Open Access

Early brain computed tomography findings are associated with outcome in patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

  • Soo Hyun Kim1,
  • Seung Pill Choi1,
  • Kyu Nam Park1,
  • Chun Song Youn1,
  • Sang Hoon Oh1 and
  • Se Min Choi1, 2Email author
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine201321:57

DOI: 10.1186/1757-7241-21-57

Received: 6 March 2013

Accepted: 12 July 2013

Published: 19 July 2013

Abstract

Background

This study evaluated the association between the results of immediate brain computed tomography (CT) scans and outcome in patients who were treated with therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest. The evaluation was based on the changes in the ratio of gray matter to white matter.

Methods

A total of 167 patients who were successfully resuscitated after cardiac arrest from March 2009 to December 2011 were included in this study. We selected 51 patients who received a brain CT scan within 1 hour after the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and who had been treated with therapeutic hypothermia. Circular regions of measurement (10 mm2) were placed over regions of interest (ROIs), and the average attenuations in gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) were recorded in the basal ganglia, at the level of the centrum semiovale and in the high convexity area. Three GM-to-WM ratios (GWRs) were calculated: one for the basal ganglia, one for the cerebrum and the average of the two. The neurological outcomes were assessed using the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) scale at the time of hospital discharge, and a good neurological outcome was defined as a CPC score of 1 or 2.

Results

The average GWR was the strongest predictor of poor neurological outcome as determined using receiver operating characteristic curves (basal ganglia area under the curve (AUC) = 0.716; cerebrum AUC = 0.685; average AUC = 0.747). An average GWR < 1.14 predicted a poor neurological outcome with a sensitivity of 13.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.8-30.7), a specificity of 100% (95% CI 83.9-100), a positive predictive value of 100% (95% CI 2.5-100), and a negative predictive value of 44.7% (CI 28.9-58.9).

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that low GWRs in the immediate brain CT scans of patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia after ROSC were associated with poor neurological outcomes. Immediate brain CT scans could help predict outcome after cardiac arrest.

Keywords

Cardiac arrest Brain computed tomography Therapeutic hypothermia Prognosis

Background

Cardiac arrest is a significant public health problem. Over 300,000 cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest occur in North America annually, and the patient fatality rate approaches 95% [1]. The treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors has changed dramatically over the past decade. Aggressive therapeutic interventions, such as therapeutic hypothermia and thrombolysis, implemented immediately after resuscitation have been attempted to improve the outcomes for OHCA [24].

Brain injury significantly contributes to mortality in patients after cardiac arrest. The majority of patients who are resuscitated after cardiac arrest are comatose due to ischemic brain injury. The clinicians who treat comatose patients after cardiac arrest have struggled with difficult decisions about the continued provision of intensive care. Therefore, accurate methods for predicting patient outcomes at the earliest time are required. Several diagnostic modalities may predict the outcome of OHCA survivors, including the use of blood markers and electrophysiological studies [5, 6].

A previous study reported that in contrast to Europe, SAH is more frequently found in Asia, up to 16.2% of the OHCA survivors [7]. After the resuscitation of comatose patients, an immediate computed tomography (CT) scan is one of the most frequently used ancillary imaging modalities to identify brain lesions such as stroke, intracranial hemorrhage and to decide whether therapeutic hypothermia is indicated. CT scans are easily obtained in comatose cardiac arrest patients, and anesthetic agents or other treatments do not influence the results. Therefore, CT scans are frequently ordered to evaluate comatose patients after cardiac arrest.

Cerebral edema is a marker of severe brain injury associated cardiac arrest. This type of edema appears as a loss of differentiation between gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) on brain CT images. Several previous studies have found that the level of differentiation between the GM and the WM is significantly lower in post-cardiac arrest patients with poor outcomes than in patients with good outcomes [8, 9]. However, following implementation of therapeutic hypothermia, as with other diagnostic modalities, the ability of brain CT to predict outcome in patients after cardiac arrest needs to be reassessed.

We evaluated the association between the CT signs and the outcomes of patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest. This evaluation was based on the decrease in the GM to WM ratio (GWR) obtained from a brain CT scan performed within 1 hour after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).

