-7241-21-86/MediaObjects/13049_2013_Article_716_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Changes in acid-base status after hemorrhage and resuscitation with lactated Ringer’s solution (LR, 119 ± 7 ml/kg) or normal saline (NS, 183 ± 9 ml/kg) in pigs. *p < 0.05 compared to the corresponding baseline values. §p < 0.05 LR group compared to NS group. p < 0.05 compared to corresponding control values.

There were no significant changes in Na+, K+, Ca++, or Cl- in the control group during the entire study period (Table 3). Na+ was increased after NS resuscitation but returned to pre-hemorrahge level within 6 h. K+ did not change initially after NS resuscitation but was elevated at 6 h afterwards (Table 3). No changes in Na+ or K+ were observed in pigs with LR resuscitation (Table 3). Ca++ was similarly decreased at 15 min after resuscitation with LR or NS but returned to pre-hemorrhage levels by 6 h in both groups (Table 3). Cl- was elevated for 6 h after NS resuscitation, with no changes shown after LR resuscitation (Table 3).
Table 3

Changes of electrolytes after hemorrhage and resuscitation with lactated Ringer’s (LR) solution or normal saline (NS) in pigs

 

Baseline

After Hemorrhage and Resuscitation

6 h

Na + (mM)

Control

138 ± 3

139 ± 6

141 ± 2

LR

140 ± 3

138 ± 3

132 ± 3

NS

141 ± 2

150 ± 3*§♣

144 ± 6

K + (mM)

Control

4.5 ± 0.2

4.7 ± 0.4

4.6 ± 0.2

LR

4.3 ± 0.2

4.3 ± 0.2

5.2 ± 0.4

NS

4.5 ± 0.2

4.5 ± 0.3

5.7 ± 0.3*

Ca ++ (mM)

Control

9.2 ± 0.2

9.4 ± 0.3

8.9 ± 0.1

LR

9.5 ±0.4

7.7 ± 0.3*♣

8.3 ± 0.8

NS

9.4 ± 0.3

7.9 ± 0.2*♣

9.0 ± 0.3

Cl - (mM)

Control

97 ± 2

109 ± 8

100 ± 1

LR

101 ± 2

102 ± 2

97 ± 3

NS

102 ± 3

121 ± 6*

123 ± 6*

Animal groups include control (C, n = 6), hemorrhage with LR resuscitation (LR, n = 6), and hemorrhage with normal saline resuscitation (NS, n = 6). Data are expressed as means ± SE.

*p < 0.05 compared to corresponding baseline values within the group; §p < 0.05 LR vs NS groups; and p < 0.05 compared to corresponding control values.

Coagulatio n

Plasma fibrinogen concentration in control pigs remained unchanged during the study. Plasma fibrinogen concentration was decreased from a baseline value of 193 ± 12 mg/dL to 95 ± 5 mg/dL after LR resuscitation (p < 0.05) and from a baseline value of 189 ± 9 mg/dL to 101 ± 5 mg/dL after NS resuscitation (p < 0.05). Platelet count was decreased from the baseline value of 359 ± 54 103/μL to 172 ± 28 103/μL after LR resuscitation and from a baseline value of 427 ± 58 103/μL to 207 ± 29 103/μL after NS resuscitation (both p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between LR and NS groups in fibrinogen concentrations or platelet count during the 6 h after resuscitation.

There were no changes in TEG measurements in the control group during the study (Figure 5). R time and K times were shortened by hemorrhage but returned to near pre-hemorrhage values after resuscitation with LR or NS (Figure 5). Clotting speed (α-angle) was increased by hemorrhage and returned to pre-hemorrhage values after LR or NS resuscitation (Figure 5). Clot strength (MA) was not changed by hemorrhage but was similarly reduced by resuscitation with LR or NS, followed by return to baseline values within 3 h after resuscitation (Figure 5). No significant changes in fibrinolysis (LY60) were observed in any group during the study (data not shown).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1757-7241-21-86/MediaObjects/13049_2013_Article_716_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Changes in Thrombelastograph® (TEG) measurements after hemorrhage and resuscitation with lactated Ringer’s solution (LR, 119 ± 7 ml/kg) or normal saline (NS, 183 ± 9 ml/kg) in pigs. R time: latency time for initial fibrin formation. K time: a measure of speed to reach a certain level of clot strength. Angle a: the rapidity of fibrin build up and cross-linking. MA: maximum strength of the developed clot. *p < 0.05 compared to the corresponding baseline values.