Materials and methods

Patients

This retrospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary urban educational hospital, the Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, from March 2009 to December 2011. Our institutional review board approved this study. Inclusion criteria were an age >18 years, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest unrelated to trauma and the return of spontaneous circulation. We identified subjects who had obtained a brain CT scan immediately (within 1 hour) after ROSC, including transfer patients from outside hospitals and patients who were treated with therapeutic hypothermia. In accordance with our institutional protocol for post cardiac arrest care, comatose patients who were successfully resuscitated received brain CT scans immediately to determine the cause of arrest. Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) was initiated as soon as possible using bags of ice and the infusion of 4°C normal saline simultaneously with other procedures, including CT scans. Patients whose CT scans indicated parenchymal abnormalities, patients who did not complete the therapeutic hypothermia process due to hemodynamic instability or patients for whom CT images were not available for analysis were excluded from the analysis.

Therapeutic hypothermia

All unconscious patients who were resuscitated from nontraumatic OHCA and brought to the emergency department were eligible for the TH. Patients were excluded from the TH according to the following criteria: evidence of significant active bleeding, any intracranial hemorrhage, hemodynamic instability unresponsive to volume resuscitation and vasopressor treatment, severe dysrhythmia unresponsive to antiarrhythmic therapy, known terminal illness, poor prearrest neurologic status, and those with a “do not attempt resuscitation” preference. Ultimately, deciding whether a TH was initiated was up to the discretion of the treating physicians.

To induce TH, patients were covered with ice bags over the neck, axillae, torso, and groins. In addition, TH was induced by rapid intravenous infusion of 1–2 L of 4°C saline, evaporative cooling by moist fanning, fully exposing patient, an endovascular cooling device (Thermogard XP® Thermal Management System; Zoll, Sunnyvale, CA) or some combination of these techniques. An arterial line was inserted before TH induction. Patients were given sedation (midazolam), analgesia (fentanyl), and a paralyzing agent (rocuronium). Neuromuscular blockade was discontinued when the goal temperature was reached, but if shivering was not controlled with the sedative and analgesic agents, the continuous infusion of a neuromuscular blocker was restarted. These agents were stopped during rewarming as soon as the central temperature reached 35°C. The goal was to achieve a temperature of 32–34°C as soon as possible and to maintain it for 24 hours. The endovascular cooling device was adjusted manually to keep temperatures close to a goal of 33°C. Rewarming was then started at a rate of 0.25°C/h with absolute avoidance of any active measure, first to a target of 36°C and then ensuring that 37.5°C was not exceeded and using an endovascular cooling device, until 72 hours had elapsed from the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).

Data collection

Medical records were collected for the patients who were included this study. The following demographic and clinical data were collected for each patient: age, sex, underlying disease (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, renal disease, pulmonary disease, stroke), cause of arrest, witnessed collapse, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), initially presenting rhythm after arrest, resuscitation time, time from ROSC to CT obtained, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, neurological examination on admission, discharge status and Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) scale at the time of hospital discharge. The neurological outcomes of the patients were assessed using the CPC scale at the time of hospital discharge, and a good neurological outcome was defined as a CPC score of 1 or 2.

CT measurements

Only non-contrast brain CT scans were performed. All of the recorded CT scans that were taken at the time of admission to the emergency department were included in this study. A 64-channel scanner (LightSpeed VCT; GE HealthCare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA) was used for all of the CT studies with a 5-mm slice width. Two investigators, who were blinded to the clinical data, independently accessed the CT scan slices for each patient’s brain at the level of the basal ganglia, defined as the image in which the caudate nucleus, internal capsule, third ventricle, and sylvian fissures were visualized, and at two levels of the superior cortex, as described previously: (1) the centrum semiovale level, defined as the image 5 mm above the lateral ventricular system, and (2) the high convexity level, defined as the next image 5 mm above the centrum semiovale level [8, 9]. The measurement cursor was configured as a 10 mm2 circular surface. Circular regions of measurement were placed over the regions of interest (ROI) in the right and left sides, and the average attenuation in Hounsfield Units (HU) was recorded. The values at the basal ganglia level were recorded in the caudate nucleus (CN), putamen (PU), corpus callosum (CC), and the posterior limb of the internal capsule (PIC). The values at the level of the centrum semiovale were recorded in the medial cortex (MC1) and the medial white matter (MW1). The values at the high convexity area were recorded using the same method (MC2 and MW2, respectively). We calculated three GWRs: the basal ganglia, cerebrum and average GWRs [10]. The GWRs were calculated according to the following formulas (Figure 1):

GWR Basal ganglia = (CN + PU)/(CC + PIC)

GWR Cerebrum = (MC1 + MC2)/(MW1 + MW2)

GWR Average = (GWR Basal ganglia + GWR Cerebrum)/2
Figure 1

Brain computed tomography images showing measurements in Hounsfield units at the basal ganglia level (left), the centrum semiovale level (middle), and the high convexity level (right) . The circular regions of interest (10 mm2) are positioned in the caudate nucleus, putamen, posterior limb of the internal capsule, and genu of the corpus callosum at the level of the basal ganglia and are positioned in the medial cortex and medial white matter at the centrum semiovale and high convexity levels.

Statistical analyses

Categorical data are expressed as frequencies and percentages. We tested the distributions of the continuous variables (raw HU measurements and GWR) for normality using visual inspection and the Shapiro-Wilk test. Normally distributed data are expressed as the means and standard deviations using Student’s-t test. Non-normally distributed data were assessed using the Mann–Whitney U test. Chi-squared tests were used to identify differences in patient demographic data between the two groups. We examined the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to determine the optimal (maximum specificity) threshold value of the GWR for the prediction of poor neurological outcomes. We expressed the performance of each measure for the prediction of poor neurological outcomes as the area under the curve (AUC) for the ROC curves. We determined the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value at the optimal cutoff, which was selected from each ROC curve. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software, version 17.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant for all comparisons.

Results

Patient demographics

A total of 333 adult patients who suffered non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were admitted to our emergency department between January 2009 and December 2011. A total of 167 of these patients recovered spontaneous circulation after resuscitation, and post-cardiac arrest care was initiated. OHCA survivors (N = 109) underwent brain CT scans. Eighty-nine of the 109 survivors received an immediate brain CT within 1 hour. Twelve of the 89 survivors (13.5%) who received an immediate brain CT exhibited intracranial hemorrhages (especially subarachnoid hemorrhages). We excluded subjects with previous intracranial lesions (N = 2) and subjects in whom post-cardiac arrest care was withdrawn, in whom the hemodynamic status was not sustained during therapeutic hypothermia or for whom therapeutic hypothermia was not indicated (N = 17). We also excluded CT images that were not available for analysis, including CT scans that were performed at an outside hospital (N = 7). A total of 51 CT scans were analyzed (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Subjects included in the study.

The demographic data of the enrolled patients are summarized in Table 1. The mean age was 53.9 years old, and 66.7% of the patients were male. The median time to CT after ROSC was 16.0 minutes. All of the patients included in this study were comatose, with GCS scores below 6 points. In 27.5% and 21.6% of patients, respectively, pupillary light reflexes and corneal reflexes were present immediately after ROSC. Twenty-nine (56.9%) patients survived and were discharged from the hospital. Twenty-one (41.2%) of these patients achieved good neurologic outcome. (CPC1 = 18, CPC2 = 3). In most of pre arrest baseline variables, there are no significant differences between the two groups. However, there are significant differences in some variables associated with resuscitation such as witnessed, cardiac etiology and post-resuscitation neurologic exams.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the patients included in this study

 

Good outcome (n = 21)

Poor outcome (n = 30)

p

Age, years, mean ± SD

55.3 ± 14.6

51.3 ± 16.8

0.365

Male, N (%)

17 (56.7)

16 (76.2)

0.200

Underlying disease, N (%)

   

 Hypertension

2 (9.5)

7 (23.3)

0.203

 Diabetes

2 (9.5)

4 (13.3)

0.678

 Stroke

0

2 (6.7)

0.227

 Coronary disease

4 (19.0)

1 (3.3)

0.063

 Renal disease

0

1 (3.3)

0.398

 Pulmonary disease

0

4 (13.3)

0.081

Witnessed arrest, N (%)

16 (53.3)

19 (90.5)

0.005

Bystander CPR, N (%)

11 (36.7)

12 (57.1)

0.100

Shockable rhythm, N (%)

5 (16.7)

15 (71.4)

<0.001

Cardiac etiology, N (%)

15 (50.0)

20 (95.2)