Plasma PT or PTT was not changed by hemorrhage. PT was similarly prolonged by resuscitation with LR (from 11.2 ± 0.2 sec at baseline to 12.1 ± 0.2 sec at 6 h) and NS (from 11.2 ± 0.3 sec at baseline to 12.3 ± 0.3 sec at 6 h, both p < 0.05). Plasma aPTT was also similarly prolonged by resuscitation with LR (from 17.1 ± 0.5 sec baseline to 20.1 ± 1.2 sec at 6 h) or NS (from 17.1 ± 0.3 sec baseline to 19.1 ± 0.5 sec at 6 h, both p < 0.05).

Discussion

Using a large-animal model with severe hemorrhage and 6 h follow-up, we performed a comprehensive assessment of the physiologic and biochemical effects of LR and NS. To achieve a similar hypotensive resuscitation level 50% more volume of normal saline was required than LR to achieve similar responses in MAP. Hemodilution, however, was not different between groups indicating that that the additional NS did not stay in the vascular, as supported by the greater urine output in the NS group. In addition, NS resulted in a lower peripheral resistance and a higher stroke volume, possibly due to its vasodilation effects. Despite similar oxygen extraction and oxygen consumption, NS resuscitation resulted in better oxygen delivery and oxygen delivery-to-oxygen demand ratio as an index of oxygen debt. This better response appears to be primarily due to vasodilation effects as suggested by the large increase in cardiac output compared to the LR group. Thus, in the current severe hemorrhage model, NS had better tissue perfusion and oxygen metabolism than LR. However, since the oxygen delivery to demand ratio was 1 or higher in the LR and NS groups at 6 hrs, both fluids seemed adequate in maintaining survival at least through 6 h.

Significant separation was observed between LR and NS in acid base balance in this study, as expected. LR resuscitation returned BE and bicarbonate to pre-hemorrhage levels within 3 h, but no return of BE or bicarbonate was observed for 6 hr with NS resuscitation. Similar changes of BE and bicarbonate from LR or NS have been shown in different animal models and in patients[18, 19, 28]. The impact of acid base status from resuscitation fluids on survival has been assessed by Traverso et al. in an anaesthetized swine model with fatal hemorrhage[18]. With equal volume resuscitation from NS (pH 5.0), LR (pH 6.5, 28 mM lactate), and Plasmalyte-A (pH 7.4, 27 mM acetate), the LR group had the best survival and the Plasmalyte-A had the worst survival rate[18]. But BE and pH from LR and Plasmalyte-A resuscitation were similar and higher than those from NS[18], suggesting a better acid base status was not necessarily attributable to a better survival. Nevertheless, as an index of shock, improved BE should be a goal to improve outcome and acidosis is associated with well-known detrimental effects on the cardiovascular system and coagulation[29, 30].

Clinical trials have failed to show significant differences in outcomes of LR and NS resuscitation. In comparative trials of LR and NS performed in patients who underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm repair or renal transplant, Waters et al.[15] and Khajavi et al.[28] reported that there were no differences in clinical outcomes, such as duration of ventilation, ICU stay, or incidence of complication between patients resuscitated with LR or NS, although the patient group with NS resuscitation was more acidotic. Using a rat model with hemorrhage and simultaneous resuscitation, Healey et al. found that NS and LR had equivalent survival rates under moderate hemorrhage (36% of estimated blood volume). But with a massive hemorrhage (218% of estimated blood volume), LR resuscitation resulted in better survival[17]. Thus, it appears that the separation of outcomes from LR and NS becomes apparent only under extreme circumstance, such as when greater than 1 blood volume of fluid is given.