0.001

Time, min, median (IQR)

   

 collapse to CPR start

1.0 (0.0-6.0)

7.5 (3.75-21.0)

0.009

 CPR start to ROSC

20.0 (12.0-31.5)

23.5 (19.0-30.0)

0.276

 collapse to ROSC

25.0 (19.0-35.5)

34.5 (25.8-48.3)

0.018

Epinephrine dose during resuscitation, median (IQR)

3.0 (2.0-4.0)

2.0 (0.0-5.0)

0.388

Time from ROSC to CT, min, median (IQR)

15.5 (6.8-25.8)

13.0 (6.5-21.5)

0.619

Neurologic examination after ROSC, N (%)

   

 GCS scores 3

14 (66.7)

30 (100.0)

0.009

 GCS scores 4

1 (4.8)

0

 

 GCS scores 5

3 (14.3)

0

 

 GCS scores 6

3 (14.3)

0

 

 Present pupillary light reflex

10 (47.6)

4 (13.3)

0.007

 Present corneal reflex

9 (42.9)

2 (6.7)

0.002

 Present motor response

8 (38.1)

0

<0.001

Outcome

   

 Length of hospital stay, days, median (IQR)

16.0 (13.0-29.0)

4.0 (3.0-7.3)

<0.001

 Survival discharge, N (%)

21

8

 

SD standard deviation, CT computed tomography, ROSC return of spontaneous circulation, OHCA out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, IQR interquartile range, CPR cardiopulmonary resuscitation, GCS Glasgow coma scale.

Measurement of attenuation in CT image

In the good outcome group, the GM attenuations were greater than in the poor outcome group. However, the WM attenuations were similar between the two groups. The GM attenuations at the basal ganglia level (CN and PU) and in the medial cortex at the high convexity level (MC2) were significantly different between the good and poor neurological outcome groups (P = 0.030, 0.038 and 0.043, respectively), but the GM attenuations in the medical cortex at the centrum semiovale level (MC1) were not significantly different. None of the WM attenuations (CC, PIC, MW1, and MW2) differed between the two groups (Table 2, Figure 3). The inter-rater reliability of the attenuation measurements between the two investigators exhibited a high Pearson’s correlation coefficient of 0.965 (P < 0.001), which indicated a strong correlation.
Table 2

Comparisons of the attenuations in Hounsfield units in regions of interest and of the gray matter-to-white matter ratio between groups

   

Good outcome (N = 21)

Poor outcome (N = 30)

P

Basal ganglia

Gray matter

CN

37.6 ± 1.4

36.6 ± 1.8

0.030

 

PU

38.3 ± 1.7

36.7 ± 2.5

0.038

White matter

CC

29.8 ± 2.0

29.8 ± 2.2

0.946

 

PIC

29.0 ± 2.0

29.9 ± 2.2

0.094

Centrum semiovale

Gray matter

MC1

36.8 ± 1.3

35.9 ± 2.0

0.072

White matter

MW1

30.3 ± 1.9

30.3 ± 3.2

0.990

High convexity area

Gray matter

MC2

37.8 ± 1.9

36.1 ± 2.4

0.043

White matter

MW2

30.5 ± 1.7

30.4 ± 3.0

0.927

Gray-White matter Ratio (GWR)

   

 Basal ganglia

1.30 ± 0.09

1.23 ± 0.07

0.005

 Cerebrum

1.23 ± 0.06

1.19 ± 0.07

0.041

 Average

1.26 ± 0.07

1.21 ± 0.06

0.003

CN caudate nucleus, PU putamen, CC corpus callosum, PIC posterior internal capsule, MC1 medial cortex at the centrum semiovale, MW1 medial white matter at the centrum semiovale, MC2 medial cortex at the high convexity level, MW2 medial white matter at the high convexity level, GWR Basal ganglia = (CN + PU)/(CC + PIC); GWR Cerebrum = (MC1 + MC2) / (MW1 + MW2); GWR Average = (GWR Basal ganglia + GWR Cerebrum)/2.

Figure 3

Comparison of the attenuations in gray and white matter between groups. The ends of the floating columns indicate the min and max values, and the middle line is the mean.