Lactate rose about 5 fold after 60% hemorrhage in this study and returned to pre-hemorrhage levels after resuscitation with LR or NS. The recovery rates, however, were different: NS returned lactate to pre-hemorrhage level within 15 min, but lactate did not return to near pre-hemorrhage level for at least 3 h after resuscitation. At 15 min after resuscitation, lactate levels were 8.7 ± 1.2 mM in the LR group and 2.6 ± 0.8 mM in the NS group. This difference could result from lactate load from LR resuscitation or from a larger-volume dilution from NS resuscitation. Calculation of fluid inflow and outflow suggested that the latter is unlikely. From the start of resuscitation to 15 min after the completion of resuscitation, a total of 4.6 ± 0.3 L of LR was infused and urine output was 0.46 ± 0.15 L in the LR group, with a net fluid inflow of 4.1 L. During the same period a total of 6.1 ± 0.1 L of NS was infused for resuscitation while urine output was 0.81 ± 0.18 L, with a net fluid inflow of 4.9 L. This 20% volume difference (4.1 L of LR vs. 4.9 L of NS) would not be able to fully explain the observed 3.5fold difference of lactate between the LR (8.7 mM) and NS (2.6 mM) group. Thus, the difference of lactate levels at 15 min after resuscitation may relate to the lactate load from LR resuscitation, at least in part. However, this difference gradually disappeared within 6 h with a simultaneous increase of HCO3- in the LR group, suggesting that an ongoing lactate metabolism in pigs and the production of bicarbonate may contribute to the better acid-base status from lactate resuscitation. Since the metabolism of lactate in humans takes a few hours and involves producing H+ and HCO3-[31], a similar time frame observed in the present study indicates similar lactate metabolism in humans and pigs. In addition, current blood bank guidelines state that LR should not be mixed with blood to prevent the risk of clot formation from calcium included in LR, which can diminish the anti-coagulation effect in stored blood. Thus, LR resuscitation should not be given with blood through the same iv-line and crystalloids should be avoided in patients with blood transfusion.

Hemorrhage and resuscitation caused disturbances in the coagulation process. PT and aPTT were prolonged for 6 h after hemorrhage and resuscitation, suggesting a hypocoagulable states. In contrast, the TEG data suggested a hypercoagulable states. These differences between TEG and standard plasma assays were also observed in burn and trauma patients[32, 33]. Clotting initiation was shortened, and clotting speed was accelerated by hemorrhage; but both returned to pre-hemorrhage values after resuscitation. Clot strength was compromised after resuscitation but returned within 3 h. Despite these dynamic changes in the coagulation profile, there were no differences between LR and NS resuscitation during the study, suggesting the equivalent effects of the two fluids on coagulation. In contrast, a faster clotting speed and better clot strength from LR resuscitation were reported by Kiraly et al.[19]. This discrepancy is likely due to the differences in study design. The present study used a swine model with controlled hemorrhage with 50% more volume of NS, whereas Kiraly et al. used a swine model of liver injury and an uncontrolled hemorrhage with 150% more volume of NS used. The additional hemodilution from the 150% NS might contribute to the different findings. In addition, a sham control group was included in the present study and our data showed that coagulation profiles from LR and NS resuscitation returned to pre-hemorrhage values and became similar to those of the control values. Thus, potential thrombotic risk from LR resuscitation is unlikely.

In order to make a valid comparison, a common physiological endpoint after resuscitation is needed to assess the effects of resuscitation. In this study, we used post-resuscitation MAP as the physiological endpoint to compare the effects of LR and NS on hemodynamics, coagulation and metabolism. We found that NS required 50% more volume to reach the same physiological endpoint. If the same volume of resuscitation was used in LR and NS groups, we suspected that the blood pressure after NS resuscitation would be lower than that of LR due to its vasodilator effects.

A fixed volume controlled hemorrhage model was used in this study to investigate metabolic, hemodynamic and coagulation effects of hypovolemia and fluid resuscitation. This model mimics situations where trauma patients bleed an amount of blood before hemorrhage is controlled[34]. However, it is limited in reflecting coagulation changes under a clinical scenario of continued bleeding (or rebleeding). It is likely the on-going bleeding from uncontrolled hemorrhage will exaggerate the impact of vasodilation effects from NS, with higher volumes infused and more hemodilution and coagulation impairment. Considering that restriction on resuscitation fluid has been shown improving survival in uncontrolled bleeding patients[35] and animals[36], a larger volume of NS, as compared to LR, would increase bleeding with resultant higher morbidities and mortality in trauma patients.