Ratio of gray matter to white matter

The three GWRs were significantly higher in patients with good neurological outcomes than in patients with poor neurological outcomes (p = 0.005, 0.041 and 0.003, respectively). The average GWR was the strongest predictor of poor neurological outcome as assessed using ROC curves (basal ganglia AUC = 0.716; cerebrum AUC = 0.685; average AUC = 0.747) (Figure 4). Four patients who had an average GWR < 1.14 predicted a poor neurological outcome with a sensitivity of 13.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.8-30.7), a specificity of 100% (95% CI 83.9-100), a positive predictive value of 100% (95% CI 2.5-100), and a negative predictive value of 44.7% (95% CI 28.9-58.9) (Table 3).
Table 3

Specificity and sensitivity for poor outcome of attenuation measurements and GWR

GWR

Cutoff value

Sensitivity

Specificity

PPV

NPV

AUC (95% CI)

p

Basal ganglia

1.12

3.3

100

100

42.0

0.716

0.005

1.24

66.7

61.9

71.4

56.5

(0.572-0.833)

Cerebrum

1.12

20.0

100

100

46.7

0.685

0.015

1.22

70.0

61.9

72.4

59.1

(0.540-0.808)

Average

1.14

13.3

100

100

44.7

0.747

0.003

 

1.24

76.7

57.1

71.9

63.2

(0.579-0.838)

 

GWR gray-white matter ratio, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, AUC area under curve, CI confidence interval.

Figure 4

Receiver operator characteristic curve for the prediction poor outcome using the GWRs.

Discussion

Post-cardiac arrest brain injury remains a common cause of morbidity and mortality despite the advances made in treatment over time [11]. The measurement of the severity of brain injuries after cardiac arrest is important for the prediction of neurological outcomes. The prediction of the likelihood of neurological recovery for patients in comas is important from several perspectives, such as cost containment, the facilitation of organ donation, and providing information to the patients’ families so that therapeutic decisions can be made.

Brain CT is a useful method to evaluate comatose patients after cardiac arrest because the images are readily obtained within a short period of time. Cocchi M. N. et al. [12] reported that it may be important and useful to obtain a brain CT scan early in the clinical course because the results of such imaging could aid in diagnosis and the selection of the appropriate therapeutic interventions. However the utility of CT scans taken shortly after cardiac arrest not known because few studies have investigated the relationship between the interval and the incidence of CT signs in OHCA survivors. The timing of brain CT scans has not been uniform in previous studies; the intervals range from several hours to days after cardiac arrest [8, 9, 13, 14]. Therefore, the timeline of the initial appearance of recognizable ischemic signs on CT scans is not known. Inamasu et al. [15] reported significant differences in the incidence of loss of boundary signs on CT scans and in the unfavorable outcome rates between scans with a cardiac arrest to ROSC interval ≤20 min and scans with an interval >20 min. The median time from ROSC to the CT scan was only 16 minutes (range, 1 to 59 minutes) in our study, which is very short relative to the median times in previous studies. However, if this time frame is sufficient to identify ischemic brain injury after cardiac arrest, immediate brain CT scans after ROSC will be more helpful for the early determination of the prognosis.

The CT signs of brain ischemia/hypoxia resulting from cardiac arrest are well known [16]. The loss of differential between the GM and WM and cortical sulcal effacement are the signs most frequently documented in the literature [8, 9, 13, 14]. The difference between GM and WM in CT images arises because the higher water content and lower lipid content of the GM result in a higher oxygen concentration and a lower carbon concentration, which increase the level of photoelectric absorption [17]. The selective vulnerability of GM to ischemia results from its higher metabolic rate, greater blood flow, and susceptibility to excitotoxicity [18, 19]. Increased vascular permeability leads to the extravasation of fluid (vasogenic edema) and to changes in ion flow due to excitotoxicity (cytotoxic edema), and these factors contribute to the preferential development of edema in the GM over the WM. Significant differences between the two groups in our study were observed in all of the studied GM areas except the MC1.

The CN and PU at the basal ganglia level are commonly used for the measurement of GM attenuation, but the predictive power of GM attenuation for patient prognosis after cardiac arrest is lower than that of the GWR [8]. The same result was observed in our study. Changes in the GWR reflect edema and decreased x-ray attenuation in the GM. Therefore, the GWR is the preferred metric for the identification of loss of boundary signs and the extent of brain injury. The GWR could be used to predict outcomes instead of the attenuation of the GM alone. A recent study revealed that an average GWR < 1.20 exhibited a specificity of 98% for the prediction of mortality, similar to the specificities of previous study cutoffs of 1.18 and 1.22, which were 100% [810].

The cutoff value for the GWR was lower in our study when using ROC analysis than in previous studies and a GWR < 1.14 exhibited a specificity of 100% for the prediction of a poor neurologic outcome. The reasons for this difference are not clear. However, all of the patients in our study group received therapeutic hypothermia; therefore, patients in whom a poor neurological prognosis was predicted according to the results of previous studies exhibited a decreased probability of a poor outcome because of the use of therapeutic hypothermia. However, the cutoff value of <1.14 for the GWR exhibited a sensitivity of only 13.3%, which may decrease the power to predict outcomes.

The level of the basal ganglia is the best level for the assessment of GWR [8, 9], consistent with the known sensitivity of the basal ganglia to injurious stimuli due to their high metabolic activity and their location within the boundary zones of perfusion. However, Wu et al. [20] reported that edema throughout the brain increases the likelihood of mortality relative to edema in a single region. We measured the GWR at the levels of the basal ganglia and the cerebrum. The GWR varied dependently of each other. The cerebrum GWR was lower on average than the basal ganglia GWR, suggesting that the cerebrum was more prone to edema than the basal ganglia. We also calculated the average of the two GWRs, and this average had the strongest predictive power. These results suggest that the determination of the GWRs of various regions in the whole brain may aid in the prediction of neurological outcomes after cardiac arrest.

This study suffers from several limitations. First, this study was retrospective. Second, the sample of 51 survivors included in this study may not be sufficiently large to achieve high statistical power. Third, patients who did not undergo CT scans were excluded despite the use of therapeutic hypothermia treatment, and this exclusion may have resulted in selection bias and thus influenced the results. Fourth, our cutoff value was statistically significant to determine prognosis, but the sensitivity was low. The prognostic power was not sufficient to predict outcomes. The prognosis was also difficult to predict using the CT results alone. Finally, we did not consider differences in the time between collapse and the CT scans or the different etiologies of arrest, such as cardiac, respiratory and others, in our patients. Some investigators have reported that the time between arrest and the CT scan is not related to the GWR or the attenuation values for any brain region, but the impact of variations in this duration cannot be disregarded. Therefore, a well-designed prospective study using a larger number of patients is required to confirm the GWR cutoff value for the prediction of poor neurological outcomes.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that a low GWR, as determined from immediate brain CT scans in patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia after ROSC, was associated with a poor neurological outcome. And the GWR is very attractive for early outcome prediction because many hospitals treat OHCA patients but not all of them have a specialized neurology service for electrophysiological testing and interpretation of clinical findings. It may be helpful to develop an early prognostic model for cardiac arrest patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia.

Abbreviations

OHCA: 

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

CT: 

Computed tomography

GM: 

Gray matter

WM: 

White matter

GWR: 

Gray matter to white matter ratio

ROSC: 

Return of spontaneous circulation

GCS: 

Glasgow Coma Scale

CPC: 

Cerebral Performance Category

CPR: 

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation

ROI: 

Regions of interest

HU: 

Hounsfield Units

CN: 

Caudate nucleus

PU: 

Putamen

CC: 

Corpus callosum

PIC: 

Posterior limb of the internal capsule

MC: 

Medial cortex

MW: 

Medial white matter

ROC: 

Receiver operating characteristic

AUC: 

Area under the curve.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors report this study did not receive any outside funding or support.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea
(2)
Department of Emergency Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary’s Hospital