In this study, to reach the same resuscitative physiological endpoint, NS required 50% more volume and was associated with a higher cardiac output and lower peripheral resistance, as compared to LR resuscitation. These differences are possibly due to the vasodilator effects from NS. It is worth emphasizing that these effects are likely to be exaggerated under uncontrolled hemorrhage, resulting in more fluid volume, a larger hemodilution, and more severe impairment in coagulation. Further, an elevation of K+ was observed at 6 h post NS resuscitation, while no change of K+ was observed after LR resuscitation. The mechanism for the increase of K+ from NS is not fully known, but may be due to an extracellular shift of potassium caused by changes in blood hydrogen ion concentration, as the result of hyperchloremic acidosis from NS resuscitation[37]. Consistent with our current results, clinically significant hyperkalemia from NS administration has been reported in patients during renal transplantation[16, 28]. Thus, NS is associated with vasodilator effects and the risks of metabolic acidosis and hyperkalemia. Currently, military first responders have NS, LR and Hextend available[20]. However, the results from the current study and our recent study[38] suggest that all of these fluids have limitations in managing hemodynamics, metabolic responses, and coagulation. The optimum resuscitation fluid awaits further development.

Conclusions

We compared resuscitative effects of NS and LR in a swine model with 60% controlled hemorrhage. Although LR and NS had equivalent effects on hemodynamics and oxygen metabolism, NS required a larger resuscitation volume and was associated with poor acid base status and elevated serum potassium in this model. Thus, NS may be inferior to LR in resuscitation due to its vasodilator effects and the risks of metabolic acidosis and hyperkalemia.

Abbreviations

BE: 

Base excess

BL: 

Baseline

IV: 

Intravenous

LR: 

Lactated Ringer’s

MAP: 

Mean arterial pressure

NS: 

Normal saline

PT: 

Prothrombin time

aPTT: 

Activated partial prothrombin time

TEG: 

Thrombelastography®

TEG: 

measurements

R time: 

Latency time for initial fibrin formation

K time: 

a measure of speed to reach a certain level of clot strength

Angle α: 

the rapidity of fibrin build up and cross-linking

MA: 

Maximum strength of the clot

LY60: 

Percentage of clot lysis at 60 min after MA is achieved.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the support received from the Veterinary Service Support Branch and Laboratory Support Branch at the U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research.

This study was supported by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command. The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the author and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
US Army Institute of Surgical Research, JBSA Ft