References

  1. Nichol G, TECCW, et al: Regional variation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence and outcome. JAMA: J Am Med Assoc. 2008, 300: 1423-1431. 10.1001/jama.300.12.1423.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernard SA, Gray TW, Buist MD, Jones BM, Silvester W, Gutteridge G, Smith K: Treatment of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with induced hypothermia. N Eng J Med. 2002, 346: 557-563. 10.1056/NEJMoa003289.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Bottiger BW, Arntz HR, Chamberlain DA, Bluhmki E, Belmans A, Danays T, Carli PA, Adgey JA, Bode C, Wenzel V, et al: Thrombolysis during resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Eng J Med. 2008, 359: 2651-2662. 10.1056/NEJMoa070570.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest Study G: Mild therapeutic hypothermia to improve the neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest. N Eng J Med. 2002, 346: 549-556.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Koenig MA, Kaplan PW, Thakor NV: Clinical neurophysiologic monitoring and brain injury from cardiac arrest. Neurol Clin. 2006, 24: 89-106. 10.1016/j.ncl.2005.11.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Oksanen T, Tiainen M, Skrifvars MB, Varpula T, Kuitunen A, Castren M, Pettila V: Predictive power of serum NSE and OHCA score regarding 6-month neurologic outcome after out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation and therapeutic hypothermia. Resuscitation. 2009, 80: 165-170. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.08.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Inamasu J, Miyatake S, Tomioka H, Suzuki M, Nakatsukasa M, Maeda N, Ito T, Arai K, Komura M, Kase K, Kobayashi K: Subarachnoid haemorrhage as a cause of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a prospective computed tomography study. Resuscitation. 2009, 80: 977-980. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.05.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Choi SP, Park HK, Park KN, Kim YM, Ahn KJ, Choi KH, Lee WJ, Jeong SK: The density ratio of grey to white matter on computed tomography as an early predictor of vegetative state or death after cardiac arrest. Emergency medicine journal: EMJ. 2008, 25: 666-669. 10.1136/emj.2007.053306.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Torbey MT, Geocadin R, Bhardwaj A: Brain arrest neurological outcome scale (BrANOS): predicting mortality and severe disability following cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2004, 63: 55-63. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.03.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Metter RB, Rittenberger JC, Guyette FX, Callaway CW: Association between a quantitative CT scan measure of brain edema and outcome after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2011, 82: 1180-1185. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.04.001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Nolan JP, Neumar RW, Adrie C, Aibiki M, Berg RA, Bottiger BW, Callaway C, Clark RS, Geocadin RG, Jauch EC, et al: Post-cardiac arrest syndrome: epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and prognostication. A Scientific Statement from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation; the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee; the Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; the Council on Cardiopulmonary, Perioperative, and Critical Care; the Council on Clinical Cardiology; the Council on Stroke. Resuscitation. 2008, 79: 350-379. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.09.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cocchi MN, Lucas JM, Salciccioli J, Carney E, Herman S, Zimetbaum P, Donnino MW: The role of cranial computed tomography in the immediate post-cardiac arrest period. Intern Emerg Med. 2010, 5: 533-538. 10.1007/s11739-010-0403-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kjos BO, Brant-Zawadzki M, Young RG: Early CT findings of global central nervous system hypoperfusion. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983, 141: 1227-1232. 10.2214/ajr.141.6.1227.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Yanagawa Y, Un-no Y, Sakamoto T, Okada Y: Cerebral density on CT immediately after a successful resuscitation of cardiopulmonary arrest correlates with outcome. Resuscitation. 2005, 64: 97-101. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.06.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Inamasu J, Miyatake S, Suzuki M, Nakatsukasa M, Tomioka H, Honda M, Kase K, Kobayashi K: Early CT signs in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors: Temporal profile and prognostic significance. Resuscitation. 2010, 81: 534-538. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.01.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Morimoto Y, Kemmotsu O, Kitami K, Matsubara I, Tedo I: Acute brain swelling after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: pathogenesis and outcome. Crit Care Med. 1993, 21: 104-110. 10.1097/00003246-199301000-00020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Brooks RA, Di Chiro G, Keller MR: Explanation of cerebral white–gray contrast in computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1980, 4: 489-491. 10.1097/00004728-198008000-00016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Arbelaez A, Castillo M, Mukherji SK: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of global cerebral anoxia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999, 20: 999-1007.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gutierrez LG, Rovira A, Portela LA, Leite Cda C, Lucato LT: CT and MR in non-neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: radiological findings with pathophysiological correlations. Neuroradiology. 2010, 52: 949-976. 10.1007/s00234-010-0728-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Wu O, Batista LM, Lima FO, Vangel MG, Furie KL, Greer DM: Predicting clinical outcome in comatose cardiac arrest patients using early noncontrast computed tomography. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. 2011, 42: 985-992. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.594879.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kim et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.