References

  1. Mullins RJ: Management of Shock. 1996, Philadelphia, Stamford, CT: Appleton & LangeGoogle Scholar
  2. Maier RV: Shock. Surgery:Scientific Principles and Practice. Edited by: Greenfield LJ, Mulholland MW, Oldham KT, Zelenock GB, Lillemoe KD. 1997, Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven, 182-215. 2Google Scholar
  3. Tapia NM, Suliburk J, Mattox KL: The initial trauma center fluid management of penetrating injury: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013, 471 (12): 3961-3973. 10.1007/s11999-013-3122-4.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Duchesne JC, Heaney J, Guidry C, McSwain N, Meade P, Cohen M, Schreiber M, Inaba K, Skiada D, Demetriades D: Diluting the benefits of hemostatic resuscitation: a multi-institutional analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013, 75 (1): 76-82. 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182987df3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Carlino W: Damage control resuscitation from major haemorrhage in polytrauma. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013, [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  6. Dutton RP: Haemostatic resuscitation. Br J Anaesth. 2012, 109 (Suppl 1): i39-i46. 10.1093/bja/aes389.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Spoerke N, Michalek J, Schreiber M, Brasel KJ, Vercruysse G, MacLeod J, Dutton RP, Duchesne JC, McSwain NE, Muskat P: Crystalloid resuscitation improves survival in trauma patients receiving low ratios of fresh frozen plasma to packed red blood cells. J Trauma. 2011, 71 (2 Suppl 3): S380-S383.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Foex BA: How the cholera epidemic of 1831 resulted in a new technique for fluid resuscitation. Emerg Med J. 2003, 20 (4): 316-318. 10.1136/emj.20.4.316.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Awad S, Allison SP, Lobo DN: The history of 0.9% saline. Clin Nutr. 2008, 27 (2): 179-188. 10.1016/j.clnu.2008.01.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Belani KG, Palahniuk RJ: Kidney transplantation. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 1991, 29 (3): 17-39. 10.1097/00004311-199122000-00003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Banks AAoB: Accreditation Requirements Manual. 1994, Arlington: American Association of Blood Banks, 5Google Scholar
  12. Wilkes NJ, Woolf R, Mutch M, Mallett SV, Peachey T, Stephens R, Mythen MG: The effects of balanced versus saline-based hetastarch and crystalloid solutions on acid-base and electrolyte status and gastric mucosal perfusion in elderly surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2001, 93 (4): 811-816. 10.1097/00000539-200110000-00003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Williams EL, Hildebrand KL, McCormick SA, Bedel MJ: The effect of intravenous lactated Ringer’s solution versus 0.9% sodium chloride solution on serum osmolality in human volunteers. Anesth Analg. 1999, 88 (5): 999-1003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Scheingraber S, Rehm M, Sehmisch C, Finsterer U: Rapid saline infusion produces hyperchloremic acidosis in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery. Anesthesiology. 1999, 90 (5): 1265-1270. 10.1097/00000542-199905000-00007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Waters JH, Gottlieb A, Schoenwald P, Popovich MJ, Sprung J, Nelson DR: Normal saline versus lactated Ringer’s solution for intraoperative fluid management in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: an outcome study. Anesth Analg. 2001, 93 (4): 817-822. 10.1097/00000539-200110000-00004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. O’Malley CM, Frumento RJ, Hardy MA, Benvenisty AI, Brentjens TE, Mercer JS, Bennett-Guerrero E: A randomized, double-blind comparison of lactated Ringer’s solution and 0.9% NaCl during renal transplantation. Anesth Analg. 2005, 100 (5): 1518-1524. 10.1213/01.ANE.0000150939.28904.81. table of contentsView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Healey MA, Davis RE, Liu FC, Loomis WH, Hoyt DB: Lactated ringer’s is superior to normal saline in a model of massive hemorrhage and resuscitation. J Trauma. 1998, 45 (5): 894-899. 10.1097/00005373-199811000-00010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Traverso LW, Hollenbach SJ, Bolin RB, Langford MJ, DeGuzman LR: Fluid resuscitation after an otherwise fatal hemorrhage: II. Colloid solutions. J Trauma. 1986, 26 (2): 176-182. 10.1097/00005373-198602000-00015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kiraly LN, Differding JA, Enomoto TM, Sawai RS, Muller PJ, Diggs B, Tieu BH, Englehart MS, Underwood S, Wiesberg TT: Resuscitation with normal saline (NS) vs. lactated ringers (LR) modulates hypercoagulability and leads to increased blood loss in an uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock swine model. J Trauma. 2006, 61 (1): 57-64. 10.1097/01.ta.0000220373.29743.69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lairet JR, Bebarta VS, Burns CJ, Lairet KF, Rasmussen TE, Renz EM, King BT, Fernandez W, Gerhardt R, Butler F: Prehospital interventions performed in a combat zone: a prospective multicenter study of 1,003 combat wounded. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012, 73 (2 Suppl 1): S38-S42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Butler FK: Tactical combat casualty care: update 2009. J Trauma. 2010, 69 (Suppl 1): S10-S13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lipsky AM, Ganor O, Abramovich A, Katzenell U, Glassberg E: Walking between the drops: Israeli defense forces’ fluid resuscitation protocol. J Emerg Med. 2013, 44 (4): 790-795. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.08.029.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Holcomb JBSP: Optimal use of blood in trauma patients. Biologicals. 2010, 38 (1): 6-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Burns JW, Baer LA, Darlington DN, Dubick MA, Wade CE: Screening of potential small volume resuscitation products using a severe hemorrhage sedated swine model. Int J Burns Trauma. 2012, 2 (1): 59-67.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Salomone JP PP: Prehospital Trauma Life Support: Military Version. 2007, St. Louis, Missouri: MOSBY Elsevier, 6Google Scholar
  26. Sondeen JL, Prince MD, Kheirabadi BS, Wade CE, Polykratis IA, de Guzman R, Dubick MA: Initial resuscitation with plasma and other blood components reduced bleeding compared to hetastarch in anesthetized swine with uncontrolled splenic hemorrhage. Transfusion. 2011, 51 (4): 779-792. 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02928.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hannon JP, Wade CE, Bossone CA, Hunt MM, Loveday JA: Oxygen delivery and demand in conscious pigs subjected to fixed-volume hemorrhage and resuscitated with 7.5% NaCl in 6% Dextran. Circ Shock. 1989, 29 (3): 205-217.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Khajavi MR, Etezadi F, Moharari RS, Imani F, Meysamie AP, Khashayar P, Najafi A: Effects of normal saline vs. lactated ringer’s during renal transplantation. Ren Fail. 2008, 30 (5): 535-539. 10.1080/08860220802064770.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Martini WZ, Pusateri AE, Uscilowicz JM, Delgado AV, Holcomb JB: Independent contributions of hypothermia and acidosis to coagulopathy in swine. J Trauma. 2005, 58 (5): 1002-1009. 10.1097/01.TA.0000156246.53383.9F. discussion 1009–1010View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Martini WZ, Dubick MA, Pusateri AE, Park MS, Ryan KL, Holcomb JB: Does bicarbonate correct coagulation function impaired by acidosis in swine?. J Trauma. 2006, 61 (1): 99-106. 10.1097/01.ta.0000215574.99093.22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hartmann AF, Senn MJ: Studies in the metabolism of sodium r-lactate. III. Resuponse of human subjects with liver damage, disturbed warter and mineral balance, and renal insufficiency to the intravenous injection of sodium r-lactate. J Clin Invest. 1932, 11 (2): 345-355. 10.1172/JCI100416.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Park MS, Martini WZ, Dubick MA, Salinas J, Butenas S, Kheirabadi BS, Pusateri AE, Vos JA, Guymon CH, Wolf SE: Thromboelastography as a better indicator of hypercoagulable state after injury than prothrombin time or activated partial thromboplastin time. J Trauma. 2009, 67 (2): 266-275. 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181ae6f1c. discussion 275–266PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Martini WZ, Cortez DS, Dubick MA, Park MS, Holcomb JB: Thrombelastography is better than PT, aPTT, and activated clotting time in detecting clinically relevant clotting abnormalities after hypothermia, hemorrhagic shock and resuscitation in pigs. J Trauma. 2008, 65 (3): 535-543. 10.1097/TA.0b013e31818379a6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Bellamy RF, Maningas PA, Wenger BA: Current shock models and clinical correlations. Ann Emerg Med. 1986, 15 (12): 1392-1395. 10.1016/S0196-0644(86)80922-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Bickell WH, Wall MJ, Pepe PE, Martin RR, Ginger VF, Allen MK, Mattox KL: Immediate versus delayed fluid resuscitation for hypotensive patients with penetrating torso injuries. N Engl J Med. 1994, 331 (17): 1105-1109. 10.1056/NEJM199410273311701.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hahn RG: Fluid therapy in uncontrolled hemorrhage–what experimental models have taught us. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013, 57 (1): 16-28. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02763.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Halperin ML, Kamel KS: Potassium. Lancet. 1998, 352 (9122): 135-140. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)85044-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Martini WZ, Dubick MA, Blackbourne LH: Comparisons of lactated Ringer’s and Hextend resuscitation on hemodynamics and coagulation following femur injury and severe hemorrhage in pigs. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013, 74 (3): 732-740. 10.1097/TA.0b013e31827f156d.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Martini et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement